Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Because higher education is a campaign contribution cash cow for the Democratic party that's why. Tuition would not be astronomical if not for the government guaranteed loans because lenders wouldn't loan a mush brain college student $150k without those guarantees. Typical of the dumb fuck Democrats they have enslaved young college students to student loan debt, there's over $1 trillion of student loan debt on the books now.
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
The Republican policy document urges officials to crack down on public institutions for being "zones of intellectual intolerance favoring the Left." "Ideological bias is deeply entrenched with the current university system," it claims, warning that trustees of state institutions have a responsibility to the public to ensure that public dollars not be used for "political indoctrination." Elsewhere, the platform reiterates Republican opposition to the Dream Act, which provides a way for undocumented students brought here as young children to go to college and work toward citizenship.
The Republican platform next turns to what in higher education is uppermost in Americans' minds—college costs and recent graduates' struggles to repay student loans while facing prospects of unemployment or underemployment. One answer from the Republicans: de-emphasize traditional higher education and, for the masses, create programs directly related to job opportunities. "New systems of learning are needed to compete with traditional four-year colleges: expanded community colleges and technical institutions, private training schools, online universities, life-long learning, and work-based learning in the private sector."
- See more at: GOP platform attacks higher education American Federation of Teachers
yes they are willing to make us all like them...uneducated fools......so the rich can get richer....
link?oh but they don't care about that. government is there to TAKE CARE of us aren't they?
propaganda from the leftwing hate sites and their followers isn't the reality the rest of us live in
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
That was a horribly ignorant post. Shockingly so in fact. I'd say trying to have a conversation with such limited understanding of a subject as you displayed would only produce a negative result.
You would be appear to be the useful idiot here.Democrats are patriots too. But Conservatives (who seem to be wanting one party rule according to your little rant here) accomplices for wage disparity. Dupes. Rubes. Useful Idiots.This is the stupidity of dimocrap scum.
If Education is a KNOWN impetus to higher Earnings......
If we KNOW FOR A FACT that better educated people make more money than lesser educated people.......
And we also know for a fact that the scum of the earth dimocraps pride themselves on being BETTER EDUCATED than Patriotic Conservatives....
Then HOW IN THE FUCK can we be the Party of The Rich?
How can Patriotic Conservative Americans be UNDER-EDUCATED AND THE PARTY OF THE RICH???????
dimocraps aren't just the scum of the earth..... People, they're just plain, down on the farm, stupid.
The world would truly be a much better place without dimocraps
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
That was a horribly ignorant post. Shockingly so in fact. I'd say trying to have a conversation with such limited understanding of a subject as you displayed would only produce a negative result.
Plus you would get bored to death before you finished reading all that nonsense.
Tuition has skyrocketed with those "inexpensive" student loans. The loan may be cheaper but since it's backed by Uncle Sam they are borrowing a LOT more money! And more than a few default on their loans so I doubt it's cheaper to the tax payer. The primary purpose is to indoctrinate young minds on the goodness of big government and what all it can do for us. If the student actually pays back the loan so much the better.What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
The Republican policy document urges officials to crack down on public institutions for being "zones of intellectual intolerance favoring the Left." "Ideological bias is deeply entrenched with the current university system," it claims, warning that trustees of state institutions have a responsibility to the public to ensure that public dollars not be used for "political indoctrination." Elsewhere, the platform reiterates Republican opposition to the Dream Act, which provides a way for undocumented students brought here as young children to go to college and work toward citizenship.
The Republican platform next turns to what in higher education is uppermost in Americans' minds—college costs and recent graduates' struggles to repay student loans while facing prospects of unemployment or underemployment. One answer from the Republicans: de-emphasize traditional higher education and, for the masses, create programs directly related to job opportunities. "New systems of learning are needed to compete with traditional four-year colleges: expanded community colleges and technical institutions, private training schools, online universities, life-long learning, and work-based learning in the private sector."
- See more at: GOP platform attacks higher education American Federation of Teachers
yes they are willing to make us all like them...uneducated fools......so the rich can get richer....
See, here is your mistake. Your first mistake is posting here. Your second mistake is posting as a liberal. Your third mistake is not knowing the facts. Your fourth mistake is thinking you do.Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
lets me think here ...the lie....gop is giving tax cuts to the rich while cutting funds for higher education to the bone.....where in lies the lie?
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
No. We don't want that. We just want morons like you to stop listening to childish spin and start applying your brains to understanding the true motivations of GOP initiatives.The gop makes me sick. So you want us to be like mexico with a large lower class and a tiny rich??? You fools are going to lose again.
Because spending more on education means the quality is better. Right?Why is their never any concern for the astronomical increases in tuition and fees? It's just accepted? Why is that?
Since the govt has now nationalized student loans, the student is indebted to the govt for decades. Nice racket academia world and govt have together.
What you don't know is that when the student loan program started it was what you call nationalized. However even when it was privatized in the banks, it was still nationalized.
reagan turned it over to banks (privatized) when he was president. The way it was set up was the student borrowed from a private bank and if the student didn't pay the loan back, the government did. Plus the government paid high fees to the banks for processing the loans and maintaining them. It cost us something like 65 billion a year.
I believe it's much better to do it directly through the government so that it costs less. We're no longer paying that 65 billion a year to those banks. The government now gets the benefit of the money generated from those loans. reagan changed it so that it's a win/win for banks and they raked in billions off the government and from students.
Whenever anything is privatized it cost more money because that private institution has to make a profit.
I don't understand why so many people don't realize that privatizing anything makes it much more expensive because there has to be a profit in it for that business. That profit usually is such high levels that the private institution makes a boat load of money. In the cause of student loans, they made that money from us taxpayers and from students who didn't have the money.
They're making even more from the students now.
