GOP working on legislation to strip Twitter of federal liability protections

Obama twists the law into a pretzel to authorize the FBI to spy on President Trump and his family. Democrats say "COOL!" President Trump signs an EO to call out obviously partisan social media platforms for selective harassment and censorship and Democrats squeal like stuck pigs.
Well that's a lie.





No, it's a fact. obummer tried to turn us into a third world shithole. And if Trump had lost none of obummers crimes would have been discovered.
Doubling down on your lie does not make it true.
He isn't lying, too bad Obama will never go to jail over this. But his corrupt administration getting exposed will all we will get. But you dumbasses will still polish his knob.
Trump is a reckless, irresponsible authoritarian who has nothing but contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.

And Trump’s enablers are just as authoritarian and have the same contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.






And you can't point to a single violation of the COTUS. While I can point to three with your hero, the obummer. That makes you an epic failure of a pseudo intellectual.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.
 
This is one hell of a distraction from the miserable job Trump has done with regard to the pandemic. By far, the U.S. leads the world in virus deaths, 103,297 and counting.

To give everyone an idea how incredibly stupid all this is, Trump claimed that he and other conservatives have been victims of “censorship” by social media providers. He offers no proof of this bias, but we do know that the news media which accurately reports his statements and decisions is regarded as "fake news." Trump, of course, would regard the accurate recording as bias. Uncovering his lies is the entire basis for the unfortunate executive order.

Private companies do not practice censorship by regulating content by their users. Why? If a customer doesn't like what the private company is doing, the customer takes his business elsewhere. Twitter -- the focus of Trump's angst -- is not violating the First Amendment by marking up his tweets. Unlike the government, Twitter is a private company that can moderate its users’ speech as it pleases, without legal penalty.

What our President does not know is that only central governments can practice censorship!

Such as, for example, a nation's leader issuing an order to regulate private companies in the tech sector.

Moreover, Trump is shooting himself in the foot from the perspective of a supernova in the Twittersphere which by the latest count has published 50,000 times under the handle @realDonaldTrump.

Incredibly, Trump is dumb enough to attack his own main tool in communicating with his base. How dumb is that?

A wide array of critics in Congress, the tech industry and across the political spectrum also accused Trump of deputizing government agencies to carry out his personal vendettas. Namely, Trump's uncontrolled anger at Twitter for fact checking his lies.
 
Obama twists the law into a pretzel to authorize the FBI to spy on President Trump and his family. Democrats say "COOL!" President Trump signs an EO to call out obviously partisan social media platforms for selective harassment and censorship and Democrats squeal like stuck pigs.
Well that's a lie.





No, it's a fact. obummer tried to turn us into a third world shithole. And if Trump had lost none of obummers crimes would have been discovered.
Doubling down on your lie does not make it true.
He isn't lying, too bad Obama will never go to jail over this. But his corrupt administration getting exposed will all we will get. But you dumbasses will still polish his knob.
Trump is a reckless, irresponsible authoritarian who has nothing but contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.

And Trump’s enablers are just as authoritarian and have the same contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.

Spot on!
Full of lies, Trump works for all Americans. Democrats work only for themselves. Biden is proof. Work for goverment all of his life, and his entire family is multi millionaires.
View attachment 342209
Hatred comes from loving this country and protecting it from the thieves who steal from it.
That's exactly why Biden shouldn't be president. He has sold us out to China.
87365688_2655057201287228_5193379359452299264_n.jpg
87365688_2655057201287228_5193379359452299264_n.jpg

You're an idiot.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?
So when the media spreads lies about him it's okay, but it's not okay for him to go after them?
What lies?
Russian collusion lie for three years and still claims it.
He told Americans to inject bleach. To name a few many more, they are daily on here.
Russian collusion was proven to have happened. The Trump tower meeting was collusion.
Then why wasn't he impeached for it?b
Because collusion by itself is not a crime. A conspiracy to collude is. Do you understand the difference? The only thing that saved Trump from the conspiracy part, was that it could not be proven Trump and the Russians had an agreement.

There was nothing between Rump and Russia. Nothing.
Mueller seemed to think so. He claims Trump can be indicted for obstruction when he leaves office, and our entire intelligence department tells us you haven't a clue about Russia helping Trump. It's already been confirmed. Denials aren't going to change reality.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.

It's so funny how you use the word debate, which is about winning the argument....not being right.

Then talk about the "wrong cause" (repeat...debate isn't about right or wrong....it's about doing it better, dumbass).

The bigger picture.....you ascribe all kinds of reasons to your conclusion...not of which are provable and none of which are supported.

