- Banned
- #41
No he was not. Why do you lie so glibly?I know hitler was a socialist. That you do not know this is the problem with people like you……
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No he was not. Why do you lie so glibly?I know hitler was a socialist. That you do not know this is the problem with people like you……
Handguns have been banned in England. Its been that way sense 97.
More drivel. We have the right to defend ourselves in propotion to the level of aggression faced, aka "reasonable force". You can harm an attacker up to a certain point. Marker Sprays and directional sonic weapons (rape alarms) are quite acceptable and generally very effective, as your own article states.
No he was not. Why do you lie so glibly?
What are they doing right? How do you know?
Everyone didn't sell heroin in the first place.Like how heroin was made illegal, and everyone stopped selling and using it!!!!!!!
Ah. You cannot cite specifics. No surprise.Taking guns seriously.
Fallacy: Post hoc ergo propter hoc.How do I know? Results.
If you have more guns and a deadlier range of guns per capita, the greater the casualties. It's not fucking rocket science.Ah. You cannot cite specifics. No surprise.
Fallacy: Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
reading comprehension evidently isn't your strong suit.Everyone didn't sell heroin in the first place.
fortunately heroin use and sales isn't a protected Constitutional right like having a gun is.Anyone with more than two brain cells understands that legislation/regulation on anything reduces and doesn't eliminate.
no fog here.That's why your brain is foggy with the subject !
You didNo one argued otherwise.
Ah. More guns = more gun "casualties".If you have more guns and a deadlier range of guns per capita, the greater the casualties.
Try replying to my "full" quote and quit the fucking cherry picking. I hate arseholes that do that.Ah. More guns = more gun "casualties".
Explain, then how gun-related "casualties" in the US fell 50% from 1993-2017 while the number of guns increased 30%.
He was a National Socialist. He was a socialist like any other socialist. You people work damn hard to distance yourselves from the Nazis, but you'll never take socialism out of National Socialism.No he was not. Why do you lie so glibly?
So... you , while arguing "more guns = more gun casualties", cannot explain how gun-related "casualties" in the US fell 50% from 1993-2017 while the number of guns increased 30%.Try replying to my "full" quote and quit the fucking cherry picking. I hate arseholes that do that.
They Mexicans do that and their murder rate is 3x that of the US.If you have more guns and a deadlier range of guns per capita, the greater the casualties. It's not fucking rocket science.
Seriously as in - no one needs to walk around in public with a gun. Guns should be locked away when not in use. Ammo should be locked away in a separate cabinet. Thorough checks should be made when applying for a gun licence. Have severe penalties for breaching any part of that. Regulate the type of gun that's actually needed
"its not fucking rocket science" somehow changes the quote?Try replying to my "full" quote and quit the fucking cherry picking. I hate arseholes that do that.
The gun nuts always latch onto that statistical crap.So... you , while arguing "more guns = more gun casualties", cannot explain how gun-related "casualties" in the US fell 50% from 1993-2017 while the number of guns increased 30%.
Got it.
Thanks
See my reply to your boyfriend."its not fucking rocket science" somehow changes the quote?
LOL.
And thus, your concession that you cannot explain how if, as you claim, more guns = more gun "casualties", said "casualties" fell 50% while the numbe rof guns increased ~30%The gun nuts always latch onto that statistical crap.
^^^^Taking guns seriously.
How do I know? Results.
You did