Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh noes, it would be horrible if you went 5 seconds without getting some attention.Maybe. I knew I could count on you to make something up. You can't even help yourself.
Dude get a life okay, look into the LEGAL reasons why the appeals court drastically cut this so called judgement. And would have further cut it to nothing had they already reviewed the case.
Just seeing if you had anything halfway intelligent to say.Oh noes, it would be horrible if you went 5 seconds without getting some attention.
Yeah, I heard financial backers won't touch New York after the Trump court case fiascoWrong, not even Obama could secure this bond, not with commercial real estate in a tailspin. Commercial real estate is in dire straights, hence nobody is looking to lend half a billion backed by commercial real estate.
Kevin O'Leary...'finally the adults in the room have stepped in'.
This likely has more to do with the reduction in the bond amount than anything political...and President Trump knew it.
Make them take Trump's assets.
They didn't have the scroat to go through with it...and see foreign investment capital in New York evaporate overnight.
According to media reports Letitia James was going to not only seize President Trump's properties but also not posting the bond would negate President Trump's ability to appeal this kangaroo court summary judgement decision.Who owns the assets, Trump personally or companies? You can't just take company assets, the director/CEO is a separate entity to the company(ies) they run.
abcnews.go.com
Kevin O'Leary...'finally the adults in the room have stepped in'.
This likely has more to do with the reduction in the bond amount than anything political...and President Trump knew it.
Make them take Trump's assets.
They didn't have the scroat to go through with it...and see foreign investment capital in New York evaporate overnight.
How would Letitia James seize something that Trump doesn't own, not in his name? Is this why the seizing stalled?According to media reports Letitia James was going to not only seize President Trump's properties but also not posting the bond would negate President Trump's ability to appeal this kangaroo court summary judgement decision.
Here are some of the Trump properties that Letitia James could seize in $464M judgment
With the New York AG considering seizing Trump's assets if he is unable to cover his $464 million fraud judgment, here's a look at Trump's properties and their worth.
SuuuureYeah, I heard financial backers won't touch New York after the Trump court case fiasco
Plenty of his properties are in his name.How would Letitia James seize something that Trump doesn't own, not in his name? Is this why the seizing stalled?
It was in your news??Suuuure
I think you just confused yourself. The laws that Trump broke are in place to protect investors.Like the ones you are talking about.
She is seizing company assets.How would Letitia James seize something that Trump doesn't own, not in his name? Is this why the seizing stalled?
Then they can go after those in his name alone, otherwise Letitia James would be breaking the law.Plenty of his properties are in his name.
With larger buildings one owner will be listed. But different entities can own portions of the buildings.
But do they belong to the shareholders?She is seizing company assets.
It was in your news??
Do you not follow your own news?
One hundred percent wrong of course. She would seize and sell off his portions of buildings. If he owns properties jointly with somebody then they will be compensated after the properties are seized and sold.Then they can go after those in his name alone, otherwise Letitia James would be breaking the law.
I can only tell you what the media is saying, and they claim to be citing Letitia James as their source.But do they belong to the shareholders?
I'm not defending or arguing for either side, just seeking clarity and trying remove any doubt if ant member on the board believes, "Just take properties", is a simple process
I watched a few, a little while ago, that was just a quick search. The one I saw was a top investor explaining the gravity of the Trump case, they couldn't risk billions of clients money so they halted investment.That's not the same thing. And thanks for the video you never watched.
And that was just a guy blowing smoke. They will invest where they can make money. And the laws the orange pile of shit broke are there to protect investors from felons like Trump who lie to them.I watched a few, a little while ago, that was just a quick search. The one I saw was a top investor explaining the gravity of the Trump case, they couldn't risk billions of clients money so they halted investment
Well, UK law is different to US law then, I suppose.One hundred percent wrong of course. She would seize and sell off his portions of buildings. If he owns properties jointly with somebody then they will be compensated after the properties are seized and sold.
