Haven't Textbooks Taught Critical Race Theory For Decades??

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

Surely, you can see how critical race theory has morphed into communist shit, right?

And enough of this shit about who called the war what. It definitely was a war for independence of some states from the union, right? Do you know what the Confederates called Gettysburg? Manassas Junction. Do you know what the Japanese call the Pearl Harbor Attack? Operation Hawaii.

You could be a top notch poster if you would ditch the "racism" bit and quit acting like Conspiracy Brother.

and the holocaust was simply about Germany's quest to be independent from Jews.....even if they had to exterminate a few million of them......

Why can't we appreciate Germany's struggle for independence....

That is how goofy you racist revisionists sound

Dumbass.

The South ALWAYS called it the war of independence or the war of northern aggression. Who is the reviser here?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

The teaching of history is a powerful tool in the armoury of the right and any sort of revisionism is obviously communism.

This is reinforced by bonehead pop culture. Films like The Alamo promote the image of freedom loving Texans fighting evil Santana.The reality was somewhat different. Mexico had abolished slavery by this time and it was one of the bones of contention.

Its the same bollox about the War of Independence. Whitewashed bullshit.

Hush. You know nothing of American History.

I seem to know a bit more than you do. Its because I read books.

Heres a book you could read.
Rough Crossings by Simon Schama
He is a historian rather than a culture warrior.

I read this before watching The Patriot a Mel Gibson movie that explained how 1776 was fought to free the slaves. On the contrary, the brits offered freedom to any slaves that came over to their side. They pretty much kept their promise and the freed slaves were eventually settled in Sierra Leone.
The loyal freedom loving slaves also received their reward by being freed less than a century later. They could then start their pursuit of happiness.

 

[TNHarley]

You compare revere and ross to a rich woman?

He didn't compare them, numbnuts. But i see you managed to reach like Stretch Armstrong to find something to vomit your white grievances on.

The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.
Dumbfuck

Refute it......

Why wouldn't one of the richest women in the country not be taught about -- she was definitely more wealthy than Betsy Ross....and she was definitely an abolitionist....

Thought you conservatives liked abolitionists...especially self made wealthy abolitionists

Guess not......wrong color

I see nothing wrong with her story being taught. Its a story of ambition and empowerment.
I just think its asinine to compare what she did to betsy and paul.
Its desperation.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You compare revere and ross to a rich woman?

He didn't compare them, numbnuts. But i see you managed to reach like Stretch Armstrong to find something to vomit your white grievances on.

The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.
Dumbfuck

Refute it......

Why wouldn't one of the richest women in the country not be taught about -- she was definitely more wealthy than Betsy Ross....and she was definitely an abolitionist....

Thought you conservatives liked abolitionists...especially self made wealthy abolitionists

Guess not......wrong color

The difference being Betsy Ross risked her life to make that flag. Mary Ellen Pleasant did nothing to secure a place in history beyond being a footnote. She was rich. So was Molly Brown.

 

[TNHarley]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

The teaching of history is a powerful tool in the armoury of the right and any sort of revisionism is obviously communism.

This is reinforced by bonehead pop culture. Films like The Alamo promote the image of freedom loving Texans fighting evil Santana.The reality was somewhat different. Mexico had abolished slavery by this time and it was one of the bones of contention.

Its the same bollox about the War of Independence. Whitewashed bullshit.

Hush. You know nothing of American History.

I seem to know a bit more than you do. Its because I read books.

Heres a book you could read.
Rough Crossings by Simon Schama
He is a historian rather than a culture warrior.

I read this before watching The Patriot a Mel Gibson movie that explained how 1776 was fought to free the slaves. On the contrary, the brits offered freedom to any slaves that came over to their side. They pretty much kept their promise and the freed slaves were eventually settled in Sierra Leone.
The loyal freedom loving slaves also received their reward by being freed less than a century later. They could then start their pursuit of happiness.

