“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[iceberg]

Schumer is, he's gone out and demonized Beto's rant. Why do you supposed Schumer made this statement? just asking cause you think you're cute.

Chuck Schumer Says He Doesn’t Know Any Democrats Who Support Beto’s Gun Grab

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

We also need to limit bullet purchases to ten at a time

No. Don't be silly. My Ruger 450 bushmaster bullets are expensive. I think you can buy 20 at a time. I went up north and target practiced to get my scope right and I went through 16 bullets just getting ready for hunting season.

You are going too far now.

I go to the shooting range and what you just suggested in ridiculous. LOL

then target practice with a 22.

 

[pismoe]

I mean hey , take a privately owned Bar and tell the owner that he cannot allow smoking on HIS Private property seems pretty unAmerican Sealy .

 

[iceberg]

Schumer is, he's gone out and demonized Beto's rant. Why do you supposed Schumer made this statement? just asking cause you think you're cute.

Chuck Schumer Says He Doesn’t Know Any Democrats Who Support Beto’s Gun Grab

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

i would think i'm far from "rambo" but i still disagree this would get your desired effect. it would just give you a false sense of control and when it doesn't work like you desire, you go ban something else.

and then something else and then something else and so on and so on.

so i'm no rambo but i do realize it won't slow down someone on a mission. i just can't picture anyone in a shooting situation waiting for 10 rounds to go off so they now know they have about 3 seconds to stop someone.

concession always leads to more concessions,. Let's don't act like none of us don't know this. The founders wanted americans to defend themselves however the individual felt they needed to defend their selves. for someone to say, you can't have that thought is against the 1st amendment.

yep. and this is why gun owners will not budge. when you tell the left this they go COMMON SENSE PLEASE.

well common sense says you wanted to remove just ONE FLAG and when that happened, y'all went apeshit batty, drunk in your success and banned pretty much everything from the south and now blame global warming on slavery.

so in that light, no you can't have my gun.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Maybe you should be limited to ten words a day.

If the anti-gun loons looked at the right to free speech they way they look at the right to keep and bear arms -- and let's be clear - many of them do -- they would limit your communications to nothing more than an YES or NO pictograph and tell you your right to free speech has not been abridged.

 

[jc456]

I mean hey , take a privately owned Bar and tell the owner that he cannot allow smoking on HIS Private property seems pretty unAmerican Sealy .

correct, people who don't smoke and can't stand smoke don't need to go in. it is really a very simple concept

 

[jc456]

Schumer is, he's gone out and demonized Beto's rant. Why do you supposed Schumer made this statement? just asking cause you think you're cute.

Chuck Schumer Says He Doesn’t Know Any Democrats Who Support Beto’s Gun Grab

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

i would think i'm far from "rambo" but i still disagree this would get your desired effect. it would just give you a false sense of control and when it doesn't work like you desire, you go ban something else.

and then something else and then something else and so on and so on.

so i'm no rambo but i do realize it won't slow down someone on a mission. i just can't picture anyone in a shooting situation waiting for 10 rounds to go off so they now know they have about 3 seconds to stop someone.

concession always leads to more concessions,. Let's don't act like none of us don't know this. The founders wanted americans to defend themselves however the individual felt they needed to defend their selves. for someone to say, you can't have that thought is against the 1st amendment.

so thinking on it, the fact that they wish to take the guns is also them depriving americans of the 1st amendment. so taking two, takes one. just remember that as well. I'll wave a big fat AR-15 in Beto's puss and say you ain't taking my first amendment. fk off wannabe hispanic.

 

[iceberg]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

 

[iceberg]

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

i would think i'm far from "rambo" but i still disagree this would get your desired effect. it would just give you a false sense of control and when it doesn't work like you desire, you go ban something else.

and then something else and then something else and so on and so on.

so i'm no rambo but i do realize it won't slow down someone on a mission. i just can't picture anyone in a shooting situation waiting for 10 rounds to go off so they now know they have about 3 seconds to stop someone.

concession always leads to more concessions,. Let's don't act like none of us don't know this. The founders wanted americans to defend themselves however the individual felt they needed to defend their selves. for someone to say, you can't have that thought is against the 1st amendment.

so thinking on it, the fact that they wish to take the guns is also them depriving americans of the 1st amendment. so taking two, takes one. just remember that as well. I'll wave a big fat AR-15 in Beto's puss and say you ain't taking my first amendment. fk off wannabe hispanic.

well you're going to have to be more specific.

beto is 100% puss to me so that's a lot of waving.

 

[jc456]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

 

[jc456]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

 

[jc456]

BTW, it's like a politician that says, this tax increase is only until we catch up. and then five years later, this tax increase is only until we catch up!!! and then repeat until you have a .60 tax on gas.

 

[rightwinger]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

They need them to hunt Wallabies

 

[jc456]

Maybe you should be limited to ten words a day.

