Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,206
- 3,630
- 290
You are arguing that Israel should not support Arab Palestinian self-determination and sovereignty in a two state solution. You are arguing that Israel apply its sovereignty over the entire territory.We agree that the native population cannot defeat the ethnocracy militarily and judging by your post we should also agree that Israel is a racial dictatorship because what you described below is the fundamental trait of all supremacist states:
Israel's powerful military has prevented that from happening
A state that keeps the native population confined in ethnic enclaves or small areas under the threat of death in order to create an artificial racial or ethnic majority in the rest of the territory fits the definition of an ethnocracy to a T.
Your words describe a quintessential, textbook example of a supremacist state but for some unknown reason you insist on calling this racial dictatorship a "liberal democracy".
Is that what you intend to argue?