Has the 14th Amendments “Equal Protection Clause” Been Misinterpreted by the Courts?

[Wayne Adams]

I understand Madison, unlike the Right Wing.

Do you believe in or support socialism or communism?

We have a better understanding of economics now. We have a mixed market political-economy. Congress commands fiscal policy and our central bank commands monetary policy.

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

 

[danielpalos]

I understand Madison, unlike the Right Wing.

Do you believe in or support socialism or communism?

We have a better understanding of economics now. We have a mixed market political-economy. Congress commands fiscal policy and our central bank commands monetary policy.

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

 

[dblack]

I understand Madison, unlike the Right Wing.

Do you believe in or support socialism or communism?

We have a better understanding of economics now. We have a mixed market political-economy. Congress commands fiscal policy and our central bank commands monetary policy.

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

You gotta burn one down (or maybe two) to truly grok daniel's genius.

 

[justinacolmena]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

You can't open a coffee shop and serve whites only.

You can't systematically rob people of their tools and means of livelihood, and then charge them money for performing SERVICES for them, which they would, a priori, be able to do by themselves for themselves.

Right to bear arms vs. professional bodyguards, for instance.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

You can't open a coffee shop and serve whites only.

Not that I would find that desirable, but ... why not?

 

[Wayne Adams]

Do you believe in or support socialism or communism?

We have a better understanding of economics now. We have a mixed market political-economy. Congress commands fiscal policy and our central bank commands monetary policy.

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

 

[danielpalos]

We have a better understanding of economics now. We have a mixed market political-economy. Congress commands fiscal policy and our central bank commands monetary policy.

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

 

[Wayne Adams]

And that has exactly what to do with the 14th Amendment?

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

 

[danielpalos]

Your misunderstanding of our Command Economy.

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

 

[Wayne Adams]

I've expressed no view on that either way. So, you mean you were yanking my chain in your last posting and YOU don't even believe what it is your preaching? I still don't understand what it is you're selling.

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

 

[danielpalos]

The power to provide for the general welfare is general, not common like our common defense clause.

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

It must be. It is our form of social-ism.

 

[Wayne Adams]

How does that relate to the 14th Amendment?

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

It must be. It is our form of social-ism.

And so, finally I get somewhat of an answer. Did you, by any chance, vote for Bernie Sanders?

 

[danielpalos]

The general welfare is positive; we should have positive rights.

The general badfare should require negative rights.

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

It must be. It is our form of social-ism.

And so, finally I get somewhat of an answer. Did you, by any chance, vote for Bernie Sanders?

Social-ism must start with the social contract that defines it. We have a Constitution.

 

[justinacolmena]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

You can't open a coffee shop and serve whites only.

Not that I would find that desirable, but ... why not?

There's a lynch mob, and that's where talk up their hate without fear of federal charges for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and murder for hire.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

To force a business by law to perform labor for anyone for whom they would not voluntarily choose to perform such labor in the absence of such law is nothing less than mandated slavery.

You can't open a coffee shop and serve whites only.

Not that I would find that desirable, but ... why not?

There's a lynch mob, and that's where talk up their hate without fear of federal charges for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and murder for hire.

That doesn't answer the question.

 

[justinacolmena]

That doesn't answer the question.

I'm sick and tired of the Constitution-for-whites-only trope.

All men, that is, all humans, are created equal.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

That doesn't answer the question.

I'm sick and tired of the Constitution-for-whites-only trope.

All men, that is, all humans, are created equal.

Indeed they are.

 

[EGR one]

That doesn't answer the question.

I'm sick and tired of the Constitution-for-whites-only trope.

All men, that is, all humans, are created equal.

All humans are created equal under the law. It is fairly obvious that all humans are not created equal.

 

[Wayne Adams]

Your language is non-responsive and cryptic. Do you agree with any portion of socialism?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

It must be. It is our form of social-ism.

And so, finally I get somewhat of an answer. Did you, by any chance, vote for Bernie Sanders?

Social-ism must start with the social contract that defines it. We have a Constitution.

You are the most confusing man in the world. So, are you now saying you are in favor of a Republic?

 

[danielpalos]

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract.

Do you think the Constitution is a social contract?

It must be. It is our form of social-ism.

And so, finally I get somewhat of an answer. Did you, by any chance, vote for Bernie Sanders?

Social-ism must start with the social contract that defines it. We have a Constitution.

You are the most confusing man in the world. So, are you now saying you are in favor of a Republic?

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract. Ours defines a Republican form of Government.