Here is an idea on how to pay for tax cuts

[Pete7469]

STOP SPENDING SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!

I seriously have no idea why the federal government can NEVER seem to be held accountable or expected to reduce spending. Even when the republicrats attempt to reduce INCREASES, the bed wetters wail about starving old people and "the (fattest) poor" (people on earth). Instead of the feds increasing spending levels %8 every year, how about they just increase it %1? All they have to do is an equally piss poor job next year as they did this year, and they still get a little extra.

That sounds like a goddamn "compromise" to me. I'm a fuckin "moderate" now, look at me.

If it were really up to me, I'd slash the entire budget %10 and not allow an increase until it can be justified. The amount of waste I witnessed as a soldier was breath taking, I know for damn sure the civil service departments are no better if not worse in some cases. I can bet there are thousands of checks that go out to people that don't show up anywhere to earn them, if they even truly exist. Add the redundancy to it and you could probably cut %25 and still reasonably expect to federal government to perform just as pitifully as it does now.

It's time to give the nanny state a double mastectomy and sew her gash up.

 

[TNHarley]

You have the best words

 

[TNHarley]

Crazy thing is, probably 75% of the fed govt functions are unconstitutional.
"why are they slashing &%$#$% to pay for ^$#(^*(?"
"who gives a fuck? They shouldnt be doing EITHER!"

 

[ColonelAngus]

Progs love to ask the rhetorical question: "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR THE TAX CUTS?"

SPEND LESS....DUH!

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....they CLAIM to care about not FUCKING OVER their children with global warming, but they don't care about burdening their children with crippling debt.

We are about 10 years from being Greece.

 

[Pete7469]

Crazy thing is, probably 75% of the govt functions are unconstitutional.
"why are they slashing &%$#$% to pay for ^$#(^*(?"
"who gives a fuck? They shouldnt be doing EITHER!"

Exactly, but the states preferred to pass the buck and allowed the feds to start doing the shit they've been doing since the regressive sociopath Woodrow Wilson was elected.

 

[g5000]

That's right. Cut the $1.4 trillion in tax expenditure spending and you can cut tax rates for everyone and pay down the debt.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

STOP SPENDING SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!

I seriously have no idea why the federal government can NEVER seem to be held accountable or expected to reduce spending. Even when the republicrats attempt to reduce INCREASES, the bed wetters wail about starving old people and "the (fattest) poor" (people on earth). Instead of the feds increasing spending levels %8 every year, how about they just increase it %1? All they have to do is an equally piss poor job next year as they did this year, and they still get a little extra.

That sounds like a goddamn "compromise" to me. I'm a fuckin "moderate" now, look at me.

If it were really up to me, I'd slash the entire budget %10 and not allow an increase until it can be justified. The amount of waste I witnessed as a soldier was breath taking, I know for damn sure the civil service departments are no better if not worse in some cases. I can bet there are thousands of checks that go out to people that don't show up anywhere to earn them, if they even truly exist. Add the redundancy to it and you could probably cut %25 and still reasonably expect to federal government to perform just as pitifully as it does now.

It's time to give the nanny state a double mastectomy and sew her gash up.

I agree with the government being over bloated, too much fraud, waste and abuse and cuts need to be made. But, I hate to say this, your percent signs need to be behind the figure.. 1% 10% 25%.. Just saying....

Percent Sign - Rules and Examples

For example:

• 25 out of 100 equals 25%
  
  (25 percent)
  
  
• 50 out of 100 equals 50%
  
  (50 percent)
  
  
• 75 out of 100 equals 75 %
  
  (75 percent)
  
  
• 100 out of 100 equals 100%
  
  (100 percent)

 

[Pete7469]

Progs love to ask the rhetorical question: "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR THE TAX CUTS?"

SPEND LESS....DUH!

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....they care about not FUCKING OVER their children with global warming, but they don't care about burdening their children with crippling debt.

We are about 10 years from being Greece.

Regressive kill their children often enough, you think bankrupting them presents a moral problem?

Probably not.

They damn sure don't give a fruit fly's fuck about anyone else's children.

 

[Pete7469]

I agree with the government being over bloated, too much fraud, waste and abuse and cuts need to be made. But, I hate to say this, your percent signs need to be behind the figure.. 1% 10% 25%.. Just saying....

I have been corrected in the past for doing it that way too, but I'm sure you're right. I shall try and remember to do it properly.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Progs love to ask the rhetorical question: "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR THE TAX CUTS?"

SPEND LESS....DUH!

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....they care about not FUCKING OVER their children with global warming, but they don't care about burdening their children with crippling debt.

We are about 10 years from being Greece.

Regressive kill their children often enough, you think bankrupting them presents a moral problem?

Probably not.

They damn sure don't give a fruit fly's fuck about anyone else's children.

Global Warming is an INVISIBLE BOOGEYMAN they can LIE ABOUT.

Our increasing debt will destroy the economy for our children...that's a straight up verifiable fact. The numbers do not lie.

We currently pay nearly $500 BILLION IN INTEREST EXPENSE ON THE NATIONAL DEBT EVERY SINGLE FUCKING YEAR.

$500 billion per year buys a lot of abortions and condoms for Dem voters.

 

[my2¢]

Perhaps we need a 4th branch of government, headed by a Chief Financial Officer? How do we fix this? Neither party has acted responsibly.

 

[ph3iron]

STOP SPENDING SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!

I seriously have no idea why the federal government can NEVER seem to be held accountable or expected to reduce spending. Even when the republicrats attempt to reduce INCREASES, the bed wetters wail about starving old people and "the (fattest) poor" (people on earth). Instead of the feds increasing spending levels %8 every year, how about they just increase it %1? All they have to do is an equally piss poor job next year as they did this year, and they still get a little extra.