It wasnt fought to free slaves. Lincoln supported the FIRST 13th amendment that would make slavery legal forever.
Even though he supported forever slavery, they still went to war.
Even lincoln himself stated his aggression was over the economy.
Your foreigner revisionism is nauseating.
Please stop spreading lies, donald trump.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

The teaching of history is a powerful tool in the armoury of the right and any sort of revisionism is obviously communism.

This is reinforced by bonehead pop culture. Films like The Alamo promote the image of freedom loving Texans fighting evil Santana.The reality was somewhat different. Mexico had abolished slavery by this time and it was one of the bones of contention.

Its the same bollox about the War of Independence. Whitewashed bullshit.

Hush. You know nothing of American History.

I seem to know a bit more than you do. Its because I read books.

Heres a book you could read.
Rough Crossings by Simon Schama
He is a historian rather than a culture warrior.

I read this before watching The Patriot a Mel Gibson movie that explained how 1776 was fought to free the slaves. On the contrary, the brits offered freedom to any slaves that came over to their side. They pretty much kept their promise and the freed slaves were eventually settled in Sierra Leone.
The loyal freedom loving slaves also received their reward by being freed less than a century later. They could then start their pursuit of happiness.

Enemies making subversive promises is nothing new. The war for independence was not a war to free the slaves.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You compare revere and ross to a rich woman?

He didn't compare them, numbnuts. But i see you managed to reach like Stretch Armstrong to find something to vomit your white grievances on.

The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.
Dumbfuck

Refute it......

Why wouldn't one of the richest women in the country not be taught about -- she was definitely more wealthy than Betsy Ross....and she was definitely an abolitionist....

Thought you conservatives liked abolitionists...especially self made wealthy abolitionists

Guess not......wrong color

Oh, your fragile black ass must be REALLY chapped that nobody gives a fuck about either of those two.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

The teaching of history is a powerful tool in the armoury of the right and any sort of revisionism is obviously communism.

This is reinforced by bonehead pop culture. Films like The Alamo promote the image of freedom loving Texans fighting evil Santana.The reality was somewhat different. Mexico had abolished slavery by this time and it was one of the bones of contention.

Its the same bollox about the War of Independence. Whitewashed bullshit.

Hush. You know nothing of American History.

I seem to know a bit more than you do. Its because I read books.

Heres a book you could read.
Rough Crossings by Simon Schama
He is a historian rather than a culture warrior.

I read this before watching The Patriot a Mel Gibson movie that explained how 1776 was fought to free the slaves. On the contrary, the brits offered freedom to any slaves that came over to their side. They pretty much kept their promise and the freed slaves were eventually settled in Sierra Leone.
The loyal freedom loving slaves also received their reward by being freed less than a century later. They could then start their pursuit of happiness.

Enemies making subversive promises is nothing new. The war for independence was not a war to free the slaves.

mel Gibson thinks it was. He told his "black friends" that things would change.

 

[Slade3200]

Were there black contributors to history? Yes. They just didn't contribute very much.

How do you know?

How many modern day civilizations were created by a black based country vs modern civilizations that exist by other ethnicities across the entire world?

How many black people have created on their own corporations vs others across the entire world?

How many of mankind's keystone to evolution as a species were created by blacks vs others? Blacks don't care about advancing so that's why they don't do much to create a means to improve the world and instead sit in mostly 3rd world countries, or 3rd rate neighborhoods in other people countries.

The world's history shows us that while they do do some important things and have made some advances but overall have done little across the world compared to Asians and and white people, or even the Greeks.

It's no secret they aren't as ambitious as everyone else and it's been shown as such since mankind started recording it's history. But few care about facts and history, only what supports their feelings. Like everyone blames whitey for enslaving blacky, but no one stopped to think "who sold the blacks into slavery?" Oh that's right, it was other blacks but that doesn't fit the narrative of whitey is bad. Just like no one wants to admit the number one killer of blacks is other blacks. People only see what they want to see.

You seem more concerned of protecting whitey from scrutiny and less concerned with facing the reality and effects of what slavery did to a large majority of the black race. Thats too bad

You want to change reality to give blacks an unearned and undeserved place in history.

