Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

That's the best you can do? LOL
It’s better than you’re claim that Biden could instruct the DoJ to open an investigation they had already opened 6 months earlier.
 
It’s better than you’re claim that Biden could instruct the DoJ to open an investigation they had already opened 6 months earlier.
LOL You're the one that put the vegetable in the WH. Stop whining at me because the Zucchini said out loud the private instructions he gave Garland
 
LOL You're the one that put the vegetable in the WH. Stop whining at me because the Zucchini said out loud the private instructions he gave Garland
How did you learn he gave private instructions to Garland?
 
How did you learn he gave private instructions to Garland?
I was there. I heard it. LOL He confirmed it to the entire world, you heard it. Cracks me up that you are still defending the Eggplant even after he fucked your party but good. But hey, I guess you have to do you. LOL
 
How did you learn he gave private instructions to Garland?
Because he stated publicly, as link above, his plan

Frankly he was lying when he stated it publicly, since we know he used illegal means to try and lock up his political rival
 
Taking the first place slot from the likes of John Mitchell, Ed Meese, Mitchell Palmer, and Bill Barr is no easy task. But Pam has sprinted out of the gate. She has presided over the DoJ's weaponization, turned a blind eye to the regime's refusal to comply with court orders, put an end to the anti-corruption task force, given contradictory statements about the Epstein file, tacitly approved violations of constitutional rights possessed by illegally deported immigrants, and now this.

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election​


Especially since Watergate, it has been vital that the DoJ maintain its independence from the executive branch of government. trump has violated that independence.

For those who believe in a unitary executive, DOJ/FBI independence is a constitutional solecism. On this view, Article II vests the “executive power” in the President alone, and he alone wields it. That means that the President can do what he likes with his Executive branch subordinates—hire them, fire them, ignore them, order them to act in certain ways, and the like. The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.


Pam has become the enabler of a would be autocrat, which is just what she was chosen for. By both acquiescence and proactive measures she has shown herself to be as incompetent as she is co-opted. She's making Bill Barr's hideous "exonerated" lie look like child's play. And her term has only just begun.
Keep in mind since Democrats do not want to mention this fact.
Eric Holder { like skipped a couple grades growing up } he was
so smart.
HOWEVER ... He went on and became { all his own doing }
to become The Only active Cabinet Member In U.S. history to be charged and
found guilty of CONTEMP.
Never spent an hour behind bars.
 
You were in the private meeting with Biden and Garland where he instructed him to go after Trump.

Sure dude. Sure you were.
Why do we have to be in a private meeting with them when Joe came out and told us what he did?
 
Keep in mind since Democrats do not want to mention this fact.
Eric Holder { like skipped a couple grades growing up } he was
so smart.
HOWEVER ... He went on and became { all his own doing }
to become The Only active Cabinet Member In U.S. history to be charged and
found guilty of CONTEMP.
Never spent an hour behind bars.

Holder is a black Democrat.

Doubly indemnified
 
You were in the private meeting with Biden and Garland where he instructed him to go after Trump.

Sure dude. Sure you were.
More credible than the excuses for the Zucchini that you are making up.
 
More credible than the excuses for the Zucchini that you are making up.
Just so we are clear, you think you were in private meetings between Biden and Garland.

Wow.
 
Keep in mind since Democrats do not want to mention this fact.
Eric Holder { like skipped a couple grades growing up } he was
so smart.
HOWEVER ... He went on and became { all his own doing }
to become The Only active Cabinet Member In U.S. history to be charged and
found guilty of CONTEMP.
Never spent an hour behind bars.
He was never convicted, he didn’t prosecute himself
 
15th post
She covers up for pedos, just like all the other ones we had before.
 
It’s sick you think it’s ok to abuse a sex slave
Getting a neck rub from a consenting adult is abuse?

I guess you gotta say something troll
 
Back
Top Bottom