“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

OK

Let’s stop producing guns and see what happens
You act like the only folks that can make them are big corporations. Are you really that dumb? Oh wait, everyone knows RWINGER. :71:

I'll tell you what will happen, criminals will have them b/c of their motivation, and everyone else will be at the mercy of the incompetent STATE.

Banning guns is impossible now. That horse has left the barn, permanently.

Solid Concepts 3D Prints Another Metal Gun, ‘Reason’, a 10mm Auto 1911

Student jailed for making 3D printed gun
Good!

Flood the earth with them and balance the power.

All people should be armed.

.
No problem at all with how many weapons there are, but where the problem comes in, uhh is where the left doesn't know the difference between a good guy and a bad guy these days.

This has become a major problem these days, but do you know why the left has this problem ?? It's because they are at war with those who believe in God and freedom, and the leftist are against those who are a religious people in this nation, otherwise against those who have built their lives around these beliefs be it in this world, and/or within this country. Christians are great people, and they are good peaceful people, but the bottom line is that those who are bad or are being used because they have a tendency to be bad, well they hate Christians, and they are doing everything in their power to destroy the word of God from our nation, and all because of it's convicting powers, and if it means destroying the good Christian's, then they will attempt to do that also. Gonna get interesting indeed.

Relative morality has replaced objective morality. IOW, 'morality' is now whatever anyone wants it to be. Laws have traditionally been based on objective, Judeo-Christian morals and values. Today, morality is dictated by lawyers, not God.
Yeah, and how's that been working out for us lately ?? Not tooooo gooood.... Denial is strong these days, and that is a shame because people's lives are at stake in these things.

It's called undermining a society by removing traditional morals and values given by a Creator, higher power, God. Neo-Marxists do this to bring a successful society to its knees in an attempt to supplant it with their failed socialist ideas which never work and never will and typically result in the murder of millions of innocent souls.
 
And how is a traditional Hunting Rifle deadlier in a mass shooting? I be good but, damned, I ain't that good and never was.

WHAT is a traditional hunting rifle, Comrade?

One of the more popular before the AR-15 became the #1 hunting rifle was the Winchester 1894 30-30, designed for use by the U.S. Army....

iu


^^^ Weapon of War - and unlike the AR-15, was actually USED in wars.
 
What idea do you present? I haven't seen any real ideas as of yet. You scream "NO" or "You can't tell me what to do" every step of the way. I want the AR to be regulated but leave the traditional hunting rifles alone. Is that a bad idea? And I have clearly stated my reasoning why. Now clearly state your ideas.

Hunting rifles are deadlier.

No, they aren't. Some are just more powerful (velocity vs. energy). I've never seen an elephant gun with a 100-round rotary magazine.

Take one average run-of-mill duck gun. Load with OO buckshot (at 9 shot per shell) and three pulls of the trigger will put 27 projectiles in the air. Many have magazines able to hold five which will yield 45 projectiles with five trigger pulls and no reloading. Whereas an AR-15 requires 20 trigger pulls to fire 20rnds with a 20rnd. mag. If both are fired into a packed crowd of people which is more deadly?

The AR. The AR will penetrate up to 3 bodies and probably lodge in the forth. The OO buck won't go much past the first person although it's going to make one hell of a mess.

Maybe but doubtful. The 5.56 round is highly frangible and tends to fly apart or deflect wildly when hits something. A more stable and powerful traditional hunting round like the .30-'06 could be expected to have much greater penetration. My money would be on the 12 Ga. fired at aprox. head level.

No question that the .30-06 is one of the most deadly rounds, an actual high velocity round. I've got a nice Weatherby with a Leupold optics. Even I can hit at 200 yards. Someone good could be effective at 500 or better.
 
You mean background checks or limit magazines to 10 rounds?

Comrade, what need do people have for assault religions? Why do civilians need a religion crafted by a 6th century warlord? We should limit high capacity hate, and outlaw Islam. I'm not talking about banning all religion, just assault religion like Islam...
 
We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.
I asked you this before :
Why do you think the current court would rule it constitutional?
Maybe this time you'll answer.

It would rule it constitutional because even If the court deems 2nd amendment to apply to individuals owning firearms, the law only limits the type of weapon you could have, it does not prevent you from owning a firearm.
The Supreme Court ruled that in order for a firearm to be protected by the second amendment, it must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, in common use of the time, and supplied by the citizen.

So tell me what firearm is there that is in common use that would have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia?
 

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

Yeah stupid, it's illegal to pass laws that criminalize acts in the past. If you try to make people who legally own AR-15's into felons, it's YOU who are the criminals, and you'll be treated accordingly.

Hey nutbag the only one talking about criminalizing past acts is you, not me.

I swear, something really ain’t right with you righties.

No, actually Beta the Dork said he would criminalize past acts, you ******* moron.
 
Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

Yeah stupid, it's illegal to pass laws that criminalize acts in the past. If you try to make people who legally own AR-15's into felons, it's YOU who are the criminals, and you'll be treated accordingly.

Hey nutbag the only one talking about criminalizing past acts is you, not me.

I swear, something really ain’t right with you righties.

No, actually Beta the Dork said he would criminalize past acts, you ******* moron.

Unbelivable. You keep saying retarded bullshit and calling someone else a moron? I guess you are just too ******* dumb to know when to put that little tail between your legs and run along.

