Guy McPherson in 2016 - "I Can't Imagine There Will be a Human on the Planet in Ten Years"

Hell, want a real laugh? Try reading some of the predictions from the time of the first Earth Day in 1970.

Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 issue of Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”

“Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”

Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.

Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”

Ecologist Kenneth Watt told Time that, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Barry Commoner predicted that decaying organic pollutants would use up all of the oxygen in America’s rivers, causing freshwater fish to suffocate.

Paul Ehrlich chimed in, predicting in 1970 that “air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” Ehrlich sketched a scenario in which 200,000 Americans would die in 1973 during “smog disasters” in New York and Los Angeles.

Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared, “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”

Harrison Brown, a scientist at the National Academy of Sciences, published a chart in Scientific American that looked at metal reserves and estimated the humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990.

Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look that, “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”

Kenneth Watt warned about a pending Ice Age in a speech. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”

Now Ken Watt is interesting, as he was one of the biggest propagandists of the "New Ice Age" in the 1970s. Of course, in the late 1980s he then flipped to being one of the biggest propagandists of "Global Warming".

This is the biggest problem with all of these Doomsayers. Eventually the march of time catches up to them, and it is proven that their claims are just moonbeams and unicorn farts. And the most amazing thing is that they seem completely incapable of ever admitting they were wrong. They simply make more doomist predictions another 10-20 years in the future..
 
Oh, and do not take my word for it. Paul Ehlich's essay "Eco-Catastrophe!" is available for all to read.


In 1969 Dr. Ehlich wrote a book that was quite a sensation called "The Population Bomb". He even appeared on "The Tonight Show" to talk about it.



And over five decades later, he still claims he was right. That is fascinating to watch, as there is another guest on the show that systematically tears down every argument he makes, and he still doubles down and claims he is right. Meanwhile, we know the reality and that none of his predictions came true.
 
EMH is hacking again.

Does Dr. James Hansen have a good climate science reputation?

Short answer: Yes — James Hansen is widely regarded as one of the most influential and respected climate scientists in the world, though he is also known for being unusually outspoken, which draws both admiration and criticism. His scientific reputation within climate research remains strong and well‑established.


🧭 What his reputation rests on​

1. Foundational scientific contributions

  • Former director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (1967–2013).
  • Pioneered modern climate modeling, radiative transfer, and planetary atmospheres.
  • His 1988 testimony to Congress is widely credited with bringing global warming into public consciousness.
These contributions are considered bedrock in climate science.

2. Active, ongoing research

Recent peer‑reviewed work (2023–2025) continues to appear in major journals, including Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development and Oxford Open Climate Change, indicating that he remains scientifically active and taken seriously in the research community.

3. Leadership in current climate debates

Hansen continues to lead research teams documenting accelerating global warming, including a 2025 study showing a >50% increase in warming rate since 2010. This work has been widely covered in climate science reporting and discussed by other researchers.

4. Public-facing advocacy

He is known for strong, sometimes blunt public statements:

  • Arguing that the 1.5°C target is no longer achievable.
  • Warning about rapid sea-level rise and ice-sheet instability.
  • Advocating for nuclear power as part of decarbonization.
These positions are scientifically grounded but politically charged, which means:

  • Scientists generally respect his technical work,
  • Some policymakers and commentators see him as too alarmist,
  • Some activists think he is too pro‑nuclear,
  • But his scientific credibility remains intact.

🧩 Bottom line​

Within climate science, Hansen is viewed as a pioneering, highly credible figure whose work has shaped the field for decades. His reputation is strong, though his outspoken style means he is also a lightning rod in public discourse.



Can you even answer the most basic climate questions???


 
Oh, and do not take my word for it. Paul Ehlich's essay "Eco-Catastrophe!" is available for all to read.


In 1969 Dr. Ehlich wrote a book that was quite a sensation called "The Population Bomb". He even appeared on "The Tonight Show" to talk about it.



And over five decades later, he still claims he was right. That is fascinating to watch, as there is another guest on the show that systematically tears down every argument he makes, and he still doubles down and claims he is right. Meanwhile, we know the reality and that none of his predictions came true.




It isn't that hard to figure out Earth is finite and only a finite number of humans can live here.

These fires, they are stage 1, too many humans consuming too much land based fresh water and drying out plant life in the process.
 
1779500340672.webp
 
Ten years ago, Guy McPherson, a University of Arizona "Climate Science Expert" warned us we'd all be extinct by 2026. In fact, the world population has grown by 3/4 of a billion people since that time period. Yet, another failed gloom and doom prediction from the people who love to lecture the rest of us about how they are the ones who believe in science. They continue to blow smoke up our asses and wonder why they aren't taken as seriously anymore.

These people are frauds


Sounds like a religious leader.
 
Hell, want a real laugh? Try reading some of the predictions from the time of the first Earth Day in 1970.

Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 issue of Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”

“Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”

Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.

Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”

Ecologist Kenneth Watt told Time that, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Barry Commoner predicted that decaying organic pollutants would use up all of the oxygen in America’s rivers, causing freshwater fish to suffocate.

Paul Ehrlich chimed in, predicting in 1970 that “air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” Ehrlich sketched a scenario in which 200,000 Americans would die in 1973 during “smog disasters” in New York and Los Angeles.

Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared, “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”

Harrison Brown, a scientist at the National Academy of Sciences, published a chart in Scientific American that looked at metal reserves and estimated the humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990.

Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look that, “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”

Kenneth Watt warned about a pending Ice Age in a speech. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”

Now Ken Watt is interesting, as he was one of the biggest propagandists of the "New Ice Age" in the 1970s. Of course, in the late 1980s he then flipped to being one of the biggest propagandists of "Global Warming".

This is the biggest problem with all of these Doomsayers. Eventually the march of time catches up to them, and it is proven that their claims are just moonbeams and unicorn farts. And the most amazing thing is that they seem completely incapable of ever admitting they were wrong. They simply make more doomist predictions another 10-20 years in the future..


And every watermelon retard's favorite sir Attenborough

 
Back
Top Bottom