Today blacks need slavery. They rely on it. Slavery is the very foundation of what they are. Without that history of slavery, there is no excuse for their violent criminality. Without slavery there is no excuse for a lack of achievement. Without the benefit of slavery blacks are just like everyone else. They certainly don't want that.

You think I want to change reality?! how so?

By fashioning minor achievements by blacks into major contributions.

Which minor achievements am I trying to fashion as major contributions. Be specific about what I've said. Since we both know you can't I'll just accept your apology now. Very big of you just don't lie about my positions again. Thanks

 

[TNHarley]

Nobody ever heard of victoria woodhall and she was rich, first woman to run for president, and first female stockbroker on wall street.
I bet if she was white, we would have heard about her!
Oh wait, she was.
DERP

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Who was the greatest basketball player of all time?

Who?


WHO?


Yes. Larry Bird. That's correct. White dude.

SUCK IT, BLACK PEOPLE!!!!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Were there black contributors to history? Yes. They just didn't contribute very much.

How do you know?

How many modern day civilizations were created by a black based country vs modern civilizations that exist by other ethnicities across the entire world?

How many black people have created on their own corporations vs others across the entire world?

How many of mankind's keystone to evolution as a species were created by blacks vs others? Blacks don't care about advancing so that's why they don't do much to create a means to improve the world and instead sit in mostly 3rd world countries, or 3rd rate neighborhoods in other people countries.

The world's history shows us that while they do do some important things and have made some advances but overall have done little across the world compared to Asians and and white people, or even the Greeks.

It's no secret they aren't as ambitious as everyone else and it's been shown as such since mankind started recording it's history. But few care about facts and history, only what supports their feelings. Like everyone blames whitey for enslaving blacky, but no one stopped to think "who sold the blacks into slavery?" Oh that's right, it was other blacks but that doesn't fit the narrative of whitey is bad. Just like no one wants to admit the number one killer of blacks is other blacks. People only see what they want to see.

You seem more concerned of protecting whitey from scrutiny and less concerned with facing the reality and effects of what slavery did to a large majority of the black race. Thats too bad

You want to change reality to give blacks an unearned and undeserved place in history.

Today blacks need slavery. They rely on it. Slavery is the very foundation of what they are. Without that history of slavery, there is no excuse for their violent criminality. Without slavery there is no excuse for a lack of achievement. Without the benefit of slavery blacks are just like everyone else. They certainly don't want that.

You think I want to change reality?! how so?

By fashioning minor achievements by blacks into major contributions.

Which minor achievements am I trying to fashion as major contributions. Be specific about what I've said. Since we both know you can't I'll just accept your apology now. Very big of you just don't lie about my positions again. Thanks

The buying and selling of real estate is a minor achievement and did nothing to change the course of history. You get no apology. You have to make it up yourself. Blacks have very little achievement to secure a place in history. Passing as white is not a major contribution. After all Gentleman Jack passed as a man and kept the mine open.

 

[Slade3200]

Were there black contributors to history? Yes. They just didn't contribute very much.

How do you know?

How many modern day civilizations were created by a black based country vs modern civilizations that exist by other ethnicities across the entire world?

How many black people have created on their own corporations vs others across the entire world?

How many of mankind's keystone to evolution as a species were created by blacks vs others? Blacks don't care about advancing so that's why they don't do much to create a means to improve the world and instead sit in mostly 3rd world countries, or 3rd rate neighborhoods in other people countries.

The world's history shows us that while they do do some important things and have made some advances but overall have done little across the world compared to Asians and and white people, or even the Greeks.

It's no secret they aren't as ambitious as everyone else and it's been shown as such since mankind started recording it's history. But few care about facts and history, only what supports their feelings. Like everyone blames whitey for enslaving blacky, but no one stopped to think "who sold the blacks into slavery?" Oh that's right, it was other blacks but that doesn't fit the narrative of whitey is bad. Just like no one wants to admit the number one killer of blacks is other blacks. People only see what they want to see.

You seem more concerned of protecting whitey from scrutiny and less concerned with facing the reality and effects of what slavery did to a large majority of the black race. Thats too bad

You want to change reality to give blacks an unearned and undeserved place in history.

