Gunfire will ring out in lib cities tonight; it's Friday and lib-city gun nuts are ready!!

[jknowgood]

By morning the streets of liberal-led cities will be littered with the dead and injured bodies of many Brown and Black people. Emergency rooms will be flooded.

you wont see any demonstrations, any riots.

If more of those people had more guns that would solve the problem, according to you.

So in your little mind a law abiding citizen is the same as a criminal?

No that's your belief since you don't want background checks that determine the difference.

We already have background checks dumbass.

 

[Timmy]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

Um, u are kinda ignoring a rather large amount of killing and murder prior to 1965. For example the CIVIL WAR and the genocide of Indians . Two quick examples that came to mind .

 

[HenryBHough]

Why are liberals like fire ants?

 

[bodecea]

Very true....be resigned to the fact that that's the way it is.

assualt rifles will be used on real live human beings tonight; in liberal-run cities of course

Well...that's the American way.

 

[bodecea]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

With so many christians, so many churches....we are godless?

 

[peach174]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

Um, u are kinda ignoring a rather large amount of killing and murder prior to 1965. For example the CIVIL WAR and the genocide of Indians . Two quick examples that came to mind .

2 bad things in our past and ignore the rest of good parts of that 174 years.
I think that after so many years of trying to get rid of slavery since the beginning of the nation, the Civil War had to happen.
The Indians themselves were not totally innocent either. Some of them wiped out other tribes all by themselves.

 

[peach174]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

With so many christians, so many churches....we are godless?

No God in schools any longer or government like it used to be, even before we became a nation.

 

[Bush92]

Democrats will kill Democrats in South Central L.A., South Chicago, N.O. and the Bronx etc.

 

[bodecea]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

Um, u are kinda ignoring a rather large amount of killing and murder prior to 1965. For example the CIVIL WAR and the genocide of Indians . Two quick examples that came to mind .

And the worse school massacre in the history of the US was in the early 1900s.

 

[rightwinger]

If more of those people had more guns that would solve the problem, according to you.

can you prove otherwise leftard?

we both wont know since you idiots made it extremely hard for LAW-ABIDING people on some liberal-run cities to get guns.

you also cant quantify violence that was avoided because the thug with a gun THOUGHT the other guy might have one

keep trying................

Okay, so we make it easier for gang members to get guns.

How will that make things better?

Convicted gang members don't have guns.

It's against the law.

It's not against the law to sell them a gun if they use the background check loopholes that people like you insist on maintaining.

How can I sell a gun to someone who is prevented by law from buying it?

How can we stop you from selling a gun to a drug dealer?

 

[rightwinger]

I fear people who are stupid enough to think that gun control will stop mass killings.

Yet it seems to do a good job in the rest of the world

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Second Amendment has been in places since 1791. For the next 174 years, there has not been a mass shooting of innocents on record. Yet, since 1965, we have had:

- University of Texas Shooting
- Fast Food Restaurant shootings in the 70s and 80s
- Columbine School Shootings
- Virginia Tech Shootings
- Ft. Hood Shootings
- Arizona Giffords Shooting
- Aurora Col. Movie Shooting
- Sandy Hook
- Charleston Baptist Church Shooting
- Oregon Community College

Can anyone answer the question why no mass shootings the first 174 years of the 1st Amendment yet so many mass shootings in the last 50 Years? Is it more guns per person or is it the culture of unAccountability?

Culture
They have turned us into a Godless secular society.

Um, u are kinda ignoring a rather large amount of killing and murder prior to 1965. For example the CIVIL WAR and the genocide of Indians . Two quick examples that came to mind .

so the civil war and battles with armed native Americans were carried out by an individual private citizen who sought to randomly shoit innocent people with a firearm just to kill them? Don't shift the goal post to debate the civil
War and takeover of land of Native Americans. The reality is that you can't find any analogous events involving random shooting of mass unarmed citizens like we have had in the last 50 years

 

[Timmy]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

 

[LeftofLeft]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

No. There is no implication that pre-1965 was utopia. There is no implication. It is explicit statement that pre-1965 saw no individual carry out a mass shooting against innocent unarmed people. The implication is that post 1965, there has been a catalytic shift in culture. Otherwise, how do you explain no mass shooting of innocent unarmed people by a lone gunman yet post-1965, we have had many.

