Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

[Bleipriester]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

So when a Hamas member launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians?
And when Israel launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians, as well?

 

[Bleipriester]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

 

[P F Tinmore]

EXCLUSIVE: Blair met Khaled Meshaal to negotiate end of Gaza siege

Tony Blair met Khaled Meshaal, the leader of Hamas, twice in Doha to negotiate a plan to end the eight-year-long siege of Gaza, Middle East Eye has learned.

Blair met Meshaal before his resignation as Middle East envoy for the Quartet in May, but dialogue with him and his officials is still continuing, MEE understands.

Blair, accompanied by other former British officials, discussed how to end the siege of Gaza. The core issues are a ceasefire, which could be a rolling one, in exchange for Gaza securing a sea port and possibly an airport. The terms of the ceasefire, and its duration, as well as other details of the agreement are yet to be specified.

Blair is one of a number of UN and European envoys to visit Gaza in the last six months. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Mohammed al-Emadi, president of the Qatari National Committee for the Reconstruction of Gaza, Paul Garnier, the Swiss ambassador to the Palestinian Authority, and Frank-Walter Steinmeyer, the German foreign minister, have all recently made the same trip. Steinmeyer called Gaza a “powder keg” that is at risk of exploding.

But the Doha dialogue between Blair and Meshaal is regarded as the most serious and sustained to take place with the Palestinian group so far. MEE understands that Blair is talking with the support of British Prime Minister David Cameron, Washington, the EU and with the knowledge of the Israelis, and two Arab states.

- See more at: EXCLUSIVE: Blair met Khaled Meshaal to negotiate end of Gaza siege

And once again you post islamonazi propaganda as the recent reports of hamas firing illegal rockets at Israel have shown. It shows that hamas does not want peace, just the genocide of the Jews and the destruction of Israel.

Pfffft, Israeli talking points.

 

[Bleipriester]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

rip..............

the sound of the 8 yr truce agreement being torn up

The shit of Al-Qaeda.

 

[Slyhunter]

Either become willing to allow Israel their country and leave them alone or die

 

[Lipush]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

For you, anything less than killing all Israeli Jews will qualify as "nothing"

What do they get?? Nothing.

How bout not getting their explosive collective butts more explosive yet by IDF planes?

 

[Daniyel]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

 

[Bleipriester]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

Interesting view with a lot of sense in that.
But there has to be a solution some day. How should it look like?

 

[Daniyel]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

Interesting view with a lot of sense in that.
But there has to be a solution some day. How should it look like?

Definitely without Hamas, Fatah place is questionable.
There has to be a leader to replace those more likely to rebel Hamas in Gaza first.

 

[Bleipriester]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

Interesting view with a lot of sense in that.
But there has to be a solution some day. How should it look like?

Definitely without Hamas, Fatah place is questionable.
There has to be a leader to replace those more likely to rebel Hamas in Gaza first.

There are surely still some secular movements that could be worth considering.

 

[Phoenall]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

So when a Hamas member launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians?
And when Israel launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians, as well?

Where did I post that then


The UN and AI have both stated that qassams are illegal weapons and a war crime on two counts.

The Israeli's took out a valid military target with minimal casualties as in accordance with IHL

IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU herr obergefrieter

 

[Phoenall]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

No as it is one sided in hamas favour. Make it a proper two sided treaty that ensures Israeli childrens safety and you might get agreement.

 

[Phoenall]

EXCLUSIVE: Blair met Khaled Meshaal to negotiate end of Gaza siege

Tony Blair met Khaled Meshaal, the leader of Hamas, twice in Doha to negotiate a plan to end the eight-year-long siege of Gaza, Middle East Eye has learned.

Blair met Meshaal before his resignation as Middle East envoy for the Quartet in May, but dialogue with him and his officials is still continuing, MEE understands.

Blair, accompanied by other former British officials, discussed how to end the siege of Gaza. The core issues are a ceasefire, which could be a rolling one, in exchange for Gaza securing a sea port and possibly an airport. The terms of the ceasefire, and its duration, as well as other details of the agreement are yet to be specified.

Blair is one of a number of UN and European envoys to visit Gaza in the last six months. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Mohammed al-Emadi, president of the Qatari National Committee for the Reconstruction of Gaza, Paul Garnier, the Swiss ambassador to the Palestinian Authority, and Frank-Walter Steinmeyer, the German foreign minister, have all recently made the same trip. Steinmeyer called Gaza a “powder keg” that is at risk of exploding.

But the Doha dialogue between Blair and Meshaal is regarded as the most serious and sustained to take place with the Palestinian group so far. MEE understands that Blair is talking with the support of British Prime Minister David Cameron, Washington, the EU and with the knowledge of the Israelis, and two Arab states.

- See more at: EXCLUSIVE: Blair met Khaled Meshaal to negotiate end of Gaza siege

And once again you post islamonazi propaganda as the recent reports of hamas firing illegal rockets at Israel have shown. It shows that hamas does not want peace, just the genocide of the Jews and the destruction of Israel.

Pfffft, Israeli talking points.