Today blacks need slavery. They rely on it. Slavery is the very foundation of what they are. Without that history of slavery, there is no excuse for their violent criminality. Without slavery there is no excuse for a lack of achievement. Without the benefit of slavery blacks are just like everyone else. They certainly don't want that.

You think I want to change reality?! how so?

By fashioning minor achievements by blacks into major contributions.

Which minor achievements am I trying to fashion as major contributions. Be specific about what I've said. Since we both know you can't I'll just accept your apology now. Very big of you just don't lie about my positions again. Thanks

The buying and selling of real estate is a minor achievement and did nothing to change the course of history. You get no apology. You have to make it up yourself. Blacks have very little achievement to secure a place in history. Passing as white is not a major contribution. After all Gentleman Jack passed as a man and kept the mine open.

I already accepted your apology, its ok... when you lack substance you lie, I'm used to it from you. We both know what I've actually said and what you pretend that I've said. Like this new real estate argument which is the first I've heard of the topic. Fact is you think you are waaaay smarter than you actually are because you have a closed mind. It is entertaining watching you twist yourself into a pretzel trying to explain yourself though. thanks for that

 

[whitehall]

Doesn't the fact that there are "black scholars" indicate a healthy non racist environment? Irish Americans can mire themselves in hatred for the English and every race has been enslaved at one time or another throughout history. Today Black rappers make more money than some emerging African nations, we have race based affirmative action programs and you can't watch a program on T.V. that doesn't have Shaq O'Neill peddling some junk that he probably wouldn't use himself. We saw democrats try to derail the nomination of eminently qualified Black Supreme Court Justice because he was a republican and recently a Black U.S. Senator that democrats call "uncle Tim" because he is a republican. If the democrat party would get a handle on their own systemic racism it would go a long way towards healing old wounds.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Were there black contributors to history? Yes. They just didn't contribute very much.

How do you know?

How many modern day civilizations were created by a black based country vs modern civilizations that exist by other ethnicities across the entire world?

How many black people have created on their own corporations vs others across the entire world?

How many of mankind's keystone to evolution as a species were created by blacks vs others? Blacks don't care about advancing so that's why they don't do much to create a means to improve the world and instead sit in mostly 3rd world countries, or 3rd rate neighborhoods in other people countries.

The world's history shows us that while they do do some important things and have made some advances but overall have done little across the world compared to Asians and and white people, or even the Greeks.

It's no secret they aren't as ambitious as everyone else and it's been shown as such since mankind started recording it's history. But few care about facts and history, only what supports their feelings. Like everyone blames whitey for enslaving blacky, but no one stopped to think "who sold the blacks into slavery?" Oh that's right, it was other blacks but that doesn't fit the narrative of whitey is bad. Just like no one wants to admit the number one killer of blacks is other blacks. People only see what they want to see.

You seem more concerned of protecting whitey from scrutiny and less concerned with facing the reality and effects of what slavery did to a large majority of the black race. Thats too bad

You want to change reality to give blacks an unearned and undeserved place in history.

Today blacks need slavery. They rely on it. Slavery is the very foundation of what they are. Without that history of slavery, there is no excuse for their violent criminality. Without slavery there is no excuse for a lack of achievement. Without the benefit of slavery blacks are just like everyone else. They certainly don't want that.

You think I want to change reality?! how so?

By fashioning minor achievements by blacks into major contributions.

Which minor achievements am I trying to fashion as major contributions. Be specific about what I've said. Since we both know you can't I'll just accept your apology now. Very big of you just don't lie about my positions again. Thanks

The buying and selling of real estate is a minor achievement and did nothing to change the course of history. You get no apology. You have to make it up yourself. Blacks have very little achievement to secure a place in history. Passing as white is not a major contribution. After all Gentleman Jack passed as a man and kept the mine open.

I already accepted your apology, its ok... when you lack substance you lie, I'm used to it from you. We both know what I've actually said and what you pretend that I've said. Like this new real estate argument which is the first I've heard of the topic. Fact is you think you are waaaay smarter than you actually are because you have a closed mind. It is entertaining watching you twist yourself into a pretzel trying to explain yourself though. thanks for that

You are an enemy. I accept that. You cannot now deny what claims you made. You lie like a Democrat.

