Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

[Winco]

I don’t think they are trolling. I think dembots are just that stupid and being trolled by their own party leadership since they can’t produce anything for them

You know that the courts blocked the release, not Biden

Check the history

 

[excalibur]

Trump hires people because he knows he can manipulate them.

They know they are not at risk because he will pardon them

Right, and Democrat Presidents have Cabinets full of people who openly defy them.

I'm off to Bedlam.

 

[excalibur]

Holder and Garland have her beat easily.

Loretta Lynch says: Hi!

 

[Billiejeens]

Dang... where did all the libs run off to?... did they run out of ammo?....

Shooting blanks only works for a short time

 

[Rambunctious]

I don’t think they are trolling. I think dembots are just that stupid and being trolled by their own party leadership since they can’t produce anything for them

Good point...

 

[jknowgood]

Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/05/pam-bondi-orders-grand-jury-probe-of-obama-administration-review-of-2016-election.html

Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.

Independence and Accountability at the Department of Justice

Over the weekend some conservative commentators pushed back on my tweet-claim that President Trump has “threaten[ed] DOJ/FBI over and over in gross violation of independence

www.lawfaremedia.org

Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.

The judges are ignoring the supreme courts decision that they don't have the power to stop the presidents policies? They are the ones that are ignoring the supreme Court.

 

[The Duke]

Loretta Lynch says: Hi!

Elian Gonzalez says

¿Que?​

 

[struth]

Elian Gonzalez says

¿Que?​

Well she wasn’t corrupt as much as just a hard ass that didn’t like brown people in the United States

Lynch met with criminals and helped cover up their crimes

 

[BULLDOG]

It IS what good leaders do.

Not if it is at the expense of the public.

 

[jc456]

Trump hires people because he knows he can manipulate them.

They know they are not at risk because he will pardon them

TDS

 

[jc456]

Both true. The feeling throughout the regime that they are unaccountable to anyone or anything when laws are broken has emboldened them.

how would you even know such shit?

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Pam Bondi sought donation before nixing Trump University ...​

View attachment 1145257
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2016/06/10 › politics › pam-bo...
Jun 10, 2016 — Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi is denying that a $25000 donation from Donald Trump is in any way connected to her office's decision not
to pursue action against Trump University, despite dozens of complaints in Florida, her spokesman said.

Bondi, who endorsed Trump in March, received the donation in 2013 via a political action committee raising money for her re-election.

She lies just as much as Trump.

You’ll be madder when the deep staters go to jail.

 

[jc456]

No. And the only ones speculating on that conversation are butthurt libtard losers.

here's a video i ran across at lunch today. This is the best view for what a demofk actually is.



all this guy does is talk, talk, talk, talk, filibustering the entire set. hey fkwad shut the fk up for five fking seconds and take a mthr fking breath.

 

[struth]

Not if it is at the expense of the public.

You have a 19 percent approval rating, you aren’t the public, you are a fridge group akin to Hamas

 

[Darkwind]

Not if it is at the expense of the public.

For the good of the public.

It's like you clowns have never taken any leadership classes at all.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not if it is at the expense of the public.

Good that it is not, then.

 

[Marener]

It IS what good leaders do.

It’s what corrupt leaders do. The people who should be rewarded are those who demonstrate principles. Loyalty to the president isn’t the goal.

 

[The Duke]

 

[Darkwind]

It’s what corrupt leaders do. The people who should be rewarded are those who demonstrate principles. Loyalty to the president isn’t the goal.

Wow. So, every general in the military, every CEO and manager and supervisor are nothing but corrupt.


Do you even ******* know what leadership is?

 

[Delldude]

Loyalty to the president isn’t the goal.

His loyalty is to the constitution......and people that support by being loyal to the CIC.