Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

Yeah, I read things from the case, it was based on Adams using a building without o fire department inspection.
It’s part of it. There’s also illegal campaign donations and accepting about $100,000 in gifts.

But that’s okay, I guess.

I guess you guys aren’t all that into law and order.
 
So, the enemies of the United States will work to destroy its leader with propaganda and people with grudges.

Yeah, real convincing.
 
And you’re still pretending the corruption didn’t exist.

Donoghue demonstrated loyalty to the country when Trump wanted loyalty to himself. That’s the principle I’m talking about. It’s meaningless to you.

Nope
 
Has Bondi told the world she is just Trump's "wingman"?
She’s made a joke out of the DoJ. It’s openly acting as a political arm without any real independence.
 
So, the enemies of the United States will work to destroy its leader with propaganda and people with grudges.

Yeah, real convincing.
Stop pretending as though you actually care.
 
Weaponization of our government seriously got rolling in the Clinton years.
Just wondering if you ever think about trying to substantiate the copious amounts of shit you constantly throw on the wall?
 
She’s made a joke out of the DoJ. It’s openly acting as a political arm without any real independence

Can you read simple English?

Let's try again....


Has Bondi told the world she is just Trump's "wingman"?
 
There’s also illegal campaign donations and accepting about $100,000 in gifts.
Runs in my mind he got in Dutch with the Biden admin over protesting dumping illegals in NYC. Funny how that works, 'eh?
And the 'payback' for no building permit was BS.

How is it hearsay?
Tapes would have been the cats ass.
 
There's so much to choose from in highlighting Bondi's corruption one hardly knows where to begin. Here's something that just happened very recently.

Pam Bondi fires U.S. attorney whom N.J. judges had named to replace Trump ally Alina Habba​

 
Stop pretending as though you actually care.
Well, I know you don't. Unless its some corruption you support.

So far, the DOJ has acted as they have in the past before the left managed to get ahold of them.

With neutrality.
 
15th post
There's so much to choose from in highlighting Bondi's corruption one hardly knows where to begin. Here's something that just happened very recently.

Pam Bondi fires U.S. attorney whom N.J. judges had named to replace Trump ally Alina Habba​

that is not corrupt. Do you even comprehend the definition of the word?

The JUDGE acted corruptly and the EXEC moved to protect their domain.
 
It’s what corrupt leaders do. The people who should be rewarded are those who demonstrate principles. Loyalty to the president isn’t the goal.
principles? you? hahahahahaha ironic
 
Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​


Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.


Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.
She was specifically chosen for her affinity for corruption.
 
Back
Top Bottom