Has the 14th Amendments “Equal Protection Clause” Been Misinterpreted by the Courts?

[Monk-Eye]

" Not Entrepreneurs Rather Bureaucratic Sociopaths "

* Authoritarian Clown Shoes Reject Individualism *

Nobody Made you get a business license.

And you do not understand a distinction between protections and endowments , between negative liberties and positive liberties .

Basic premises presumed by non aggression principles are individualism that includes self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents ) .

If someone opens their doors to public access then discrimination between patrons of the public is not valid , save a contract to negotiate services where private discretion can be introduced ; alternatively , employee representation is subject to private discretion and it is not a policy that bureaucrats decide .

It may be that a state is obligated to procure products or services from companies that hire consistently with state non discrimination obligations , but otherwise the state should not be capable of issuing a directive for non discrimination policies upon private corporations .

 

[danielpalos]

" Not Entrepreneurs Rather Bureaucratic Sociopaths "

* Authoritarian Clown Shoes Reject Individualism *

Nobody Made you get a business license.

And you do not understand a distinction between protections and endowments , between negative liberties and positive liberties .

Basic premises presumed by non aggression principles are individualism that includes self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents ) .

If someone opens their doors to public access then discrimination between patrons of the public is not valid , save a contract to negotiate services where private discretion can be introduced ; alternatively , employee representation is subject to private discretion and it is not a policy that bureaucrats decide .

It may be that a state is obligated to procure products or services from companies that hire consistently with state non discrimination obligations , but otherwise the state should not be capable of issuing a directive for non discrimination policies upon private corporations .

You don't get to be a despot in public accommodation.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Free Enterprise Incompetent Government Thug "

* Loony Tunes *

You don't get to be a despot in public accommodation.

Are you stating that about yourself ?

 

[danielpalos]

" Free Enterprise Incompetent Government Thug "

* Loony Tunes *

You don't get to be a despot in public accommodation.

Are you stating that about yourself ?

lol. no. I understand natural rights are not just about guns.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Self Righteous Bureaucratic Hypocrites "

* Clueless Precept *

lol. no. I understand natural rights are not just about guns.

Any notion of the contemporary premise for " natural rights " , for " inalienable rights " , is pure idiocy .

Let us know when you are bold enough to create a corporation , choose your own employees and through your own personal volition , give it all away to a collective socialist , communist , cause .

 

[Slashsnake]

14th Amendment
If someone owns private property...a business...is it right for the federal government to dictate who they can and cannot serve?

Businesses aren't required to follow the U.S Constitution, but the courts interpret the laws like that anyways.

The courts are highly illogical... I'll give you a few examples.

1) Free speech. I have a right to free speech... A judge shouldn't be allowed to throw me in jail if I call him an asshole.
2) Free speech and religion. A ruling that failed to defend the Colorado baker's rights to not make a cake for a gay couple.
3) Free speech. Schools can regulate language and the clothing you wear.
4) Free speech. The Colorado baker is regulated, but my employer can fire me for using foul language.


The courts are clueless and sit unchecked by a Congress ran by goofy, elderly people.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Just Add Puritanical Manure "

* Private Despots *

Businesses aren't required to follow the U.S Constitution, but the courts interpret the laws like that anyways.

yahoo.com is in contention for king of comment censorship on the internet .

The constitution issues limits and prohibitions on government , but those limits and prohibitions do not extend to private property of despots .

 

[MarathonMike]

My father was a factory worker. I had no white privilege and fought my way up from the bottom. I’m sick and tired of crybaby blacks saying I had “white privilege”. Go fuck yourself.

Does anyone ever talk about Black Privilege? If you are Black and you work hard and stay out of trouble, there is no end of opportunity for you today. If you go for a job and compete with a White person of equal ability, you will get the job 9 times out of 10. If you apply for college, you will be selected over MORE qualified white applicants. Black Privilege is real.

 

[Bush92]

My father was a factory worker. I had no white privilege and fought my way up from the bottom. I’m sick and tired of crybaby blacks saying I had “white privilege”. Go fuck yourself.

Does anyone ever talk about Black Privilege? If you are Black and you work hard and stay out of trouble, there is no end of opportunity for you today. If you go for a job and compete with a White person of equal ability, you will get the job 9 times out of 10. If you apply for college, you will be selected over MORE qualified white applicants. Black Privilege is real.