 

[Slade3200]

Were there black contributors to history? Yes. They just didn't contribute very much.

How do you know?

How many modern day civilizations were created by a black based country vs modern civilizations that exist by other ethnicities across the entire world?

How many black people have created on their own corporations vs others across the entire world?

How many of mankind's keystone to evolution as a species were created by blacks vs others? Blacks don't care about advancing so that's why they don't do much to create a means to improve the world and instead sit in mostly 3rd world countries, or 3rd rate neighborhoods in other people countries.

The world's history shows us that while they do do some important things and have made some advances but overall have done little across the world compared to Asians and and white people, or even the Greeks.

It's no secret they aren't as ambitious as everyone else and it's been shown as such since mankind started recording it's history. But few care about facts and history, only what supports their feelings. Like everyone blames whitey for enslaving blacky, but no one stopped to think "who sold the blacks into slavery?" Oh that's right, it was other blacks but that doesn't fit the narrative of whitey is bad. Just like no one wants to admit the number one killer of blacks is other blacks. People only see what they want to see.

You seem more concerned of protecting whitey from scrutiny and less concerned with facing the reality and effects of what slavery did to a large majority of the black race. Thats too bad

You want to change reality to give blacks an unearned and undeserved place in history.

Today blacks need slavery. They rely on it. Slavery is the very foundation of what they are. Without that history of slavery, there is no excuse for their violent criminality. Without slavery there is no excuse for a lack of achievement. Without the benefit of slavery blacks are just like everyone else. They certainly don't want that.

You think I want to change reality?! how so?

By fashioning minor achievements by blacks into major contributions.

Which minor achievements am I trying to fashion as major contributions. Be specific about what I've said. Since we both know you can't I'll just accept your apology now. Very big of you just don't lie about my positions again. Thanks

The buying and selling of real estate is a minor achievement and did nothing to change the course of history. You get no apology. You have to make it up yourself. Blacks have very little achievement to secure a place in history. Passing as white is not a major contribution. After all Gentleman Jack passed as a man and kept the mine open.

I already accepted your apology, its ok... when you lack substance you lie, I'm used to it from you. We both know what I've actually said and what you pretend that I've said. Like this new real estate argument which is the first I've heard of the topic. Fact is you think you are waaaay smarter than you actually are because you have a closed mind. It is entertaining watching you twist yourself into a pretzel trying to explain yourself though. thanks for that

You are an enemy. I accept that. You cannot now deny what claims you made. You lie like a Democrat.

I can easily deny it and when you can’t show a quote or proof from anything I’ve written on a message board where everything is written in black and white then I win the argument. Thanks for playing but it’s just too easy to beat you

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You have only proven that blacks with rare exceptions do not deserve a place in history books.

 

[Slade3200]

You have only proven that blacks with rare exceptions do not deserve a place in history books.

I haven’t made any points even closely related to that. I’ve proven that you lie about what others say as evidenced AGAIN by this last statement of yours. Pretty pathetic

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We Found the Textbooks of Senators Who Oppose The 1619 Project and Suddenly Everything Makes Sense

White people love critical race theories.

www.theroot.com

"While they [conservatives] generally oppose Critical Race Theory, the academic movement started by Black scholars, they have historically embraced the uncapitalized version of race theory -- but because so many see whiteness as a default, they don’t understand that their entire education has already been racialized. The fact that most people know about Betsy Ross’ amazing ability to sew or Paul Revere’s talent for riding and yelling, but have never heard of Mary Ellen Pleasant or Colonel Tye is proof that the American education system is filtered through the lens of whiteness.

For centuries, this country’s schools have perpetuated a whitewashed version of history that either erases or reduces the story of Black America [and others] down to a B-plot in the American script - because the white-centric interpretation of our national past is so commonly accepted, most white people have convinced themselves that anything that varies from the Caucasian interpretation must be a lie."

