Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

(d) If an appointment expires under subsection (c)(2), the district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled. The order of appointment by the court shall be filed with the clerk of the court.
https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-28-judiciary-and-judicial-procedure/28-usc-sect-546/

Either Bondi doesn't know the law or she intentionally violated it.
Tell Schumer to stop stalling the process or Trump will fill every vacancy while the senate is out of town.... oh too late... get out the pen Trump...
 
Tell Schumer to stop stalling the process or Trump will fill every vacancy while the senate is out of town.... oh too late... get out the pen Trump...
Dotard hasn't nominated anyone for the #1 position.

Either Bondi doesn't know the law or she intentionally violated it.
 
Dotard hasn't nominated anyone for the #1 position.

Either Bondi doesn't know the law or she intentionally violated it.
We must be talking about different appointments...

Recent reports indicate that Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been confirmed as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital.
 
Tell Schumer to stop stalling the process or Trump will fill every vacancy while the senate is out of town.... oh too late... get out the pen Trump...

Can judges even appoint the U.S. attorney?​

Yes. A federal statute governing U.S. attorney vacancies specifies that if the attorney general's appointment of a U.S. attorney expires after 120 days, the district court can name a U.S. attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.

The law requires an order of appointment by the court to be filed with the clerk of the court.


BTW, GFY.
 
We must be talking about different appointments...

Recent reports indicate that Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been confirmed as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital.
They’re talking about Habba in SDNY. She’s past the 120 days that she’s allowed to act as the US attorney without senate confirmation.
 
Because he's going to find a way to put Habba back in that position.
He doesn't have to. He'll leave her as the #2 in the office, then not nominate someone for the #1 role, leaving Habba in charge. It's duplicity at its worst.
 

Can judges even appoint the U.S. attorney?​

Yes. A federal statute governing U.S. attorney vacancies specifies that if the attorney general's appointment of a U.S. attorney expires after 120 days, the district court can name a U.S. attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.

The law requires an order of appointment by the court to be filed with the clerk of the court.


BTW, GFY.
Smart move IMO... elections have consequences peach fuzz.... deal with it...

 
Smart move IMO... elections have consequences peach fuzz.... deal with it...

Thanks for admitting you are full of shit............and that Bondi broke the law.

"The reason why you have this 120-day deadline followed by judicial appointments was so that the president is incentivized to get someone confirmed because after 120 days, you lose the authority within the executive branch to control who is the U.S. attorney," Thomas Barry, an expert in constitutional law at the Cato Institute, told CBS News.
 
He doesn't have to. He'll leave her as the #2 in the office, then not nominate someone for the #1 role, leaving Habba in charge. It's duplicity at its worst.
She can fill the vacancy for 210 days... its the law buttface....
 
15th post
Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​


Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.


Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.
She's got that trophy in the bag, man. A record sure to stand for centuries I'd say.
 
Thanks for admitting you are full of shit............and that Bondi broke the law.

"The reason why you have this 120-day deadline followed by judicial appointments was so that the president is incentivized to get someone confirmed because after 120 days, you lose the authority within the executive branch to control who is the U.S. attorney," Thomas Barry, an expert in constitutional law at the Cato Institute, told CBS News.
Your side lost the election deal with it... its our rules in place now...
 
Thanks for admitting you are full of shit............and that Bondi broke the law.

"The reason why you have this 120-day deadline followed by judicial appointments was so that the president is incentivized to get someone confirmed because after 120 days, you lose the authority within the executive branch to control who is the U.S. attorney," Thomas Barry, an expert in constitutional law at the Cato Institute, told CBS News.
I beat you easy dude... because you don't do your homework and your news agencies lie like dogs.... easy peasy....
 
She's got that trophy in the bag, man. A record sure to stand for centuries I'd say.

Heard they're doing a new Lady Justice with Bondi.

52a89c_317ce28270b144f783f4746201cc1b1e~mv2.gif
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom