Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

[Marener]

Wow. So, every general in the military, every CEO and manager and supervisor are nothing but corrupt.

Do you even ******* know what leadership is?

Generals swear allegiance to the constitution, not the president. Corporations are not relevant to the conversation.

The January 6th rioters were loyal to Trump and rewarded. I suppose you think that’s how it should be done. Right?

 

[Marener]

His loyalty is to the constitution......and people that support by being loyal to the CIC.

I think there’s plenty of factual basis to doubt his loyalty to the constitution. Trump isn’t really a rule of law kind of guy.

 

[The Duke]

 

[struth]

It’s what corrupt leaders do. The people who should be rewarded are those who demonstrate principles. Loyalty to the president isn’t the goal.

Being loyal to the executive branch of our govt isn’t a good principal?

That explains the last four years when demafasict sold our country off to the CCP

 

[Marener]

Being loyal to the executive branch of our govt isn’t a good principal?

It’s not a good principle when the president tells you to do something corrupt.

 

[berg80]

Its our FBI... you are use to democrat presidents who control the FBI... we don't do that

C'mon man. Kash Patel is so far up trump's ass he knows whether Don had cheese on his Big Mac.

 

[Darkwind]

Generals swear allegiance to the constitution, not the president. Corporations are not relevant to the conversation.

The January 6th rioters were loyal to Trump and rewarded. I suppose you think that’s how it should be done. Right?

Generals lead troops in the belief of something bigger than they are. Managers, supervisors and any truel leader gives stakeholdership to the cause.

That kind of leadership can lead a nation to survive in the face of overwhelming odds.
It can turn an impossible task into a resolve to win.
It can and does give hope.

Jan 6 is just a talking point to you and did not happen as you claim it did.

Leaders get people to focus on a cause. The United States
Leaders get people to stand up to corruption. The FBI and ICE.
Leaders get people to stand for the rule of law. The Attorney General.

It is what leaders do. They give and get the loyalty of those who would help them achieve their goals.

That you don't like it and attack that kind of leadership is just a testiment to just how scare you are.


Mankind would not have survived to 2025 without leaders and people who were loyal to them.

 

[Darkwind]

It’s not a good principle when the president tells you to do something corrupt.

No one has been given an order to do something corrupt.

You not liking something is not corruption. It's just your bias getting in the way.

 

[Marener]

Generals lead troops in the belief of something bigger than they are. Managers, supervisors and any truel leader gives stakeholdership to the cause.

That kind of leadership can lead a nation to survive in the face of overwhelming odds.
It can turn an impossible task into a resolve to win.
It can and does give hope.

Jan 6 is just a talking point to you and did not happen as you claim it did.

Leaders get people to focus on a cause. The United States
Leaders get people to stand up to corruption. The FBI and ICE.
Leaders get people to stand for the rule of law. The Attorney General.

It is what leaders do. They give and get the loyalty of those who would help them achieve their goals.

That you don't like it and attack that kind of leadership is just a testiment to just how scare you are.


Mankind would not have survived to 2025 without leaders and people who were loyal to them.

Leaders can also get people to engage in corruption and defy the constitution in order to accomplish a personal political goal for the purpose of keeping and securing power.

That’s also a type of leadership. Is it not?

When a president asks people to engage in corruption, I hope they remember their loyalties are to the country and not to the president.

 

[struth]

It’s not a good principle when the president tells you to do something corrupt.

Agreed hence why you have a.19 percent appovsl rating

So how do you get out of 19? Stop supporting illegally appointed folks like Jack Smith, stop supporting corruption

 

[Billiejeens]

His loyalty is to the constitution......and people that support by being loyal to the CIC.

"The people who should be rewarded are those who demonstrate principles."



President Trump (in Marener's world) has no principles worth supporting.
Facts to the contrary have no effect.

So - nothing will ever penetrate that automatron.

Wish ya luck though.

 

[berg80]

She was there from 2011 to 2019... By your own graph she did pretty damn good at continuing the downturn.... unlike Garland where crime rocketed up under him and Biden....

COVID impacted crime.

Impact Report: COVID-19 and Crime - Council on Criminal Justice

This updated analysis explores trends in violent, property, and drug offenses during the COVID-19 pandemic through March 2021.

counciloncj.org

 

[Marener]

No one has been given an order to do something corrupt.

When Trump told the DoJ lawyers to just say the election was corrupt in 2020, that was a corrupt order.

 

[Darkwind]

Leaders can also get people to engage in corruption and defy the constitution in order to accomplish a personal political goal for the purpose of keeping and securing power.

That’s also a type of leadership. Is it not?

When a president asks people to engage in corruption, I hope they remember their loyalties are to the country and not to the president.

But enough about the Democratic Party.

So far, Trump is asking his adminsitration to enforce the law.


How corrupt.

 

[Delldude]

I think there’s plenty of factual basis to doubt his loyalty to the constitution. Trump isn’t really a rule of law kind of guy.

It’s not a good principle when the president tells you to do something corrupt.

Any examples?

 

[Darkwind]

When Trump told the DoJ lawyers to just say the election was corrupt in 2020, that was a corrupt order.

He never said it.

This is 2025.

 

[Marener]

He never said it.

This is 2025.

How do you know? Plenty of people were there and there’s testimony saying he did so.

If he did say it, would that be corrupt?

 

[berg80]

Like the rest of the people in the obedient orange orbit (please note the awesome illiteration there), most of her public statements sound like a standard-issue campaign stump speech. It's insulting that they think anyone takes it seriously.

That said, I suspect any doubt will be much more clear when this Epstein/Maxwell thing plays itself out completely.

My guess is that most or all of material released will lean heavily in one partisan direction. But we'll see.

Regardless of the outcome of the Epstein matter Pam has already distinguished herself as perhaps the least independent AG in the country's history. She is at Dotard's beck and call.

 

[Marener]

So far, Trump is asking his adminsitration to enforce the law.

I don’t think he was asking his administration to enforce the law when they dropped the charges on people who were either his political allies or people whom he wanted to do him a favor.

Such as Eric Adams.

 

[Darkwind]

How do you know? Plenty of people were there and there’s testimony saying he did so.

If he did say it, would that be corrupt?

Testimony? LOL

By whom?