No as it was A.I. and the UN that stated the qassams are illegal weapons and a war crime. Then the Palestinians have shown by their recent spouting of the hamas charter that they do not want peace, just the genocide of the Jews and the destruction of Israel.

 

[Phoenall]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

rip..............

the sound of the 8 yr truce agreement being torn up

The shit of Al-Qaeda.

All extremist/fundamentalist Islamic groups are the same they don't want progression in islam, they just want the version of islam around in the 7C and all of its attendant violence and fascism. So the likes of Al Qaeda outnumber the rest of islam about 1 million to 1

 

[Phoenall]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

Interesting view with a lot of sense in that.
But there has to be a solution some day. How should it look like?

No hamas or fatah and a deal brokered that gives all sides a fair crack of the whip. Mutual borders and mutual partnerships in natural resources, an end to the violence and terrorism and free access to the dome of the rock by the Jews and Christians. An admission that the Al Aqsa mosque is not a holy place would help as well

 

[Phoenall]

There is no deal and no negotiations according to Israel's officials, however Hamas assume if they might offer some deal to Israel with Egypt's assistance that might be considered in Israel..the funny fact is that IS just captured 50 Hamas members on their way to Cairo so I guess it's despair fueling Hamas now.

Would you support such a deal?

Something similar was offered to the Palestinians in the past yet again they've missed the train, I personally won't support such deal at this point for two and a half reasons.
1.Those typical time outs are nothing but an attempt to reload the new magazines Hamas spent last summer while gaining more support for the next round.(You may also conclude that I have zero faith in Hamas deals)
They claimed they won't stop until the blockade is entirely lifted, but the fact they are counting their last rockets prove the success of the blockade and it's crucial necessarity..along with the new Iranian missiles I think this is another media spin to raise the support inside Gaza that is fading anyway.
2.Second reason is by allowing the losing side to determine anything including terms of surrendering is a vital mistake, they've claimed victorious last summer and yet they are in a position to suggest a deceiving deal such as that to Israel is an insult itself not to mention a new reason for Hamas to come up with a better idea for the right to deserve negotiations in the next time they'll assault Israel.

Interesting view with a lot of sense in that.
But there has to be a solution some day. How should it look like?

Definitely without Hamas, Fatah place is questionable.
There has to be a leader to replace those more likely to rebel Hamas in Gaza first.

There are surely still some secular movements that could be worth considering.

Not Yet until we rid the world of extremist islam

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

Hamas without tunnels? lol.

What is your problem, how about Israel without an Air Force, Sirens, Shelters, IDF, Nukes, Iron Dome, and you begrudge them a few tunnels. They can't go up or to sea , you have them trapped. What do you actually think these people are suppose to bow down to you, because of what, your all powerful and you think for some absurb reason you have some sort of right to that land, their land , your stealing their land and killing them. Just who do you think you are?

Then let them build the tunnels under your schools and prime them with H.E. ready to blow the schools up. If they did that then the UN would need to very quickly evacuate gaza before every living thing was killed in the backlash.
These people need to start accepting that they are not superior to the rest of the world and start acting as decent human beings, and not gods chosen. They made promises 2 years ago and have since ignored them, so time for the UN to issue threats in regards to those promises and give them 6 weeks to negotiate peace and mutual borders or get removed from the UN and lose the UNWRA

Then let them build the tunnels under your schools and prime them with H.E. ready to blow the schools up.​

I hear that BS all the time but 100% of their attacks were legitimate targets. Only the invading IDF troops were attacked. No civilians.

 

[Hollie]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

Hamas without tunnels? lol.

What is your problem, how about Israel without an Air Force, Sirens, Shelters, IDF, Nukes, Iron Dome, and you begrudge them a few tunnels. They can't go up or to sea , you have them trapped. What do you actually think these people are suppose to bow down to you, because of what, your all powerful and you think for some absurb reason you have some sort of right to that land, their land , your stealing their land and killing them. Just who do you think you are?

Then let them build the tunnels under your schools and prime them with H.E. ready to blow the schools up. If they did that then the UN would need to very quickly evacuate gaza before every living thing was killed in the backlash.
These people need to start accepting that they are not superior to the rest of the world and start acting as decent human beings, and not gods chosen. They made promises 2 years ago and have since ignored them, so time for the UN to issue threats in regards to those promises and give them 6 weeks to negotiate peace and mutual borders or get removed from the UN and lose the UNWRA

Then let them build the tunnels under your schools and prime them with H.E. ready to blow the schools up.​

I hear that BS all the time but 100% of their attacks were legitimate targets. Only the invading IDF troops were attacked. No civilians.

No kidding? So the Hamas action of indiscriminate acts of war against Israel are legitimate?

"Palestinian Mentality" at its worst.

 

[Bleipriester]

Hamas-Israel Deal: Who Benefits?

According to multiple news sources, including Haaretz andJPost, Hamas and Israel are currently in the process of solidifying a deal that would end the closure (also known as the blockade) in exchange for an eight-year cease-fire, return of prisoners and halt to tunnel building. On the surface, this deal seems favorable for both sides. Gaza would be able to start much needed reconstruction and rebuild its economy, while Israel would gain regional quiet for the near future. However, reality is more complicated than it often seems.