Then you lie (unless you want to show us your metrics for how you claim the right gets it's ass kicked every day).

You are full of shit.

You have always been full of shit.

At least you are consistent.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

Your faux rage is noted. When Obama couldn't get immigration laws change in congress and he ignored the legislative branch and rewrote them himself none of you leftist had a problem with abuse of the power of the presidency. Hence you have zero credibility here.
But Obama! Lol! Another one searching for a legitimate argument while scapegoating someone else. These folks, just don't have what it takes.

We are mocking the left's blatant double standards and phony faux rage, suck it. Be thankful we don't confine the left to gulags.
As if you could. :laugh: I know you are serious.

If ever there's a civil war again your side won't survive sorry.
 
Obama twists the law into a pretzel to authorize the FBI to spy on President Trump and his family. Democrats say "COOL!" President Trump signs an EO to call out obviously partisan social media platforms for selective harassment and censorship and Democrats squeal like stuck pigs.
Well that's a lie.





No, it's a fact. obummer tried to turn us into a third world shithole. And if Trump had lost none of obummers crimes would have been discovered.
Doubling down on your lie does not make it true.
He isn't lying, too bad Obama will never go to jail over this. But his corrupt administration getting exposed will all we will get. But you dumbasses will still polish his knob.
Trump is a reckless, irresponsible authoritarian who has nothing but contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.

And Trump’s enablers are just as authoritarian and have the same contempt for the rule of law, our democratic institutions, and the Constitution.

Spot on!
Full of lies, Trump works for all Americans. Democrats work only for themselves. Biden is proof. Work for goverment all of his life, and his entire family is multi millionaires.
View attachment 342209
Hatred comes from loving this country and protecting it from the thieves who steal from it.
That's exactly why Biden shouldn't be president. He has sold us out to China.
View attachment 342215View attachment 342215
You're an idiot.
And you're looking for an argument you never had.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?
So when the media spreads lies about him it's okay, but it's not okay for him to go after them?
What lies?
Russian collusion lie for three years and still claims it.
He told Americans to inject bleach. To name a few many more, they are daily on here.
Russian collusion was proven to have happened. The Trump tower meeting was collusion.
Then why wasn't he impeached for it?b
Because collusion by itself is not a crime. A conspiracy to collude is. Do you understand the difference? The only thing that saved Trump from the conspiracy part, was that it could not be proven Trump and the Russians had an agreement.

There was nothing between Rump and Russia. Nothing.
Mueller seemed to think so. He claims Trump can be indicted for obstruction when he leaves office, and our entire intelligence department tells us you haven't a clue about Russia helping Trump. It's already been confirmed. Denials aren't going to change reality.

Confirmed ?

Byt Peter Strozck (or whatever the fucker's name is).
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?
So when the media spreads lies about him it's okay, but it's not okay for him to go after them?
What lies?
Russian collusion lie for three years and still claims it.
He told Americans to inject bleach. To name a few many more, they are daily on here.
Russian collusion was proven to have happened. The Trump tower meeting was collusion.
Then why wasn't he impeached for it?b
Because collusion by itself is not a crime. A conspiracy to collude is. Do you understand the difference? The only thing that saved Trump from the conspiracy part, was that it could not be proven Trump and the Russians had an agreement.

There was nothing between Rump and Russia. Nothing.
Mueller seemed to think so. He claims Trump can be indicted for obstruction when he leaves office, and our entire intelligence department tells us you haven't a clue about Russia helping Trump. It's already been confirmed. Denials aren't going to change reality.

Mueller had nothing, not one thing. Mueller was dancing to the tune he was instructed to dance to.
 
I’m just telling you the truth and how your desires will destroy the internet.
How so?

The internet meets the definition of a platform.

GOOGLE has blown its platform protections, but GOOGLE is not "the internet."

The internet is a completely open place. Anyone who wants to engage in speech can. I’m not stopping anyone. What you’re demanding is the ability to use Twitter’s property to publish a disseminate speech to their own detriment.
What do you mean? I am not, nor is the POTUS via the EO, demanding ANYTHING.

Twitter is acting like a fucking newspaper (editing content). They get no 230 protections if they act like a newspaper. They can still do their left-wing thought policing all they want. They just don't get to hide behind 230 protections.

It's that fucking simple.

.
No one edited Trump’s tweet. They don’t alter tweets. Sometimes they delete them for violating policy.

Thats exactly what 230 was intended to let them do without being subject to liability.

