Zone1 I am late

They were actual a century ago, language changes over time.

In any case, does it matter?

Course not, if cheap points are all ya got...
Sounds like Orwell's doublespeak to me.

Doublespeak in George Orwell's "1984" refers to language that deliberately obscures or distorts meaning, often used by the government to manipulate truth and control thought. It is closely related to the concept of doublethink, where individuals accept contradictory beliefs simultaneously, allowing the ruling Party to maintain power.
Wikipedia
peramuseum.org
 
Sounds like Orwell's doublespeak to me.

Doublespeak in George Orwell's "1984" refers to language that deliberately obscures or distorts meaning, often used by the government to manipulate truth and control thought. It is closely related to the concept of doublethink, where individuals accept contradictory beliefs simultaneously, allowing the ruling Party to maintain power.
Wikipedia
peramuseum.org
It's not every day I see irony on steroids.

"The first
Oxford English Dictionary (originally A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles) was revolutionary because it was a historical dictionary, tracking the evolution of words from their earliest known appearance to their current usage, rather than just listing contemporary meanings. It differed by including all known vocabulary (including obsolete words) and using millions of reader-submitted citations to document usage, taking 70 years to complete (1857–1928). "
Google AI

It's pretty much the opposite of Orwellian, it painstaking recorded a word, revealing it's history, changes to it's meaning and spelling. It's a love letter to the English language.
 
It's not every day I see irony on steroids.

"The first
Oxford English Dictionary (originally A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles) was revolutionary because it was a historical dictionary, tracking the evolution of words from their earliest known appearance to their current usage, rather than just listing contemporary meanings. It differed by including all known vocabulary (including obsolete words) and using millions of reader-submitted citations to document usage, taking 70 years to complete (1857–1928). "
Google AI

It's pretty much the opposite of Orwellian, it painstaking recorded a word, revealing it's history, changes to it's meaning and spelling. It's a love letter to the English language.
Riiiiight. SMH, What is bad is now good and what is good is now bad. LOL
 
Whaddya know, somebody has heard of Wikipedia.

You get a brownie point.

What I said stands.

The Oxford was the first modern dictionary. It dealt with a wide variety of issues, like change, that made it groundbreaking.

It also makes it relevant to the discussion. The Oxford tracked the history of words. It was a massive undertaking, I usually say it was the wikipedia of it's time.

If you want to discuss what modern is, we can do that.
No, I have a copy of the original. You know, you're probably considered pretty smart amongst your 12 year old reddit group, but you're dealing with adults now, sport.

So you better catch up.
 
images


so glad you found our little corner of the interwebs... if you haven't stopped by our reception desk to pick up yer complimentary hazmat suit, i highly recommend you do so! see you on the forums!
 
Back
Top Bottom