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

So when a Hamas member launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians?
And when Israel launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians, as well?

Where did I post that then


The UN and AI have both stated that qassams are illegal weapons and a war crime on two counts.

The Israeli's took out a valid military target with minimal casualties as in accordance with IHL

IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU herr obergefrieter

It is clear that for you, only Palestinians are guilty.
And you are screaming about Palestinian rockets, while Israel uses weapons that are illegal and murderous.

...with minimal casualties as in accordance with IHL...

"The Israeli military is reportedly using flechette shells in its offensive in Gaza, weapons described as illegal under “rules of humanitarian law” by an Israeli human rights organisation.

Generally fired by a tank and described as an “imprecise weapon” ill-suited to combat in a built-up area, flechette shells explode in the air above a target, sending out a cone of thousands of tiny steel darts each no more than 4cm (1.57 ins) long."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...g-flechette-rounds-in-gaza-strip-9617480.html


"Israeli and international human rights organizations accused Israel of using white phosphorus munitions improperly during Israel’s three-week military offensive against Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza in the winter of 2008-9. Such munitions are not prohibited under international law, but they are not supposed to be used in civilian areas, because white phosphorus is highly flammable and, like napalm, it can burn flesh. Israel maintained that its use of shells containing phosphorus did not violate international law.

Kershner also didn’t mention that Israel initially denied its use of white phosphorus, which would be an behavior had its use of the munitions been legal. The London Times reported on January 5, 2009 that despite Israel’s denials, “the tell-tale shells could be seen spreading tentacles of thick white smoke to cover the troops’ advance.”"
Israel’s Illegal Use of White Phosphorus During ‘Operation Cast Lead’ | Foreign Policy Journal


"Testimony given to Al-Monitor by Palestinian nurses, doctors and human rights activists indicate that the Israeli army used DIMEs, which causes the loss of limbs and leads to wounds that do not respond to treatment.

DIME weapons "kill their victims through the amputation of limbs in a way that resembles an automated saw. As for those who are able to survive, they are vulnerable to cancer because [the weapons] contain carcinogenic tungsten," reads a July 21 report by Al Jazeera."
Israel accused of using illegal weapons in Gaza war - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East

 

[Hollie]

No I don't think so, all the people need freedom of movement, and the Palestinians in Gaza should be able to move freely back and forth to the west bank and vice versa.

What is the Palestinians in Gaza getting in this deal, nothing.

Peace and no more retaliation to illegal rockets. But latest news is that hamas have started to fire illegal rockets again and Israel has responded by targeting senior hamas officials.
So you see it is a two way street and unless the Palestinians start acting like decent human beings they will be treated as scum.

So when a Hamas member launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians?
And when Israel launches a rocket, it is the Palestinians, as well?

Where did I post that then


The UN and AI have both stated that qassams are illegal weapons and a war crime on two counts.

The Israeli's took out a valid military target with minimal casualties as in accordance with IHL

IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU herr obergefrieter

It is clear that for you, only Palestinians are guilty.
And you are screaming about Palestinian rockets, while Israel uses weapons that are illegal and murderous.

...with minimal casualties as in accordance with IHL...

"The Israeli military is reportedly using flechette shells in its offensive in Gaza, weapons described as illegal under “rules of humanitarian law” by an Israeli human rights organisation.

Generally fired by a tank and described as an “imprecise weapon” ill-suited to combat in a built-up area, flechette shells explode in the air above a target, sending out a cone of thousands of tiny steel darts each no more than 4cm (1.57 ins) long."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...g-flechette-rounds-in-gaza-strip-9617480.html


"Israeli and international human rights organizations accused Israel of using white phosphorus munitions improperly during Israel’s three-week military offensive against Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza in the winter of 2008-9. Such munitions are not prohibited under international law, but they are not supposed to be used in civilian areas, because white phosphorus is highly flammable and, like napalm, it can burn flesh. Israel maintained that its use of shells containing phosphorus did not violate international law.

Kershner also didn’t mention that Israel initially denied its use of white phosphorus, which would be an behavior had its use of the munitions been legal. The London Times reported on January 5, 2009 that despite Israel’s denials, “the tell-tale shells could be seen spreading tentacles of thick white smoke to cover the troops’ advance.”"
Israel’s Illegal Use of White Phosphorus During ‘Operation Cast Lead’ | Foreign Policy Journal


"Testimony given to Al-Monitor by Palestinian nurses, doctors and human rights activists indicate that the Israeli army used DIMEs, which causes the loss of limbs and leads to wounds that do not respond to treatment.

DIME weapons "kill their victims through the amputation of limbs in a way that resembles an automated saw. As for those who are able to survive, they are vulnerable to cancer because [the weapons] contain carcinogenic tungsten," reads a July 21 report by Al Jazeera."
Israel accused of using illegal weapons in Gaza war - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East

Wow. So you're suggesting that Islamic terrorists must be treated with care and consideration so we don't offend their tender islamo-sensibilities?