Hacked Climate Emails Called a "Smear Campaign"

[Political Junky]

goody goody and we have a couple of scientists above who know exactly what was being said in the hacked e-mails! - perhaps prof. Jeny can break the e-mails down for us in the general public and explain their meaning?

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

Yes, cons are good at doing that, at least enough to fool other cons.

 

[The T]

goody goody and we have a couple of scientists above who know exactly what was being said in the hacked e-mails! - perhaps prof. Jeny can break the e-mails down for us in the general public and explain their meaning?

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

Yes, cons are good at doing that, at least enough to fool other cons.

The letters speak for themselves. Careful about the use of 'CON"...for me your use of it rings hallow, and frankly moronic.

 

[Political Junky]

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

Yes, cons are good at doing that, at least enough to fool other cons.

The letters speak for themselves. Careful about the use of 'CON"...for me your use of it rings hallow, and frankly moronic.

Rings "hallow"? God, Cons are dumb.

 

[Oddball]

Remind me to crucify the **** out of you for your next typo, shitheel.

 

[The T]

Remind me to crucify the **** out of you for your next typo, shitheel.

It's OK. Let this shallow **** have his fun.

 

[Big Fitz]

McCain and Obama Supporters Largely Agree on Approaches to Energy, Climate Change - World Public Opinion=

McCain and Obama Supporters Largely Agree on Approaches to Energy, Climate Change

I am going to bet that these wing-nuts turn on their own.....

Oboy! Polls based on theoretical unknowns with no specifics mentioned! Those are always SOOOOOO accurate!

Please explain to me then when ever a health care poll involves costs beyond "free" or something undefined, less than 30% of the public support it at ALL age ranges polled?

Think these same trends would come about in this discussion?

 

[chanel]

Many people will agree with something that seems unrefuted. Too bad they didn't have all the data. This is a major clusterfuck (I've always wanted to use that word)

 

[Polk]

goody goody and we have a couple of scientists above who know exactly what was being said in the hacked e-mails! - perhaps prof. Jeny can break the e-mails down for us in the general public and explain their meaning?

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

Because clearly, you know so much more sitting there pounding away at your keyboard than people who have spend their life studying these subjects.

 

[Polk]

goody goody and we have a couple of scientists above who know exactly what was being said in the hacked e-mails! - perhaps prof. Jeny can break the e-mails down for us in the general public and explain their meaning?

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

And especially when these same scientists are lamenting that the trend has been toward cooling in the past 10 years. Their nonsense has been outed for the scam that it is.

We have to expect the lashing out from them. It's their only recourse except for admitting the fraud. (But I don't see that happening).

There hasn't been a trend toward cooling in the last ten years. You can keep claiming that all you want, but that doesn't make it true.

 

[The T]

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

And especially when these same scientists are lamenting that the trend has been toward cooling in the past 10 years. Their nonsense has been outed for the scam that it is.

We have to expect the lashing out from them. It's their only recourse except for admitting the fraud. (But I don't see that happening).

There hasn't been a trend toward cooling in the last ten years. You can keep claiming that all you want, but that doesn't make it true.

YOU Are an insignifigant dweeb. YOU can PRETEND all you like. The Hockey-Stick is a LIE...perpetrated by shitheads like YOU...

And to Reinterate?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1755566-post1.html

Here is the actual temperature graph that INCLUDES the data that utilized the Mann "trick" to "hide the decline" as noted in the now infamous whistleblower climate emails.

This thing is really starting to catch on now folks - I was disheartened by the media foot dragging, but the momentum is now initiating a decided shift in favor of truth, and against this global warming scame.

And now for the chart - rather incredible...

And here is the original Mann chart, with the utilized "trick", which was then regurgitated over and over again by the other climate "studies" articles (peer reviewed of course) government agencies, the media, etc...

Anyone attempting to argue there was not widespread collusion among the global warmers to control the data and mislead the public, is practicing the same dishonesty as did Mann and his global warming ilk.

Legal charges are forthcoming...


McIntyre: The deleted data from the “Hide the Decline” trick « Watts Up With That?

 

[saveliberty]

It's pretty obvious that the earth is warming.

Melting glaciers, melting ice caps, and rising ocean temperatures don't lie.

I love the stupidity of the right, however. Are they ever right about anything?

