Okay Montrovant, how many people were hit? because all along or where the car pass it has no blood on the gravel and around the wounded. we saw in one of the videos people hold a sheet to hide the person injured otherwise the others we saw there was no blood on people or on the street. or i miss it And all those who hit the car and they hit behind the car why not try to hit the driver ? when there was the attack in Nice on 14 July 2016 we had heroes who tried to arrest the terrorist Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel who was driving a big van they climbed on the passenger side to try to control it but he was armed.
Graphic Warning.
People ran at the truck in Nice from behind, and grabbed onto it from the side. It's also a bit different to attack a truck like that than a car like the Challenger. The people in Nice also had more time to react to the truck. The Charlottesville incident was over in seconds. And not every person who went after the car in Charlottesville went after it from the back.
Again, there is blood in videos of the Charlottesville incident, just not a lot. Not all injuries cause a bunch of bleeding. You seem to be assuming there should have been large pools of blood, but why? What injuries did people sustain that would have caused a great loss of blood? The one man who is seen flipped over in the air in a still photo broke a leg. I don't know what other injuries were sustained, not even Heather Heyer's injuries. People can be hurt or killed without doing a lot of bleeding. Then, of course, it's possible that there was blood not seen in the videos.
I'd also like to point out that in a previous post, you asked why people would go after the car, because it is normal to go away from danger. However, you then posted a video of the Nice attack, in which people went after the truck, moving toward the danger. You can't have it both ways. Either everyone would go away from the danger, or some people have different reactions.