It’s that fucking simple.
AG Barr, who was also in attendance, said Section 230 "was stretched way beyond its original intention...its purpose was to allow websites that were acting virtually as bulletin boards were not responsible for third-party information...". When they "curate" their collection and start "censoring" particular content, they become publishers, and they shouldn't be entitled to the same kind of shield that was set up earlier. He also explained how the executive order sets up a "rule making procedure for the FCC" to try and "get back to the original interpretation" of Section 230.
-----
so since they abused the fuck out of it, it's time we re-examine it. now, the irony is Section 230 was put in place so tech companies wouldn't be responsible for 3rd party content. it was supposed to prevent censorship out of fear of litigation.

oops.
You’ve got it backwards. Before section 230, if a website never “censored” (to use your language not mine) then they wouldn’t be responsible for third party content.

But most people agreed that was a bad situation because guess what? There’s a lot of filth on the internet and we thought it’d be better if websites were allowed to clean up that filth without having to abandon their immunity from litigation.

Section 230 was specifically designed to give websites the ability to “censor”.

So I’ll ask you, respectfully, what is the goal? What do you hope to accomplish?
Social media has no business inserting itself into fact checking.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.

It's so funny how you use the word debate, which is about winning the argument....not being right.

Then talk about the "wrong cause" (repeat...debate isn't about right or wrong....it's about doing it better, dumbass).

The bigger picture.....you ascribe all kinds of reasons to your conclusion...not of which are provable and none of which are supported.

Then you lie (unless you want to show us your metrics for how you claim the right gets it's ass kicked every day).

You are full of shit.

You have always been full of shit.

At least you are consistent.
And here we are again, watching you circle jerking around the same post as the first. Just different words. Except the words never say anything.

And by the way, everything has been proven and supported. We have the legal documentation against Trump, and you have nothing. Trump is a criminal and we proved it thousands of times.
 
They just can't be shielded from liability for defamation on their publication.

In other words, if Trump gets his way, Trump can sue Twitter if they do something he doesn't like.
No. But, thank you for demonstrating to the world how uninformed (at best) you are.

They can't be shielded from liability for defamatory comments made by users.

.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.

It's so funny how you use the word debate, which is about winning the argument....not being right.

Then talk about the "wrong cause" (repeat...debate isn't about right or wrong....it's about doing it better, dumbass).

The bigger picture.....you ascribe all kinds of reasons to your conclusion...not of which are provable and none of which are supported.

Then you lie (unless you want to show us your metrics for how you claim the right gets it's ass kicked every day).

You are full of shit.

You have always been full of shit.

At least you are consistent.
And here we are again, watching you circle jerking around the same post as the first. Just different words. Except the words never say anything.

And by the way, everything has been proven and supported. We have the legal documentation against Trump, and you have nothing. Trump is a criminal and we proved it thousands of times.

I proved your post was bullshit.

And nothing has been proven. Your attempts failed......you don't have fuck.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?
So when the media spreads lies about him it's okay, but it's not okay for him to go after them?
What lies?
Russian collusion lie for three years and still claims it.
He told Americans to inject bleach. To name a few many more, they are daily on here.
Russian collusion was proven to have happened. The Trump tower meeting was collusion.
Then why wasn't he impeached for it?b
Because collusion by itself is not a crime. A conspiracy to collude is. Do you understand the difference? The only thing that saved Trump from the conspiracy part, was that it could not be proven Trump and the Russians had an agreement.

There was nothing between Rump and Russia. Nothing.
Mueller seemed to think so. He claims Trump can be indicted for obstruction when he leaves office, and our entire intelligence department tells us you haven't a clue about Russia helping Trump. It's already been confirmed. Denials aren't going to change reality.

Confirmed ?

Byt Peter Strozck (or whatever the fucker's name is).
By our intelligence agencies. Look it up. It's a fine read. But I always seem to forget, these Trump toads aren't interested in the truth. So stay ignorant my friend.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?
So when the media spreads lies about him it's okay, but it's not okay for him to go after them?
What lies?
Russian collusion lie for three years and still claims it.
He told Americans to inject bleach. To name a few many more, they are daily on here.
Russian collusion was proven to have happened. The Trump tower meeting was collusion.
Then why wasn't he impeached for it?b
Because collusion by itself is not a crime. A conspiracy to collude is. Do you understand the difference? The only thing that saved Trump from the conspiracy part, was that it could not be proven Trump and the Russians had an agreement.

There was nothing between Rump and Russia. Nothing.
Mueller seemed to think so. He claims Trump can be indicted for obstruction when he leaves office, and our entire intelligence department tells us you haven't a clue about Russia helping Trump. It's already been confirmed. Denials aren't going to change reality.

Confirmed ?

