Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 18,320
- 20,115
- 2,288
Actually, it’s just a slight reprieve for judicial integrity.Credit where credit is due. This is a victory for Trump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, it’s just a slight reprieve for judicial integrity.Credit where credit is due. This is a victory for Trump.
Cry more, bitch.Not overturned:
Summary judgment
Trial verdict
Penalty amount
Incorrect. Its a private matter between Trump and NY. It doesn't positively benefit any citizen, or negatively.
Okay, makes sense. But that isn't really how it is used.1) synth didn’t provide any details about how they did it.
2) I’m just reading articles like the one I linked that says cross collateraliation is the process of using assets as collateral for two different loans and the article doesn’t specify that it doesn’t have to be with the same lender, in fact, it uses the plural lender(s) in explaining it, which would seem to indicate multiple lenders.
Well sure, if there is not enough equity, or your creditworthiness is garbage.No, not always.
You are expressing an idiotic opinion.
Incorrect. Its a private matter between Trump and NY. It doesn't positively benefit any citizen, or negatively.
What else would you expect from an idiot?You are expressing an idiotic opinion.
What else would you expect from an idiot?
There's many reasons. I would say Trump burnt too many bridges with the banks and the business world, that's bit him in the ass.Well sure, if there is not enough equity, or your creditworthiness is garbage.
And the top reasons are not enough equity and lack of creditworthiness.There's many reasons. I would say Trump burnt too many bridges with the banks and the business world, that's bit him in the ass.
Also after the financial crash, like in the UK, the government were trying to pump billions of cash into the economy via the banks, but the banks barely loaned any money out because new rules meant they had to pass a new liquidity standard to operate, so they were stockpiling money. So if you applied for a loan, you were probably knocked back.
I'm self employed, despite a high credit rating, banks won't do a mortgage with me, I asked my bank why, and they said, "Despite having such a large deposit, if things went base over apex, the self employed tend to walk away and start again". So that's why Santander refused my mortgage loan.
Like I said, there's many reasons if look beyond an immature agenda.
Wrong, not even Obama could secure this bond, not with commercial real estate in a tailspin. Commercial real estate is in dire straights, hence nobody is looking to lend half a billion backed by commercial real estate.I would say Trump burnt too many bridges with the banks and the business world, that's bit him in the ass.
Please pay attention. We were talking about trump getting loans on properties to generate funds to secure the bond with the peope putting up the bind.Wrong, not even Obama could secure this bond, not with commercial real estate in a tailspin.
Haha, what a moronvery quickly within the 10 days
He doesn't need a loan now, tissue? I guess you Dems will have to come up with some new scheme. Better hurry Trump's about to add another $4 billion to his wealth. Hilarious, Dem scheming and corruption lead Trump to start Truth Social...Trump banks $4 billion on the deal.Please pay attention. We were talking about trump getting loans on properties to generate funds to secure the bond with the peope putting up the bind.
Maybe. I knew I could count on you to make something up. You can't even help yourself.He doesn't need a loan now,