• El Niño Contributed Largely to Rise in Temperatures• Average Temperatures Rose to 16.9c

"The unusually warm summer temperatures for much of the world's oceans were due to El Niño, the periodic warming of the Pacific. If El Niño strengthens, global temperatures are likely to set new records, the report said. So far, 2009 has been the fifth warmest year on record."

What cause El Nino then?:

"In an El Niño, the winds pushing that water around get weaker. As a result, some of the warm water piled up in the west slumps back down to the east, and not as much cold water gets pulled up from below. Both these tend to make the water in the eastern Pacific warmer, which is one of the hallmarks of an El Niño.

But it doesn't stop there. The warmer ocean then affects the winds--it makes the winds weaker! So if the winds get weaker, then the ocean gets warmer, which makes the winds get weaker, which makes the ocean get warmer ... this is called a positive feedback, and is what makes an El Niño grow."

So I ask you, does carbon emissions effect wind?

Wind - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Globally, the two major driving factors of large scale winds (the atmospheric circulation) are the differential heating between the equator and the poles (difference in absorption of solar energy leading to buoyancy forces) and the rotation of the planet."

I am going to go out on a limb and say the Earth is not accelerating due to carbon emissions. That leaves atomspheric circulation. That is driven by the difference between the heating of the equator and the poles. If the poles are getting warmer, then the difference should be less, meaning less wind. In any case carbon emissions don't effect wind which is the driving force behind El Nino, which in turn makes the ocean warmer.

 

[Polk]

Because, clearly, we should all take the word of random bloggers?

 

[Big Fitz]

Many people will agree with something that seems unrefuted. Too bad they didn't have all the data. This is a major clusterfuck (I've always wanted to use that word)

Charlie Foxtrot. Large and in charge.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

The Global Warming fanatics have tried to end all debate on the issue. These kooks waved bye bye to logic & reason a long time ago. Now it's time for them to usher in their Global Warming Gestapos. It's all about Socialism and Government control in the end. Just look at who the people are who are behind all this hysterical Fear Mongering. More studies need to be done on Climate because the case is definitely not closed. People should have known it was a scam when the guy who claimed he created the Internet got behind it.

 

[The T]

The Global Warming fanatics have tried to end all debate on the issue. These kooks waved bye bye to logic & reason a long time ago. Now it's time for them to usher in their Global Warming Gestapos. It's all about Socialism and Government control in the end. Just look at who the people are who are behind all this hysterical Fear Mongering. More studies need to be done on Climate because the case is definitely not closed. People should have known it was a scam when the guy who claimed he created the Internet got behind it.

Yep. His last claim to fame is turning into one of infamy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow! The ManMade Global Warming Fanatics are totally out of their ******* minds! They make Islamic Jihadists look rational

Algore Akbaraaaaaa!

Insane!

 

[The T]

Wow! The ManMade Global Warming Fanatics are totally out of their ******* minds! They make Islamic Jihadists look rational

Algore Akbaraaaaaa!

Insane!

Shout it from the Glaciers! LOL!

 

[asaratis]

Yeah, the MMGW Scientists are in good company: Enron, Global Crossing and Bernie Madoff

...and Albert "Shyster", winner of Nobel Prize for Piece'o'work!

goody goody and we have a couple of scientists above who know exactly what was being said in the hacked e-mails! - perhaps prof. Jeny can break the e-mails down for us in the general public and explain their meaning?

I recognise bad science when I see it.

THIS is bad science.

Data can be cooked to make sure ANY outcome is assured--especially by talented scientists who know how to cook the data to make the outcome seem real.

Because clearly, you know so much more sitting there pounding away at your keyboard than people who have spend their life studying these subjects.

...and while you're poundin' your puddin', heretofore trusted "scientists" are being exposed as liars, manipulators and rapists of their very vocation...unworthy of ANY government funding or any consideration regarding their retaining their positions.

Because, clearly, we should all take the word of random bloggers?

The word is out, sucker. Bloggers, news commentators, barbers, lawyers, judges, congressmen, truck drivers, housewives and attentive students are talkin' about it. How many examples of lying do you have to see before you'll admit that the "scientific" data that supports the global warming movement is bogus? Al Gore is impersonating an honorable man.

 

[keee keee]

the only thing full of more bullshit than this global warming scam is the OBAMA administration!!!!!

 

[keee keee]

ALGORE AKBAR!!!! la la la la la down with global warming and Obama too!!!!! ALL BULLSHIT ALL OF THE TIME!!!!!