Byt Peter Strozck (or whatever the fucker's name is).
By our intelligence agencies. Look it up. It's a fine read. But I always seem to forget, these Trump toads aren't interested in the truth. So stay ignorant my friend.

Yes, I know you worship at the feed of anyone who'll confirm your fantasy.

How is the Strozcster doing anyway ?
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.

It's so funny how you use the word debate, which is about winning the argument....not being right.

Then talk about the "wrong cause" (repeat...debate isn't about right or wrong....it's about doing it better, dumbass).

The bigger picture.....you ascribe all kinds of reasons to your conclusion...not of which are provable and none of which are supported.

Then you lie (unless you want to show us your metrics for how you claim the right gets it's ass kicked every day).

You are full of shit.

You have always been full of shit.

At least you are consistent.
And here we are again, watching you circle jerking around the same post as the first. Just different words. Except the words never say anything.

And by the way, everything has been proven and supported. We have the legal documentation against Trump, and you have nothing. Trump is a criminal and we proved it thousands of times.

I proved your post was bullshit.

And nothing has been proven. Your attempts failed......you don't have fuck.
Look at this boy saying nothing as always. Enlighten yourself with knowledge, facts, and the truth sometime. It will take the boredom out of your posts.
 
This is one hell of a distraction from the miserable job Trump has done with regard to the pandemic. By far, the U.S. leads the world in virus deaths, 103,297 and counting.

To give everyone an idea how incredibly stupid all this is, Trump claimed that he and other conservatives have been victims of “censorship” by social media providers. He offers no proof of this bias, but we do know that the news media which accurately reports his statements and decisions is regarded as "fake news." Trump, of course, would regard the accurate recording as bias. Uncovering his lies is the entire basis for the unfortunate executive order.

Private companies do not practice censorship by regulating content by their users. Why? If a customer doesn't like what the private company is doing, the customer takes his business elsewhere. Twitter -- the focus of Trump's angst -- is not violating the First Amendment by marking up his tweets. Unlike the government, Twitter is a private company that can moderate its users’ speech as it pleases, without legal penalty.

What our President does not know is that only central governments can practice censorship!

Such as, for example, a nation's leader issuing an order to regulate private companies in the tech sector.

Moreover, Trump is shooting himself in the foot from the perspective of a supernova in the Twittersphere which by the latest count has published 50,000 times under the handle @realDonaldTrump.

Incredibly, Trump is dumb enough to attack his own main tool in communicating with his base. How dumb is that?

A wide array of critics in Congress, the tech industry and across the political spectrum also accused Trump of deputizing government agencies to carry out his personal vendettas. Namely, Trump's uncontrolled anger at Twitter for fact checking his lies.
The issue is Twitter being shielded from liability for defamatory comments made by users. Once they started editing content that is not "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable" Twitter gave up their 230 protections. They are now just as liable as CNN would be for defaming people, even if it was their own users who posted the defamatory content.

That's all that happened.

.
 

I suppose the First Amendment only limits The Congress to obey the First Amendment, and once again Donald Trump believes he is above the law, even when that law it not statutory, but number one in the Bill of Rights. What next, locking up those who criticize him with no regards to the 4th, 5th and 6th articles in the Bill of Rights?

TDS thread 1,641
A post in search of debate.

Won't fine one here.

Bullshit is bullshit.

Fuck off.
Lol! Says the one who shows up to say nothing. You couldn't carry on an honest, intelligent debate if your life depended on it. And why is that? You support the wrong cause and the wrong people. That's why the Right gets hammered on this forum every day. They have nothing to debate.

It's so funny how you use the word debate, which is about winning the argument....not being right.

Then talk about the "wrong cause" (repeat...debate isn't about right or wrong....it's about doing it better, dumbass).

The bigger picture.....you ascribe all kinds of reasons to your conclusion...not of which are provable and none of which are supported.

Then you lie (unless you want to show us your metrics for how you claim the right gets it's ass kicked every day).

You are full of shit.

You have always been full of shit.

At least you are consistent.
And here we are again, watching you circle jerking around the same post as the first. Just different words. Except the words never say anything.

And by the way, everything has been proven and supported. We have the legal documentation against Trump, and you have nothing. Trump is a criminal and we proved it thousands of times.

I proved your post was bullshit.

And nothing has been proven. Your attempts failed......you don't have fuck.
Look at this boy saying nothing as always. Enlighten yourself with knowledge, facts, and the truth sometime. It will take the boredom out of your posts.

I would not say you say nothing. That would only be on your good days. Otherwise, it's bullshit.

Truth ? The hair you take off of Nancy Pelosi's ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top