The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?
No, the Constitution prevents trials because no treason has occurred by the definition contained in the document itself.
If ever there were a treason trial, the Constitution certainly does not forbid broadcasting it.
Talking about a treason trial is not necessarily talking about the current occupant of the White House. It was clearly a comment about a category of news, not a comment about a news event. It must be admitted that, were there irrefutable proof of treason on the part of the present POTUS, it would immeasurably ironic and funny on a cosmic level.
Listen up dumbass! Go read the Constitution. You can't have a trial for treason because we are not at war. Go back and read it again, or find some middle school-age child to read it for you.
For someone with such a ridiculous avatar, you certainly have a lot of gall calling other people names.
There is no Constitutional exclusion of Congress impeaching a President for what Congress would deem impeachable.
example from Wikipedia:
"Impeachable offenses
The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".
[32] Several commentators have suggested that
Congress alone may decide for itself what constitutes a "high crime or misdemeanor", especially since
Nixon v. United States stated that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to determine whether the Senate properly "tried" a defendant.
[33] In 1970, then-
House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.""
Maintaining that treason would have to involve another nation in "open hostilities" does not at all infer that the U.S. would have to be in a Obsessionally declared state of war, does it?
An act that is tantamount to treason would qualify as a high crime, and be impeachable, n'est pas?
No further communication with you, "deafposterior".