Nobody is talking about criminalizing past acts, it's still just some made up nonsense in your head. Beto proposed criminalizing CURRENT possession, not past purchase or ownership.
 
Last edited:
Comrade;

{At a minimum, ex post facto prohibits legislatures from passing laws which retroactively criminalize behavior. However, this prohibition does not attach as strictly to judicial decisions. Appellate courts sometimes announce a new rule of law, but will not apply it to the case in front of it, in order to attempt to comply with ex post facto prohibitions. }

Ex Post Facto

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

Yeah stupid, it's illegal to pass laws that criminalize acts in the past. If you try to make people who legally own AR-15's into felons, it's YOU who are the criminals, and you'll be treated accordingly.

Hey nutbag the only one talking about criminalizing past acts is you, not me.

I swear, something really ain’t right with you righties.

No, actually Beta the Dork said he would criminalize past acts, you ******* moron.

Unbelivable. You keep saying retarded bullshit and calling someone else a moron? I guess you are just too ******* dumb to know when to put that little tail between your legs and run along.

Nobody is talking about criminalizing past acts, it's still just some made up nonsense in your head. Beto proposed criminalizing CURRENT possession, not past purchase or ownership.

I am amazed by you Stalinists.

I mean, you've always been liars. Leftism is a manifestation of a society designed by and for psychopaths.

Still, after the Mueller report destroyed your witch hunt you vile twats lost any grip on sanity you may have once had. If reality doesn't suit your goal of creating hell on earth, just ******* lie. If Mueller says; "The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. " then you just ******* lie and claim he said the opposite. You lie right as proof of your lie is presented, then you keep lying.

So here you are, flat out lying about Beta the Dork. The fact that it is PROVEN has no impact on you, reality doesn't suit you, so you lie.

One cannot reason with pathological psychopaths.

Beto O'Rourke's Gun-Confiscation Proposal Is Unconstitutional but Clarifying | National Review
 

I'm done arguing this subject with gun nuts. We just have to hope voters force our politicians to do what's right. Similar to global warming. You can't even discuss it with right wingers. They are dug in.
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
 

I'm done arguing this subject with gun nuts. We just have to hope voters force our politicians to do what's right. Similar to global warming. You can't even discuss it with right wingers. They are dug in.
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
 
Last edited:
Wtf does that have to do with anything?

We’ve had the assault weapon ban for a decade and it was never ruled unconstitutional.

Yeah stupid, it's illegal to pass laws that criminalize acts in the past. If you try to make people who legally own AR-15's into felons, it's YOU who are the criminals, and you'll be treated accordingly.

Hey nutbag the only one talking about criminalizing past acts is you, not me.

I swear, something really ain’t right with you righties.

No, actually Beta the Dork said he would criminalize past acts, you ******* moron.

Unbelivable. You keep saying retarded bullshit and calling someone else a moron? I guess you are just too ******* dumb to know when to put that little tail between your legs and run along.

Nobody is talking about criminalizing past acts, it's still just some made up nonsense in your head. Beto proposed criminalizing CURRENT possession, not past purchase or ownership.

I am amazed by you Stalinists.

I mean, you've always been liars. Leftism is a manifestation of a society designed by and for psychopaths.

Still, after the Mueller report destroyed your witch hunt you vile twats lost any grip on sanity you may have once had. If reality doesn't suit your goal of creating hell on earth, just ******* lie. If Mueller says; "The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. " then you just ******* lie and claim he said the opposite. You lie right as proof of your lie is presented, then you keep lying.

So here you are, flat out lying about Beta the Dork. The fact that it is PROVEN has no impact on you, reality doesn't suit you, so you lie.

One cannot reason with pathological psychopaths.

Beto O'Rourke's Gun-Confiscation Proposal Is Unconstitutional but Clarifying | National Review

It's very simple.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW clearly lays out the definitions and nature of things like Presidential elections and gun rights, but these things stand in the Left's way. They don't care about law and intend to try to go right over and through it to get their unholy way of taking away political choice, representation and freedom in the land.

The Radical Left are the Domestic Terrorists we've worried about for so long.
 

I'm done arguing this subject with gun nuts. We just have to hope voters force our politicians to do what's right. Similar to global warming. You can't even discuss it with right wingers. They are dug in.
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
I’m going to vote
 
15th post

I'm done arguing this subject with gun nuts. We just have to hope voters force our politicians to do what's right. Similar to global warming. You can't even discuss it with right wingers. They are dug in.
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
I’m going to vote
That's a good option for us all.
 
I'm done arguing this subject with gun nuts. We just have to hope voters force our politicians to do what's right. Similar to global warming. You can't even discuss it with right wingers. They are dug in.
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
I’m going to vote
That's a good option for us all.
I went to a gun show bought 8 30 round magazines does that count?
 
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
I’m going to vote
That's a good option for us all.
I went to a gun show bought 8 30 round magazines does that count?
So I'll put you down as FOR 30 round mags. :)
 
Then I am done arguing with people who are solely emotionally based and won't think, just react. Emotionally.

So am I. It's time to clean up the gene pool a bit . You have a nice day.
That sounds a bit threatening.

Reported and screenshot taken.
I’m going to vote
That's a good option for us all.
I went to a gun show bought 8 30 round magazines does that count?
This one guy suggested you can only buy ten bullets at a time.lol
 
Back
Top Bottom