If the anti-gun loons looked at the right to free speech they way they look at the right to keep and bear arms -- and let's be clear - many of them do -- they would limit your communications to nothing more than an YES or NO pictograph and tell you your right to free speech has not been abridged.

The AR15 is a reasonable place for that line.

In your misguided opinion.

I think a reasonable place for that line is the standard load out of a foot soldier or marine.

If you insist on further diminishing the right, I will insist on motherfucking machine guns to minors.

Or you can stop now. You choose.

.

Insist all you want. Your wishes don't count anyway.

the wishes of gun-grabbers mean just as much.

Less. Far less. Anyone who labels everyone who simply enjoys the sport of shooting, target practice, competition, hunting, collecting, or values the history of firearms and the constitutional context and social value in keeping the public safe --- a "gun nut" --- does not deserve to be even considered an American.

BTW, the founders had muskets, muskets were war type rifles. The intent was to allow the public the same right to own war type rifles. Why do people think otherwise, they just got done with a war? a war on independence, you think they thought, well, now that we won, we can now call in all the guns and no one will ever want to fight us again? holy fk I think anyone thinking that is completely insane and brainless. WE now believe the trojan horse is rolling out, we have the three hijab's in DC telling us that we have no values, we have open border's threats, I mean, people as Cher once said..."WAKE UP'

QUOTE="jc456, post: 23142375, member: 46512"]

That is his opinion, I don't want to grab all guns, you can keep your hunting rifles and pistols, no bigger than a 10 magazine and you are allowed to only have one.

Who would need more?

After you shoot your ten rounds, you can reload it

And according to these rambo's here having to reload won't slow them down one bit. But then they cry if we suggest outlawing 20 round magazines. Reloading them when target practicing is too inconvenient they say. Shooting paper plates.

i would think i'm far from "rambo" but i still disagree this would get your desired effect. it would just give you a false sense of control and when it doesn't work like you desire, you go ban something else.

and then something else and then something else and so on and so on.

so i'm no rambo but i do realize it won't slow down someone on a mission. i just can't picture anyone in a shooting situation waiting for 10 rounds to go off so they now know they have about 3 seconds to stop someone.

concession always leads to more concessions,. Let's don't act like none of us don't know this. The founders wanted americans to defend themselves however the individual felt they needed to defend their selves. for someone to say, you can't have that thought is against the 1st amendment.

so thinking on it, the fact that they wish to take the guns is also them depriving americans of the 1st amendment. so taking two, takes one. just remember that as well. I'll wave a big fat AR-15 in Beto's puss and say you ain't taking my first amendment. fk off wannabe hispanic.[/QUOTE]

 

[iceberg]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

more than likely. while the dude used an AR-10, it's hardly the only thing needed to do such atrocities.

University of Texas tower shooting - Wikipedia

 

[iceberg]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

They need them to hunt Wallabies

yea, not trolling at all.

btw - did you report me? i need to know cause i hate living on this borrowed time.

 

[pismoe]

'Australia' mentioned so a bit on 'new zealand' . Just a blurb but I read something about 'new zealand' gov cracking down on Effective and Efficient guns just this morning .

 

[jc456]

when these fks say anything about well what about Australia, I just say, thank you, exactly the reason your shit isn't wanted.

 

[rightwinger]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

They need them to hunt Wallabies

yea, not trolling at all.

btw - did you report me? i need to know cause i hate living on this borrowed time.

Poor tard can’t take a joke

They can’t hunt Wallabies you moron
They are out of season

 

[iceberg]

the base problem is, they go for things that won't give them the desired result. instead of backing up to find out what will, the left gets emotional on the gun issue and widens their definitions to the point where a semi-automatic rifle is now a WMD.

stop making things they are not would be a first step in resolving these issues.

now back to the base problem - when banning this gun doesn't work, they will go for the next. when that doesn't work, the next. never at any point will they stop to go "shit, this isn't working, let's try something else" and that is pretty much the textbook definition of stupid.

Australia!!!!

iceberg you think the folks in Australia want back their guns? LOL

They need them to hunt Wallabies

yea, not trolling at all.

btw - did you report me? i need to know cause i hate living on this borrowed time.

Poor tard can’t take a joke

They can’t hunt Wallabies you moron
They are out of season

this is also off-topic, you topic policeman you.

can't take it when someone does to you what you do with 99.9% of your posts.

 

[toobfreak]

Maybe you should be limited to ten words a day.

If the anti-gun loons looked at the right to free speech they way they look at the right to keep and bear arms -- and let's be clear - many of them do -- they would limit your communications to nothing more than an YES or NO pictograph and tell you your right to free speech has not been abridged.

To be sure, this is how the Left view America. All the empty space in-between is simply deplorable areas full of no one worthy of a voice, an opinion or representation. In their post-Electoral College System, a simple head count, especially those areas in red, will be all that's needed to decide The Will Of The People. All others need not apply.