Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

[berg80]

No, concerning is ties to Russia. I mean you guys are ******* hilarious. You act as if everything stems from the Steele dossier. That is not even close to the truth.

Right. It's already been well documented the dossier played a minor role is the acquisition of the FISA warrants. But there are some lies they just can't let go because it blows up their entire narrative if they do.

 

[Rawley]

The evidence IS RIGHT HERE IN THIS THREAD. I posted it. For the love of God, do you people have to be told when it is time to take a shit?

LOL Pam send you copy of the evidence? LOL

 

[Delldude]

All of this was already available to their special counsel.

Except the back and forth between Obama, Brennan Comey and others.

It strains credulity if they’re saying the documents they release show crimes when they don’t.

What crimes have been listed/charged?

 

[Winston]

LOL Pam send you copy of the evidence? LOL

No you stupid shit.

https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-Evidence-Obama-Subvert-President-Trump-2016-Victory-Election-July2025.pdf

The government did.

 

[berg80]

Of course there’s reason. This investigation is being managed by the Trump DoJ and we have reason to believe their department is infused with politics. Trump has a personal vendetta.

The investigation itself is inexplicable.

Not exactly. It provides another distraction for the minions and it satisfies trump's long standing desire to rewrite the history of the 2016 campaign.

 

[Rawley]

No you stupid shit.

https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-Evidence-Obama-Subvert-President-Trump-2016-Victory-Election-July2025.pdf

The government did.

LOL Do you even have the slightest clue? Ok, here's one ODNI - DOJ. Does that help "you stupid shit?" I doubt it.,

 

[Marener]

Well, this thread is about Pam Bondi and her office is the one submitting evidence to a GJ that you find inexplicable, even though you have no idea what this evidence is.

I don’t know all of what Bondi has said. It’s the criminal referral from Gabbard that promoted this so her statements on the matter are hardly irrelevant.

Of course we have an idea what the evidence is. They’ve been releasing it.

 

[The Duke]

Creating a world where the former president can be called to testify on a whim of Congress is a pretty big step.

These shitbags corrupted our government and need to be held accountable as much as possible within the law.
Americans want arrests, yesterday.
They subpoena Mueller, and he's in a memory care facility.

 

[Rawley]

I don’t know all of what Bondi has said. It’s the criminal referral from Gabbard that promoted this so her statements on the matter are hardly irrelevant.

Of course we have an idea what the evidence is. They’ve been releasing it.

Again this threat is about Bondi not Gabbard. And no, you have no idea what evidence they are presenting to the GJ, that's the whole premise of a GJ.

 

[Meister]

View attachment 1145290


View attachment 1145291

Trolling again???

 

[Winston]

Like I said, this shit is insulting and illuminating as well.

LOL Do you even have the slightest clue? Ok, here's one ODNI - DOJ. Does that help "you stupid shit?" I doubt it.,

God damn fool, you haven't even clicked the link to the PDF file I posted. DNI--right at the top, you ******* moron. I mean do you believe there is some top secret evidence that proves the allegations against the Obama administration? Hell, set your dinner table up tonight, you got guests coming, Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, the Sandman, hell, even the Great Pumpkin is going to show up.

Look, you can continue to play the fool, believe me, I won't be surprised.

 

[Marener]

Again this threat is about Bondi not Gabbard. And no, you have no idea what evidence they are presenting to the GJ, that's the whole premise of a GJ.

I don’t think it’s logical to attempt to separate them. I can understand why you want to do that. Ambiguity creates space, and permits the administrations apologists to avoid considering the basis of this investigation.

But it’s clear that this investigation stems from those releases.

I take this as a tacit admission that you don’t really know what this is all about.

 

[jc456]

No, Carter Page's first FISA warrant was in 2014.

yep, but who cares? Are you suggesting he was considered a russian asset then?

The one in 2016 was when he was working for Trump, but fk, nice deflection. It's all you ever have.