Happens everyday. But white liberals living in the safety of the suburbia don’t get it. Soon they will feel the threat that lower middle-class and poor whites have felt for some time.

 

[Moonglow]

14th Amendment
If someone owns private property...a business...is it right for the federal government to dictate who they can and cannot serve?

I would think they don't have the right. Progressive think they should have completeView attachment 225023 control over everything you say or do.

That is not what a progressive is no matter how you try to twist the meaning of the word.

 

[Moonglow]

My father was a factory worker. I had no white privilege and fought my way up from the bottom. I’m sick and tired of crybaby blacks saying I had “white privilege”. Go fuck yourself.

Does anyone ever talk about Black Privilege? If you are Black and you work hard and stay out of trouble, there is no end of opportunity for you today. If you go for a job and compete with a White person of equal ability, you will get the job 9 times out of 10. If you apply for college, you will be selected over MORE qualified white applicants. Black Privilege is real.

There is such thing as "no end to opportunity".

 

[Moonglow]

My father was a factory worker. I had no white privilege and fought my way up from the bottom. I’m sick and tired of crybaby blacks saying I had “white privilege”. Go fuck yourself.

Does anyone ever talk about Black Privilege? If you are Black and you work hard and stay out of trouble, there is no end of opportunity for you today. If you go for a job and compete with a White person of equal ability, you will get the job 9 times out of 10. If you apply for college, you will be selected over MORE qualified white applicants. Black Privilege is real.

Happens everyday. But white liberals living in the safety of the suburbia don’t get it. Soon they will feel the threat that lower middle-class and poor whites have felt for some time.

Man talk about a defeatist attitude, you must be retired...It doesn't work that way in the real world most do not ever apply for any type of an advantage and everyone is ignorant to a company until they are trained or have OJT.

 

[Moonglow]

14th Amendment
If someone owns private property...a business...is it right for the federal government to dictate who they can and cannot serve?

Public accommodation laws do that.

It’s my money. Why do I have to accommodate everyone? Oh, the 1960’s happened and socialist force me too.

So the Constitution is a communist document along with the Declaration of Independence?

 

[Care4all]

14th Amendment
If someone owns private property...a business...is it right for the federal government to dictate who they can and cannot serve?

They can probably make their business a "Private Club" of some sort, if they do not want to serve the whole Public and the people they only want to serve, can be members only, maybe?

Of course that would likely cut their business in half or more, by not wanting to serve the whole public.

 

[Care4all]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

utter, ignorant, bull crud! No one is a slave if they are paid the same price as everyone, for the job they perform.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Simple Dichotomy With Contempt "

* Transgressions Beyond Adequate Measures *

That is not what a progressive is no matter how you try to twist the meaning of the word.

The " progressive " is inclined toward positive liberties of endowments through bureaucratic authoritarianism of government , rather than being inclined toward negative liberties of protection from bureaucratic authoritarianism of government and of protection for individual liberty from other private individuals .

 

[Moonglow]

" Simple Dichotomy With Contempt "

* Transgressions Beyond Adequate Measures *

That is not what a progressive is no matter how you try to twist the meaning of the word.

The " progressive " is inclined toward positive liberties of endowments through bureaucratic authoritarianism of government , rather than being inclined toward negative liberties of protection from bureaucratic authoritarianism of government and of protection for individual liberty from other private individuals .

That is closer to a liberal.

 

[Moonglow]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

utter, ignorant, bull crud! No one is a slave if they are paid the same price as everyone, for the job they perform.

They be a wage slave...

 

[Monk-Eye]

" One Liners No Clue "

" Due Tell "

That is closer to a liberal.

A " classical liberal " - a liberal - is inclined towards negative liberties as protections from bureaucratic authoritarianism of government , as well as protections of individualism from other private individuals .

A " conservative " is inclined towards bureaucratic authoritarianism of government , the consequences of which are not completely clear .

Perhaps you believe that " progressive " is analogous with utilitarianism that is non specific in its possible intentions until they are defined .

 

[ding]

14th Amendment
If someone owns private property...a business...is it right for the federal government to dictate who they can and cannot serve?

Has the 14th Amendments “Equal Protection Clause” Been Misinterpreted by the Courts?

Yes. 100%.