Hegeeth sexual assault claim revealed



1732224912623.webp
 
Um, I wish he c ould undo all the damage Trump did.

But tell me, Airchair General, how was he going to prevent what happened? Send in more troops to bolster the Afghan Government? That wasn't going to help. These guys had already punched the clock and shifted sides or fled the country.
damage Trump did?

You mean the Afghanistan withdrawal?

What damage are you talking about, Mr Supply SGT?
 
Last edited:
Well, this doesn't look good. Remember, folks, Trump only hires the best people!



A police report on Pete Hegseth’s alleged sexual assault of a woman in 2017 was released on Wednesday, providing details into allegations that could derail the Fox News host’s Senate confirmation.

The Monterey Police Department released the 24-page report to news organization Mediaite after initially denying to do so, explaining that Hegseth’s request for a copy in 2021 waived its obligation to keep it under wraps.

The alleged assault took place during a Republican women's conference during which Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Department of Defense, was a keynote speaker. In his statement to police, Hegseth said he did have sex with the accuser and corroborated details from her account, but characterized the encounter as consensual.

Hegseth’s alleged victim said she had a drink at a sports bar attached to the hotel before “things got fuzzy,” telling a nurse who administered her sexual assault test that she suspected something was slipped into her drink.

She said she didn’t recall Hegseth leading her to his hotel room, but she “remembered saying 'no' a lot,” and recalled the Fox News host taking her phone from her and blocking her path to the door with his body.

The alleged victim told police her next memory was being underneath Hegseth in his hotel room with the ex-National Guardsman’s dog tags dangling over her face. She added that Hegseth did not wear a condom and ejaculated on her body, details Hegseth confirmed. The victim could not remember how she returned to her hotel room but said she woke up there.



Commentary- Seriously, this is the best you guys can come up with, a guy who is completely unqualified who roofies a chick to have sex with her?

Does this mean the walls are closing in? :lol:
 
Police reports are inadmissible as evidence in a court of law.

Democrats do not care about the rule of law.

Democrats do not believe in justice
 
Not a day goes by where you open the newspaper without reading American decline
 
15th post
It's true!

CNN is also reporting that he likes to bite the heads off Latino and trans puppies.
since when are puppies now becoming trans? C'mon folks, leave the puppies out of this
 
twitter??

"So it is accurate to say that Donald Trump was liable for battery and defamation, but not that he was found guilty of battery and defamation."

The jury could have found Trump liable of battery based on the preponderance of evidence for rape, sexual abuse or forcible touching, of which they found Trump was liable for sexual abuse, Florey explained.

"All three possible findings [rape, sexual abuse, forcible touching] are forms of battery, so a finding that Mr. Trump had engaged in any of these would be sufficient to hold him liable for battery," she said.

"The most precise way to say it would be something like, 'The jury found by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll and therefore was liable for battery.'"

Florey added that to satisfy liability for rape, Carroll would "have had to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Trump penetrated her with his penis."
 
How can you use the word “seriously” when your question is based on pure unsupported guesswork?

Why is it unsupported guesswork? The police report is a matter of record and should have absolutely come up during a background check.

So either the people vetting Hegseth missed this, or they knew about it and didn't care.

Neither of which makes them look good.
 
Back
Top Bottom