Zone1 Greta Thunberg - Did you change your opinion about her?

[Robert W]

She will get a Nobel Prize before Trump

Norway is that shitty?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

really?

.

She's trolling you. It's her superpower.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Norway is that shitty?

.

Norway is complete trash.

They think St. Nicholas is queer.



.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

No idea what any of that means.

TRANSLATION: "Outta my league"

 

[hadit]

Have you seen Trumps haircut?

She needs to be in school, not being exploited by the left, only to be dropped as useless once she becomes useless..

 

[citygator]

TRANSLATION: "Outta my league"

Let's ask ChatGPT:

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Meh. Greta is a young woman trying to make a positive difference.

yeah, you were closer to the truth when you claimed she was there to raise funds.

That is more than I can say about most people and almost every maga supporter.

And you find this relative to me why?...and does invoking/evoking "maga" mean you are increasing their effectiveness?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Let's ask ChatGPT:

Ask them what?

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Pro-environment and pro-peace. She sounds like a really good apple. Plus she has people posting about her constantly so I’d call her effective too.

Outside the DC beltway, exactly who ISN'T 'pro-environment and pro-peace?'

 

[citygator]

Ask them what?

Do you not know how a message board works? I posted a picture of the response. An AI bot wouldnt be able to read the post but a human would. You are human, right?

In case you are AI and cant read that picture here is the text response:

is this gibberish "Moving the goal posts in the name of effectiveness only makes the case for trump stronger as CC is as dead in the water as those who need a sympathetic martyr hope the gaza flotilla will be...imagine the "effectiveness" of that!"?

---

​

Yes, that sentence is mostly gibberish, or at least convoluted to the point of incoherence. Let’s break it down and evaluate where it fails:

---

​

“Moving the goal posts in the name of effectiveness only makes the case for Trump stronger as CC is as dead in the water as those who need a sympathetic martyr hope the Gaza flotilla will be...imagine the 'effectiveness' of that!”

---

​

• It seems to be accusing someone (possibly liberals or critics of Trump) of changing standards ("moving the goalposts").
• Claims that this makes Trump’s case stronger.
• Mentions "CC" (unexplained acronym — Climate Change? Christian Coalition? Cancel Culture? Unclear).
• Then introduces "dead in the water", possibly comparing CC to the Gaza flotilla — a reference that is politically charged and context-dependent.
• Ends with a sarcastic line about the “effectiveness” of something, possibly mocking a failed protest or strategy.

---

​

• No clear subject or structure: The sentence piles metaphor upon metaphor without anchoring any of them.
• Unexplained references: “CC” and “Gaza flotilla” lack explanation, making it impenetrable to a casual reader.
• Mixed metaphors: “Dead in the water,” “sympathetic martyr,” “moving goalposts,” and “effectiveness” all point in different directions.
• Tone is muddled: It attempts sarcasm or critique but lacks clarity in who or what it is critiquing.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Meh. Greta is a young woman trying to make a positive difference. That is more than I can say about most people and almost every maga supporter.

Let's ask ChatGPT:

See how that works?

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Neither did consent.

View attachment 1166495

Ok... THAT was funny.

 

[Zebra]

.

She's trolling you. It's her superpower.

.

me personally?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Do you not know how a message board works? I posted a picture of the response. An AI bot wouldnt be able to read the post but a human would. You are human, right?

In case you are AI and cant read that picture here is the text response:

is this gibberish "Moving the goal posts in the name of effectiveness only makes the case for trump stronger as CC is as dead in the water as those who need a sympathetic martyr hope the gaza flotilla will be...imagine the "effectiveness" of that!"?

TRANSLATION: "I'm trying to extricate myself from the quagmire I find myself in, perhaps this nonsense will work"

 

[FoghornLeghorn]

When is Greta going to protest in North Korea, where extreme human rights crimes are taking place? She's a parrot for the radical left.

 

[citygator]

TRANSLATION: "I'm trying to extricate myself from the quagmire I find myself in, perhaps this nonsense will work"

Might be a little late for you to save this. Might just want to move on . The ChatGPT analysis I posted in was hilarious.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

She will get a Nobel Prize before Trump

Like arafat it's all dependent on what she does to the Jews, trump will have to distance himself from them if he wants one before her, ...besides he has more golf trophies which are far more difficult to come by.

 

[Hafar1014]

Thunberg is a troll

And probably brain damaged

She has autism

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Might be a little late for you to save this.

Save what?

Might just want to move on .

SEE: post#54

The ChatGPT analysis I posted in was hilarious.

That I will give you. Couldn't agree more.

 

[BothWings]

she certainly is outstanding.
but not in a good way any more

Not ever, IMO. It just took awhile for some people to see she never was anything but a little troll in disguise; the globalist left was just dressing her up as their poster child. After awhile she grew out of the disguise.