Curried Goats
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 31,242
- 11,287
- 1,283
I don't care what an old piece of parchment says. That isn't a rational reason to do something.The Constitution says nothing about "need" applying to the right to own firearms.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't care what an old piece of parchment says. That isn't a rational reason to do something.The Constitution says nothing about "need" applying to the right to own firearms.
Rs are exactly the same.
![]()
I've more confidence in that old piece of parchment than the raving of a gay white male pretending to be black.I don't care what an old piece of parchment says. That isn't a rational reason to do something.![]()
Which is stupid, because arming the population was the best way for them to be held accountable by the people instead of creating another monarchy just like the one they had just thrown off.And to control their slaves. You keep trying to rush passed the fact that you're relying on the rationale of violent tyrant fucktards.
Wrong. We have seen over and over again through history how a dictator takes over his country's military and uses it to enslave the people. The first step is usually disarmament. It's a lot harder to subdue a population that has arms, as the Soviet Union found out in Afghanistan.Also, we no longer have to fear British retribution or need to control a slave population. And we have a standing army. All their reasons for needing guns no longer exist.
Then change what it says. Go ahead, there's a process. Make it a new piece of parchment so you'll think it's valuable.I don't care what an old piece of parchment says. That isn't a rational reason to do something.![]()
Well of course. You're a Simp who's relying on the reasoning of absolute morons and their moron traditions.I've more confidence in that old piece of parchment than the raving of a gay white male pretending to be black.
Guns,Rifles and gun slingers are part of the American landscape.In the REAL world, we restrict gun ownership. That's why, in the REAL world - OUTSIDE of the USA, our levels of gun crime, murder, gun suicide, and injuries from being shot are almost non-existant outside of the USA.
Every study done OUTSIDE the USA, debunks all of the bullshit being fed to Americans by the NRA, but Americans are obsessed with their guns.
Yeah. That pesky Constitution offends your tender sensibilities.Well of course. You're a Simp who's relying on the reasoning of absolute morons and their moron traditions.![]()
I already went over this with another moron. All the second amendment allowed the population of deplorable white settler Americans to do is enforce tyranny. At no point did they use their second amendment rights to fight their own tyrannical regime. You're arguing with fantasy and cosplay about what you wish America was rather than what it actually was. The slave state they created was just as brutal, if not more so, than the monarchy they were trying to divorce themselves from.Which is stupid, because arming the population was the best way for them to be held accountable by the people instead of creating another monarchy just like the one they had just thrown off.
Washington and gun toting white Americans were brutal dictators.Wrong. We have seen over and over again through history how a dictator takes over his country's military and uses it to enslave the people. The first step is usually disarmament. It's a lot harder to subdue a population that has arms, as the Soviet Union found out in Afghanistan.
That's a different argument and I don't think I need to change it. I think packing the court with enough Justices who'll interpret it our way will suffice.Then change what it says. Go ahead, there's a process. Make it a new piece of parchment so you'll think it's valuable.
I already went over this with another moron. All the second amendment allowed the population of deplorable white settler Americans to do is enforce tyranny. At no point did they use their second amendment rights to fight their own tyrannical regime. You're arguing with fantasy and cosplay about what you wish America was rather than what it actually was. The slave state they created was just as brutal, if not more so, than the monarchy they were trying to divorce themselves from.
Washington and gun toting white Americans were brutal dictators.
That's a different argument and I don't think I need to change it. I think packing the court with enough Justices who'll interpret it our way will suffice.
Learn som history, Bingo. The 2nd amendment didn't exist during the early settlement of the continent.I already went over this with another moron. All the second amendment allowed the population of deplorable white settler Americans to do is enforce tyranny. At no point did they use their second amendment rights to fight their own tyrannical regime. You're arguing with fantasy and cosplay about what you wish America was rather than what it actually was. The slave state they created was just as brutal, if not more so, than the monarchy they were trying to divorce themselves from.
Washington and gun toting white Americans were brutal dictators.
That's a different argument and I don't think I need to change it. I think packing the court with enough Justices who'll interpret it our way will suffice.
Guns are Not People.They are inanimate objects used forThe real problem is people having access to guns. Whether they were militias of slavers, gangs of white kkk on citizen patrols, black inner city criminals, or troubled teens. The original rationale for having them was given to us by tyrants and it was irrational and nonsensical.
No amendments or Americans existed before the constitution was ratified you dumb Bingo. That should of probably clued you into the fact that I was talking about the first Americans.Learn som history, Bingo. The 2nd amendment didn't exist during the early settlement of the continent.
No amendments or Americans existed before the constitution was ratified you dumb Bingo. That should of probably clued you into the fact that I was talking about the first Americans.
They are also used for violence. A lot. I'm not blaming guns, I'm blaming people. People can't own guns for the same reason they shouldn't own bombs. Are you blaming bombs because you don't think people should have them? Think of a rational counter argument and try again.Guns are Not People.They are inanimate objects used for
protection,security and/or sport. I think even Cub scouts are
aware of that.I doubt many Westerns heros share yer take
on the rationale for the existence of guns in American culture.
What came first the gun or the Hero.
The Murderer or the Gun.
Again ... Guns are inanimate objects.
They make noise,by all means.They are incapable of
sticking their tongue out or cheating on a test.
Sassing back a teacher or urinating on the floor.
I'm not at fault for you not understanding words and context or history. All that was a failure of your own education.Horrible attempt at salvaging yourself, Bingo
I'm not at fault for you not understanding words and context or history. All that was a failure of your own education.
I'm good with my arguments. You've yet to make one, Struggle Bus.Bingo you're looking ridiculous as usual
Give it a rest, you and your socks impress nobody
There were no first Americans until after 1776. Bingo. You have no clue.No amendments or Americans existed before the constitution was ratified you dumb Bingo. That should of probably clued you into the fact that I was talking about the first Americans.
I'm good with my arguments. You've yet to make one, Struggle Bus.![]()