Reports: Carter Page Was Subject to FISA Warrant in 2013/2014

I have always recalled a nugget buried deep in a CNN report published in Aug. 4, 2017. The 61st paragraph of the report reads: "Page had been the subject of a secret intelligence surveillance warrant since 2014, earlier than had been previously reported, US officials briefed on the probe told...

www.justsecurity.org

Update: On Feb. 2, 2018, the New York Times’ annotation of the Nunes memo states, “In accusing the F.B.I. of omitting important information, this memo’s critics say the memo itself omits crucial context: other evidence that did not come from Mr. Steele, much of which remains classified. For example, it makes no note of the fact that Mr. Page attracted the F.B.I.’s interest in 2013, when agents came to believe that Russian spies were trying to recruit him.

 

[Rawley]

Like I said, this shit is insulting and illuminating as well.

God damn fool, you haven't even clicked the link to the PDF file I posted. DNI--right at the top, you ******* moron. I mean do you believe there is some top secret evidence that proves the allegations against the Obama administration? Hell, set your dinner table up tonight, you got guests coming, Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, the Sandman, hell, even the Great Pumpkin is going to show up.

Look, you can continue to play the fool, believe me, I won't be surprised.

OK. So, you are ignorant of the difference between the ODNI and the DOJ. Color me surprised. The letters confuse you?

 

[Winston]

OK. So, you are ignorant of the difference between the ODNI and the DOJ. Color me surprised. The letters confuse you?

Not DOJ, DNI--**** off idiot. The DNI is a person, he runs the ODNI. I mean this is some simple shit. The fact that you don't know these things reveals that you are clearly out of your element. Now run along, ask Mom to send you some more pizza rolls to the basement.

 

[Rawley]

I don’t think it’s logical to attempt to separate them.

Really? you don't see a difference between the ODNI and the DOJ? Have you met this poster Winston?

I understand why you want to do that. Ambiguity creates space, and permits the administrations apologists to avoid considering the basis of this investigation.

But it’s clear that this investigation stems from those releases.

I take this as a tacit admission that you don’t really know what this is all about.

You can take it however you want. Neither you nor I know what evidence is being presented to the GJ. But you seem convinced you do. LOL

 

[Rawley]

Not DOJ, DNI--**** off idiot. The DNI is a person, he runs the ODNI. I mean this is some simple shit. The fact that you don't know these things reveals that you are clearly out of your element. Now run along, ask Mom to send you some more pizza rolls to the basement.

Have a blessed life.

 

[Delldude]

But it’s clear that this investigation stems from those releases.

This investigation has been underway for months. It got to the point that it was decided to release doc's associated with the investigation.... criminal referrals probably preceeded release of the doc's.

take this as a tacit admission that you don’t really know what this is all about.

lol.....but you do.

It strains credulity if they’re saying the documents they release show crimes when they don’t.

Who's said that?

 

[jc456]

It doesn't matter, it's what was done afterward. Still no votes were touched right? Why did they need a report with anything but that?

Here's some additional verbiage. BTW, why were they even writing a report after the election?

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence

 

[Winston]

yep, but who cares? Are you suggesting he was considered a russian asset then?

The one in 2016 was when he was working for Trump, but fk, nice deflection. It's all you ever have.

Reports: Carter Page Was Subject to FISA Warrant in 2013/2014

I have always recalled a nugget buried deep in a CNN report published in Aug. 4, 2017. The 61st paragraph of the report reads: "Page had been the subject of a secret intelligence surveillance warrant since 2014, earlier than had been previously reported, US officials briefed on the probe told...

www.justsecurity.org

Update: On Feb. 2, 2018, the New York Times’ annotation of the Nunes memo states, “In accusing the F.B.I. of omitting important information, this memo’s critics say the memo itself omits crucial context: other evidence that did not come from Mr. Steele, much of which remains classified. For example, it makes no note of the fact that Mr. Page attracted the F.B.I.’s interest in 2013, when agents came to believe that Russian spies were trying to recruit him.

Damn dude, think for a minute. There is no doubt, Page was recruited by Russian agents. He most certainly was an asset. I mean he had this company, he was the sole employee. Like I said, he was known to be absolutely whackadoodle. His company had no assets under management that I can see. It had no revenue coming in. He shared an office with a damn wedding planner. WTF?

But hey, he could walk across an annex right to Trump Towers. Come on dude, red flags are flying everywhere with this dude.