A tell-take sign that a Liberal is incapable of intelligent debate is when they start personal insults, smears, and/or trying to shift the debate in hopes of making a legitimate counter argument on the subject matter at hand.

Simply stated: You Lose.

 

[rightwinger]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

No. There is no implication that pre-1965 was utopia. There is no implication. It is explicit statement that pre-1965 saw no individual carry out a mass shooting against innocent unarmed people. The implication is that post 1965, there has been a catalytic shift in culture. Otherwise, how do you explain no mass shooting of innocent unarmed people by a lone gunman yet post-1965, we have had many.

A tell-take sign that a Liberal is incapable of intelligent debate is when they start personal insults, smears, and/or trying to shift the debate in hopes of making a legitimate counter argument on the subject matter at hand.

Simply stated: You Lose.

That is an interesting point

In the 60s through 80s our gun nuts seemed to want to make their name through assassination. JFK, MLK, Malcolm X, RFK, Ford, Reagan

Then we got Columbine and they switched gears. Assasination was getting tougher but there were plenty of schools, movie theaters and malls to shoot up.

By the way, you need to look up Charles Whitman

 

[Timmy]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

No. There is no implication that pre-1965 was utopia. There is no implication. It is explicit statement that pre-1965 saw no individual carry out a mass shooting against innocent unarmed people. The implication is that post 1965, there has been a catalytic shift in culture. Otherwise, how do you explain no mass shooting of innocent unarmed people by a lone gunman yet post-1965, we have had many.

A tell-take sign that a Liberal is incapable of intelligent debate is when they start personal insults, smears, and/or trying to shift the debate in hopes of making a legitimate counter argument on the subject matter at hand.

Simply stated: You Lose.

Where did I insult you? Stop making shit up. As someone mentioned the worst gun massacre was in the 1800s. I'll look for it .

 

[Missouri_Mike]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

Nobody in conservative cities expect utopia. They expect what they earn. No freebies for voting the right way and no security provided by others. Utopia doesn't and never can exist. It's a pipe dream for idiots that hand over their lives to people promising them the impossible.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

There's a lot of screwed up crap in our history . To imply that pre 1965 was all sunshine is just idiotic .

Still waiting on my list of conservative city Utopias ? Anyone gonna answer ?

No. There is no implication that pre-1965 was utopia. There is no implication. It is explicit statement that pre-1965 saw no individual carry out a mass shooting against innocent unarmed people. The implication is that post 1965, there has been a catalytic shift in culture. Otherwise, how do you explain no mass shooting of innocent unarmed people by a lone gunman yet post-1965, we have had many.

A tell-take sign that a Liberal is incapable of intelligent debate is when they start personal insults, smears, and/or trying to shift the debate in hopes of making a legitimate counter argument on the subject matter at hand.

Simply stated: You Lose.

That is an interesting point

In the 60s through 80s our gun nuts seemed to want to make their name through assassination. JFK, MLK, Malcolm X, RFK, Ford, Reagan

Then we got Columbine and they switched gears. Assasination was getting tougher but there were plenty of schools, movie theaters and malls to shoot up.

By the way, you need to look up Charles Whitman

So gun free zones became the next place to kill people. Crazy isn't it?

 

[dilloduck]

B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-BUT I GOT A POSTER TO PROBE MY POINT!!

libs are idiots

My....shrill.

Reduced to ad homonyms again----you're becoming way to predictable and boring.

 

[Rotagilla]

What's the line on the over/under for chicago dead/wounded this weekend?

I'll take 10 dead and 18 wounded...