Hello everyone, I am a legend.

[007]

Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was the world's most unhinged lunatic. He's now dead. So that moves Keith Olbermann up to first place.

Hmm, you mean Zarqawi used to provide actual video and quotes proving his 'enemy' were liars? I must have missed that.

Do... you... WORK at sounding like an idiot, or does it just come naturally?

 

[elvis]

which is more frustrating, talking to edthecynic, who is a moron, or eots, who is fairly intelligent but indoctrinated and paranoid?

 

[DiveCon]

which is more frustrating, talking to edthecynic, who is a moron, or eots, who is fairly intelligent but indoctrinated and paranoid?

i'd say its a toss up

 

[edthecynic]

me attempting to explain to you would be a waste of time
you are a complete ******* moron

Blaming me is one way of weaseling out of giving a better context, if not for me then at least for the potentially SMARTER people who might just be reading along, since you know my context is dead on!

no, your a ******* raving lunatic
LOL

And you are STILL without an "in context" context.

I'll tell you why, too. Since no one in the "Liberal media" has called him on it, he has not given a RATIONALIZATION for it yet so you have no words to parrot.
Quite obvious, my dear Watson, quite obvious.

 

[DiveCon]

Blaming me is one way of weaseling out of giving a better context, if not for me then at least for the potentially SMARTER people who might just be reading along, since you know my context is dead on!

no, your a ******* raving lunatic
LOL

And you are STILL without an "in context" context.

I'll tell you why, too. Since no one in the "Liberal media" has called him on it, he has not given a RATIONALIZATION for it yet so you have no words to parrot.
Quite obvious, my dear Watson, quite obvious.

no, because to do so would be a waste of time
you wouldnt accept it, and i dont feel like doing work that would go ignored

 

[edthecynic]

no, your a ******* raving lunatic
LOL

And you are STILL without an "in context" context.

I'll tell you why, too. Since no one in the "Liberal media" has called him on it, he has not given a RATIONALIZATION for it yet so you have no words to parrot.
Quite obvious, my dear Watson, quite obvious.

no, because to do so would be a waste of time
you wouldnt accept it, and i dont feel like doing work that would go ignored

That RATIONALIZATION doesn't cut it. Especially after having cleverly maneuvered you into being stuck thinking for yourself. A distinct disadvantage for you.

Speaking about clever maneuvers, my appeal for more negative reps seems to have resulted in positive reps coming my way. After your 3 different hits I was at -37 and now only -1. You better hit me with a 4th one soon if you want to keep me minus. That appears to be a big thing with you CON$.

 

[DiveCon]

And you are STILL without an "in context" context.

I'll tell you why, too. Since no one in the "Liberal media" has called him on it, he has not given a RATIONALIZATION for it yet so you have no words to parrot.
Quite obvious, my dear Watson, quite obvious.

no, because to do so would be a waste of time
you wouldnt accept it, and i dont feel like doing work that would go ignored

That RATIONALIZATION doesn't cut it. Especially after having cleverly maneuvered you into being stuck thinking for yourself. A distinct disadvantage for you.

Speaking about clever maneuvers, my appeal for more negative reps seems to have resulted in positive reps coming my way. After your 3 different hits I was at -37 and now only -1. You better hit me with a 4th one soon if you want to keep me minus. That appears to be a big thing with you CON$.

whatever you say, asshole
you are no longer fun for me because you only keep doing the same thing over and over


you ARE the WEAKEST link, GOOD BYE

 

[edthecynic]

no, because to do so would be a waste of time
you wouldnt accept it, and i dont feel like doing work that would go ignored

That RATIONALIZATION doesn't cut it. Especially after having cleverly maneuvered you into being stuck thinking for yourself. A distinct disadvantage for you.

Speaking about clever maneuvers, my appeal for more negative reps seems to have resulted in positive reps coming my way. After your 3 different hits I was at -37 and now only -1. You better hit me with a 4th one soon if you want to keep me minus. That appears to be a big thing with you CON$.

whatever you say, asshole
you are no longer fun for me because you only keep doing the same thing over and over


you ARE the WEAKEST link, GOOD BYE

You STILL can't give the "in context" context, try again.

 

[Grind]

Have we seen anything legendary from Grind
Or does his status remain in his own mind?

Even his own mind is beginning to doubt his legendary status.

lol very doubtful sir.

 

[pal]

lol very doubtful sir.

Cocky bastard today?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hi everyone, I am the best. You are now all lucky to have me in your presence. A few of you may already know me cause you never stfu about this place at another location.

peace out cubscouts.

A leg end, which end of the leg? And only 68 posts in the last 16 years....

 

[BackAgain]

Cocky bastard today?

If by “today” you mean sometime in 2009.

Anyway, it’s weird to see how strange some people were even in those days.

 

[Zebra]

Hi everyone, I am the best. You are now all lucky to have me in your presence. A few of you may already know me cause you never stfu about this place at another location.

peace out cubscouts.

from 2009 ....