Now, what was interesting was that this article went on to research the history books of GOP Senators who are so triggered by CRT -- to see why they are so fixated on teaching the version of history they were taught.....like Senator Marsha Blackburn who was taught using history books collated by United Daughters Of The Confederacy...hmmm....in it they learned that the Brown vs Board decision was a travesty and that slaves may have been human chattel, but they were mostly treated like family.....hmmmm.....no wonder accurate tellings of history would trigger her so much...she was raised to believe a whole lie....

How about Senator Cotton from Arkansas.....his high school textbook from 1995 taught about slavery in a very similar way that Marsha learned decades ago...it even referred to the Civil War, not as the Civil War -- but the war for Southern Independence...Again, this was 1995.....it also made sure that students didn't feel that "War of Independence" was over slavery..I repeat...this was 1995....so no wonder Cotton is triggered by accurate tellings of history...and no wonder he dog whistles to Neo-Confederates so much....


So for all the hand wringing we see over "Critical Race Theory" -- truth is; a certain purposely incomplete and flawed version of race theory has been taught in this country for generations....And one should ask themselves, why this need to rewrite a history that is easily debunked and proven false with just a minor bit of research?? Would you feel that same way if our textbooks began to see the "good side" of the Nazi Holocaust....would you be lecturing holocaust survivors and their descendants about how it wasn't really that many Jews exterminated and how some Jews in concentration camps were treated like family?? Or is it still too soon to try to rewrite that history?

BlahBlahBlah.

It's time for us to all admit that CRT is FACTUALLY communist bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_SchoolThe Frankfurt School perspective of critical investigation (open-ended and self-critical) is based upon Freudian, Marxist and Hegelian premises of idealist philosophy.[2] To fill the omissions of 19th-century classical Marxism, which did not address 20th-century social problems, they applied the methods of antipositivist sociology, of psychoanalysis, and of existentialism.[3] The School's sociologic works derived from syntheses of the thematically pertinent works of Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and Karl Marx, of Sigmund Freud and Max Weber, and of Georg Simmel and Georg Lukács.[4][5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theoryIn sociology and political philosophy, "Critical Theory" means the Western-Marxist philosophy of the Frankfurt School, developed in Germany in the 1930s and drawing on the ideas of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Though a "critical theory" or a "critical social theory" may have similar elements of thought, capitalizing Critical Theory as if it were a proper noun stresses the intellectual lineage specific to the Frankfurt School.
Modern critical theory has also been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci, as well as second-generation Frankfurt School scholars, notably Jürgen Habermas. In Habermas's work, critical theory transcended its theoretical roots in German idealism and progressed closer to American pragmatism. Concern for social "base and superstructure" is one of the remaining Marxist philosophical concepts in much
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theoryCritical race theory originated in the mid-1970s in the writings of several American legal scholars, including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, Cheryl Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari Matsuda, and Patricia J. Williams.[1] It emerged as a movement by the 1980s, reworking theories of critical legal studies (CLS) with more focus on race.[4] Both critical race theory and critical legal studies are rooted in critical theory, which argues that social problems are influenced and created more by societal structures and cultural assumptions than by individual and psychological factors.[5]

Quit peddling communist BULLSHIT for the SOLE purpose of installing said commie shit.

Anytime you feel the need to post shit about your bullshit CRT, I will be here to set the communist record straight.

 

[Polishprince]

And if you are wondering who Mary Ellen Pleasant was.....she was one of the richest people in the state of California during the mid 1800's -- but she had to "pass for white"for awhile to go about building her wealth...but I am sure many white folks also had to "pass for white" at that time too..right?

Nowadays, White People often are forced to pass for people of color.

Its interesting how that worm has turned.
From Sen. Warren to Rachel Dolezal to Shaun King, Chief Jay Strongbow and B. Hussein O., whites pretending to be POC's to advance their careers has been a critical angle. Does anyone really think that the Barry Soetoro would have been nominated if he didn't pretend to be black? I remember the Rev. Jesse Jackson threatening to Literally Emasculate Barry at a big event over the issue.