Super-criminal female driver kills 3. Gets 3-9 yrs prison. Says "Why should I apologize? I'm as much as a victim as they are."

AA1QLeK3.img


The damn prosecutor only asked for 5-15 years.
Time has not been kind to Scott Baio.

Or is that Freddie Prinze Jr.?

Or Steve Perry?
 
The prosecutor charged her with manslaughter when he should have said murder.
Thankfully we are still, mostly, a nation of laws and a charge of murder requires evidence of intent. The key distinction between manslaughter and murder is the presence of malice aforethought, which is the intent to kill or serious harm another human being.
 
Thankfully we are still, mostly, a nation of laws and a charge of murder requires evidence of intent. The key distinction between manslaughter and murder is the presence of malice aforethought, which is the intent to kill or serious harm another human being.

She was doing 68 in a 25, you idiot. There is your malice aforethought. BTW there is also a type of murder called felony murder where no intent to harm anyone is required. You are a legal moron.
 
She was doing 68 in a 25, you idiot. There is your malice aforethought. BTW there is also a type of murder called felony murder where no intent to harm anyone is required. You are a legal moron.
Don't buy it. Did she know the victims before hand? No, so there could be no malice. Felony murder does not apply, that applies to people who assist in a murder, for example it applies to drivers of get away cars where a murder was committed during a bank robbery.
 
Moron. She CHOSE to drive 68 in a 25 zone. There is your intent.
You might want to get a refund on your law degree.

A reckless driver who kills someone is generally charged with manslaughter, as murder requires an intent to kill that reckless drivers lack. Manslaughter is typically defined as an unlawful killing without the malice or premeditation required for murder, and is often categorized as involuntary manslaughter when it results from reckless actions like drunk or dangerous driving.
  • Manslaughter: The key distinction is that manslaughter does not require intent to kill. Instead, it's a killing resulting from a reckless or criminally negligent act, such as a fatal accident caused by speeding or driving under the influence.
  • Murder: This is a more serious charge reserved for killings that are committed with "malice aforethought," meaning there was intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm.
  • Vehicular Manslaughter: This specific legal term describes the unlawful killing of a person through negligent or reckless driving and does not require malice aforethought or premeditated intent to kill.
 
You might want to get a refund on your law degree.

A reckless driver who kills someone is generally charged with manslaughter, as murder requires an intent to kill that reckless drivers lack. Manslaughter is typically defined as an unlawful killing without the malice or premeditation required for murder, and is often categorized as involuntary manslaughter when it results from reckless actions like drunk or dangerous driving.
  • Manslaughter: The key distinction is that manslaughter does not require intent to kill. Instead, it's a killing resulting from a reckless or criminally negligent act, such as a fatal accident caused by speeding or driving under the influence.
  • Murder: This is a more serious charge reserved for killings that are committed with "malice aforethought," meaning there was intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm.
  • Vehicular Manslaughter: This specific legal term describes the unlawful killing of a person through negligent or reckless driving and does not require malice aforethought or premeditated intent to kill.
Lots of drunkdrivers that kill are charged w murder. THINK
 
Back
Top Bottom