Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

Yes for 210 days... that's what I said... after the 211th day she can be placed back in....
which,by definition, means the post is vacant.

Which, it basically is, when the unqualified and unfit Habba is doing the job.
 
It really began with Eric Holder. I was no fan of Bob McDonnell, but his prosecution was utter BS partisan politics.
 
It really began with Eric Holder. I was no fan of Bob McDonnell, but his prosecution was utter BS partisan politics.
"The trial triggered public outrage as evidence showed the Virginia Republican and his wife accepted over $175,000-worth of loans and gifts, such as vacations, designer clothes and a Rolex watch, from a businessman seeking the state’s help in promoting a tobacco-based dietary supplement."

Overturned on a technicality
 
Let's put aside that the court had the authority to name Habba's successor. The act by Bondi of making Habba the #2 in the attorney's office, a position that doesn't require Senate confirmation after Habba's temporary term had expired, in order to give her control of the office in the absence of a confirmed nominee for the #1 position, was an act of deceit. A circumvention of the need to have Habba confirmed because trump knew she wouldn't be after her numerous acts of sycophancy to him.

“Trump’s Department of Justice is once again criticizing a court that acted within its authority, continuing a pattern of publicly undermining judicial decisions and showing disregard for the rule of law and the separation of powers," they wrote. “The firing of a career public servant, lawfully appointed by the court, is another blatant attempt to intimidate anyone that doesn’t agree with them and undermine judicial independence."
Let’s say that the court was within its authority. Ok.

The Administration was within its authority, in return, in dismissing that court appointed replacement.

Too bad. So sad. 😎
(d) If an appointment expires under subsection (c)(2), the district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled. The order of appointment by the court shall be filed with the clerk of the court.

Either Bondi doesn't know the law or she intentionally violated it.
And the executive branch can still fire them.

This whole “separation of powers” thing really confuses you libtards.
 
"The trial triggered public outrage as evidence showed the Virginia Republican and his wife accepted over $175,000-worth of loans and gifts, such as vacations, designer clothes and a Rolex watch, from a businessman seeking the state’s help in promoting a tobacco-based dietary supplement."

Overturned on a technicality
Notice how the libtard ^ considers due process a “technicality.”
 
Your meltdown is cute

Have you ever met a party of people so incredibly sensitive to the smallest slight after excusing and rationalizing the most heinous actions for four years?

Understand that with democraps, it is all about making constant noise trying to vilify all things Trump. By constantly trying to claim they are the worst thing since Hitler, they hope to use it as cover to justify every crazy, extreme, radical action they do.
  1. Burning down car dealers - gotta protest Trump fascism!
  2. Trying to kill ICE agents - must stop Trump jack-booted thugs!
  3. Must try to protect illegal aliens - Trump is picking on these poor, innocent American citizens!
 
"The trial triggered public outrage as evidence showed the Virginia Republican and his wife accepted over $175,000-worth of loans and gifts, such as vacations, designer clothes and a Rolex watch, from a businessman seeking the state’s help in promoting a tobacco-based dietary supplement."

Overturned on a technicality
Technicality?

The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 what he did wasn't illegal.
 
Trump is doing exactly what he falsely accused President Biden of doing: weaponizing the DOJ.

Bondi was beyond corrupt in Florida – she’s even more corrupt now.
She'll end up like Guiliani.

If we're lucky.

She knows who & what is in those Epstein files. And Trump knows that SHE knows.

No honor among thieves. Or Trump's hacks.
 
Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​


Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.


Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.


 
Heard they're doing a new Lady Justice with Bondi.

View attachment 1145442
I heard that too.

1754448266691.webp
 
Joe Biden knows, he had them for four freaking years, putz.

And did nothing.

Maybe because Hunter is in them.
The files were sealed on a Federal judges orders, mouthbreather.
 
15th post
I don’t think he was asking his administration to enforce the law when they dropped the charges on people who were either his political allies or people whom he wanted to do him a favor.

Such as Eric Adams.
That’s cause you are a demafasict and think political prosecutions are the law, they aren’t

In fact it’s abnormal and fascist

Eric Adams was targeted by your fascist regime for calling our xiden for his illegal alien border surge policies
 
Back
Top Bottom