That sounds like a goddamn "compromise" to me. I'm a fuckin "moderate" now, look at me.

If it were really up to me, I'd slash the entire budget %10 and not allow an increase until it can be justified. The amount of waste I witnessed as a soldier was breath taking, I know for damn sure the civil service departments are no better if not worse in some cases. I can bet there are thousands of checks that go out to people that don't show up anywhere to earn them, if they even truly exist. Add the redundancy to it and you could probably cut %25 and still reasonably expect to federal government to perform just as pitifully as it does now.

It's time to give the nanny state a double mastectomy and sew her gash up.

Easy, cut medicare, SS and Medicaid.
Keep the gov out of my Medicare as the high school trumpette said

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....

It’s obviously not enough for conservatives either since you guys are the ones primarily running the debt up

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

STOP SPENDING SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!

I seriously have no idea why the federal government can NEVER seem to be held accountable or expected to reduce spending. Even when the republicrats attempt to reduce INCREASES, the bed wetters wail about starving old people and "the (fattest) poor" (people on earth). Instead of the feds increasing spending levels %8 every year, how about they just increase it %1? All they have to do is an equally piss poor job next year as they did this year, and they still get a little extra.

That sounds like a goddamn "compromise" to me. I'm a fuckin "moderate" now, look at me.

If it were really up to me, I'd slash the entire budget %10 and not allow an increase until it can be justified. The amount of waste I witnessed as a soldier was breath taking, I know for damn sure the civil service departments are no better if not worse in some cases. I can bet there are thousands of checks that go out to people that don't show up anywhere to earn them, if they even truly exist. Add the redundancy to it and you could probably cut %25 and still reasonably expect to federal government to perform just as pitifully as it does now.

It's time to give the nanny state a double mastectomy and sew her gash up.

Easy, cut medicare, SS and Medicaid.
Keep the gov out of my Medicare as the high school trumpette said

We need to severely cut back military spending

 

[ph3iron]

Progs love to ask the rhetorical question: "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR THE TAX CUTS?"

SPEND LESS....DUH!

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....they care about not FUCKING OVER their children with global warming, but they don't care about burdening their children with crippling debt.

We are about 10 years from being Greece.

Regressive kill their children often enough, you think bankrupting them presents a moral problem?

Probably not.

They damn sure don't give a fruit fly's fuck about anyone else's children.

Global Warming is an INVISIBLE BOOGEYMAN they can LIE ABOUT.

Our increasing debt will destroy the economy for our children...that's a straight up verifiable fact. The numbers do not lie.

We currently pay nearly $500 BILLION IN INTEREST EXPENSE ON THE NATIONAL DEBT EVERY SINGLE FUCKING YEAR.

$500 billion per year buys a lot of abortions and condoms for Dem voters.

Iguess repubs are not smart enough to use birth control?
Abortions, such stupidity. Want to go back to coat hangers mr holier than though?
No problem with our pantywaist military which consumes 50% of discretionary if you count it all?
As they say "if you are not smart enough to get a real job, join the military, great socialist benefits"

 

[The Derp]

We need to severely cut back military spending

Absolutely. A $600B defense budget couldn't protect us from being hacked by a few hundred Russian trolls. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from a pandemic. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from rising seas, stronger storms, and droughts.

All a $600B defense budget does is protect us from the USSR circa 1982.

 

[TNHarley]

We need to severely cut back military spending

Absolutely. A $600B defense budget couldn't protect us from being hacked by a few hundred Russian trolls. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from a pandemic. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from rising seas, stronger storms, and droughts.

All a $600B defense budget does is protect us from the USSR circa 1982.

 

[ph3iron]

Progs love to ask the rhetorical question: "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR THE TAX CUTS?"

SPEND LESS....DUH!

$4 trillion budget and $20 trillion debt isn't enough for Progs....they CLAIM to care about not FUCKING OVER their children with global warming, but they don't care about burdening their children with crippling debt.

We are about 10 years from being Greece.

Yup if we are populated by foul mouthed rubes who only know caps and 4 letter words

 

[ph3iron]

We need to severely cut back military spending

Absolutely. A $600B defense budget couldn't protect us from being hacked by a few hundred Russian trolls. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from a pandemic. A $600B defense budget isn't going to protect us from rising seas, stronger storms, and droughts.

All a $600B defense budget does is protect us from the USSR circa 1982.

It's an industry that has to be kept going.

 

[rightwinger]

STOP SPENDING SO FUCKING MUCH!!!!

I seriously have no idea why the federal government can NEVER seem to be held accountable or expected to reduce spending. Even when the republicrats attempt to reduce INCREASES, the bed wetters wail about starving old people and "the (fattest) poor" (people on earth). Instead of the feds increasing spending levels %8 every year, how about they just increase it %1? All they have to do is an equally piss poor job next year as they did this year, and they still get a little extra.

That sounds like a goddamn "compromise" to me. I'm a fuckin "moderate" now, look at me.

If it were really up to me, I'd slash the entire budget %10 and not allow an increase until it can be justified. The amount of waste I witnessed as a soldier was breath taking, I know for damn sure the civil service departments are no better if not worse in some cases. I can bet there are thousands of checks that go out to people that don't show up anywhere to earn them, if they even truly exist. Add the redundancy to it and you could probably cut %25 and still reasonably expect to federal government to perform just as pitifully as it does now.

It's time to give the nanny state a double mastectomy and sew her gash up.

OK...let's cut spending FIRST

Then cut taxes accordingly