Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,621
- 58,589
- 3,565
7 european trained arab armies defeated by an ad hoc rag rag Jewish defense forceThere's the old persecution complex and hysterical paranoia again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
7 european trained arab armies defeated by an ad hoc rag rag Jewish defense forceThere's the old persecution complex and hysterical paranoia again.
The German military said it was.Fighting the German military isn't a terrorist act.
The conflict (civil war) began right after the UN passed the partition plan resolution, the Arabs said they would resist an imposed colonial state on Arab land and that's what they did once the partition plan was passed.7 european trained arab armies defeated by an ad hoc rag rag Jewish defense force
President Truman later noted, "The facts were that not only were there pressure movements around the United Nations unlike anything that had been seen there before, but that the White House, too, was subjected to a constant barrage. I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders—actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats—disturbed and annoyed me."[102]
The Mandate allocated territory to the Jewish people (Israel) and to the Arab people (Jordan).God, you are so full of shit!
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine allocated 56.47% of the Mandate's territory to the Jewish state, or 15,264 square kilometers. The remaining territory was to be divided, with 42.88% allocated to an Arab state...
It did no such thing, I corrected your misunderstanding of the Mandate for Palestine recently, must I do so again?The Mandate allocated territory to the Jewish people (Israel) and to the Arab people (Jordan).
If you meant to say the UNGA recommended a Partition Plan, than say so. Accuracy matters.
The sheer arrogance of "Arab land".The conflict (civil war) began right after the UN passed the partition plan resolution, the Arabs said they would resist an imposed colonial state on Arab land and that's what they did once the partition plan was passed.
It did no such thing, I corrected your misunderstanding of the mandate recently, must I do so again?
...which outlines the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land and confirms the right to RE-ESTABLISH its national home in that country. Thanks for posting.It did no such thing, I corrected your misunderstanding of the Mandate for Palestine recently, must I do so again?
For those interested in seeing Shusha's erroneous reading, here is the full unabridged and unedited text of the 1922 Mandate for Palestine.
No it is not a lie! You forced 750,000 Arab farmers off their land with the use of Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun.Thats a lie
The arabs invaded with the expectation of driving all the Jews into the sea
But God had other ideas
The sheer arrogance of "Arab land".
Please show us all where in the text of the Mandate you read "the Mandate allocated territory to the Jewish people"?...which outlines the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land and confirms the right to RE-ESTABLISH its national home in that country. Thanks for posting.
Because the Arabs conquered and colonized the Jewish homeland.It was predominantly occupied predominantly by Arabs for thousands of years...
No, this is proof of return and re-establishing the Jewish national home in the Jewish land. It is decolonization.This is proof of colonization, rapid and dramatic demographic changes as a result of colonial interference (Britain).
Well, the term "allocation" is not the most accurate. That term was brought up by Billo. It was a recognition of inherent rights. But its all there in the Preamble.Please show us all where in the text of the Mandate you read "the Mandate allocated territory to the Jewish people"?
Take your time...
Dead people cannot "return" to anywhere and people who never lived there cannot be said to "return" there, there's a much more accurate way to describe this and it's "foreign colonization" not "return" which is a sheer absurdity and abuse of English.Because the Arabs conquered and colonized the Jewish homeland.
No, this is proof of return and re-establishing the Jewish national home in the Jewish land. It is decolonization.
No it isn't.Well, the term "allocation" is not the most accurate. That term was brought up by Billo. It was a recognition of inherent rights.
But its all there in the Preamble.
No it is not a lie! You forced 750,000 Arab farmers off their land with the use of Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun.
arabs were on jewish land and no supposed to be.Because the Arabs conquered and colonized the Jewish homeland.
No, this is proof of return and re-establishing the Jewish national home in the Jewish land. It is decolonization.
People returning to their own homeland can not be colonizers. This isn't difficult to understand. Or do you intend to utterly destroy the entire concept of Palestinian return with your own argument?Dead people cannot "return" to anywhere and people who never lived there cannot be said to "return" there, there's a much more accurate way to describe this and it's "foreign colonization" not "return" which is a sheer absurdity and abuse of English.
I have no idea what you are reading. But the Preamble is clear about the re-establishment of the Jewish national home in Mandatory Palestine.No it isn't.
How can one return to a place they've never been to?People returning to their own homeland can not be colonizers.
What is this "Palestinian return" you speak of? when did that take place?This isn't difficult to understand. Or do you intend to utterly destroy the entire concept of Palestinian return with your own argument?
Here's the "preamble" if I understand what you mean by that:I have no idea what you are reading. But the Preamble is clear about the re-establishment of the Jewish national home in Mandatory Palestine.
The Council of the League of Nations: Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country; and Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; and Whereas the mandate in respect of Palestine has been formulated in the following terms and submitted to the Council of the League for approval; and Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions; and Whereas by the aforementioned Article 22 (paragraph 8), it is provided that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League, shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League of Nations;