Greenlanders dreaming of something they will never have

Why do you think there is only one country that can give them lasting independence? Please explain
There are sovereign entities throughout the world that could by targets for imperialistic ambitions under the guise of altruism.

E.g., Russia/Ukraine
 
As an American my question is this: Is Greenland becoming a U.S. territory going to benefit poor and middle-class Americans or only the rich as usual? My guess is it's the latter. Poor and middle-class Americans will be Indentured to pay for development there and get nothing tangible in return. And yes, I voted for Trump.
The principal benefit of acquiring Greenland would be US national security, which benefits all Americans. How would poor and middle class Americans become indentured to pay for development? On the contrary, they would enjoy greater job opportunities and income. The fixed-pie theory is about two centuries out of date.
 
The principal benefit of acquiring Greenland would be US national security, which benefits all Americans. How would poor and middle class Americans become indentured to pay for development? On the contrary, they would enjoy greater job opportunities and income. The fixed-pie theory is about two centuries out of date.
It could be argued that he United States exercising dominion over all North and South American nations, as well as all European ones, could increase the security of all Americans.

If sovereign nations wish to remain sovereign, such imperialistic acquisitiveness is prohibited. When the vast majority of American concur with their resolve to maintain their independence, such a usurpation is not about to happen.


 
Last edited:
It could be argued that he United States exercising dominion over all North and South American nations, as well as all European ones, could increase the security of all Americans.

If sovereign nations wish to remain sovereign, such imperialistic acquisitiveness is prohibited. When the vast majority of American concur with their resolve to maintain their independence, such a usurpation is not about to happen.


Too fucking cold both places. Nah. We dont want it.
 
Greenland has a workable economy. They have a fishing industry that sustains 55,000 people.
It has sustained them for hundreds of years.

Can it do better?
Of course it can.
They can expand the mining of rare minerals
They can expand tourism.

But they don’t need Trump to do that and they rightfully do not trust him.
Why haven't they done it on their own?
 

Greenland cannot remain independent.. Even what they have now is only an illusion of independence. That doesn't mean they have to submit to tyranny but it does mean they have to make a choice and they need to make one soon.
Without anyway to defend either their waterways or their acreage Greenland's claim to independence is nothing but a fairytale.

Going forward They will not be able sustain any kind of workable economy, provide any real security or even make decisions about the development of their land. Trump is right... in this condition Greenland presents a security threat to North America.

This is not hard to understand.
Greenland isn’t independent
 
Correct , self autonomous much like Catalonia is with Spain. Someday they may both be independent nations.
Yes they are subject of a king

They long for freedom
 
Yes they are subject of a king

They long for freedom
The king has very little power , although the monarch signs all legislation ( ergo constitutional monarchy) he cannot take any political action himself. Everything goes through the legislature.
 
The child will be throwing another temper tantrum no doubt.

Screen Shot 2022-07-27 at 7.43.14 AM.webp

 
The king has very little power , although the monarch signs all legislation ( ergo constitutional monarchy) he cannot take any political action himself. Everything goes through the legislature.
Yes I am aware how a constitutional monarchy works, it changes nothing about my post
 
It could be argued that he United States exercising dominion over all North and South American nations, as well as all European ones, could increase the security of all Americans.

If sovereign nations wish to remain sovereign, such imperialistic acquisitiveness is prohibited. When the vast majority of American concur with their resolve to maintain their independence, such a usurpation is not about to happen.


So, you spew America as an isolationist nation with Trump and now this is not, and it irks you.
 
So, you spew America as an isolationist nation with Trump and now this is not, and it irks you.
You seem to fancy that isolationism is not bullying other nations into submission.

Mutual respect for sovereignty is a disparate matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom