What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

GOP Document Dump Exposes Libyans Working With U.S.

J.E.D

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
14,159
Reaction score
2,229
Points
280
Desperate to regain ground on the Benghazi talking point after Obama smacked Romney down during their second debate, House Oversight Committee Chairman Joe McCarthy -- err, I mean Darrell Issa, posted pages of documents related to the attack without redacting sensitive information, such as the names of Libyans working with the US.

:clap2: Good job, Issa. All in the name of justice, right?

Benghazi Consulate Attack: Darrell Issa Releases Raw Libya Cables, Obama Administration Cries Foul

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R- Calif.) has come under fire after posting 166 pages of "sensitive but unclassified" State Department cables online Friday afternoon.

The documents relate to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and four others. Administration officials, speaking with Foreign Policy magazine, accused Issa of endangering the safety of Libyans working with the U.S. government, whose names were not redacted from the report:

Much like WikiLeaks, when you dump a bunch of documents into the ether, there are a lot of unintended consequences," an administration official told The Cable Friday afternoon. "This does damage to the individuals because they are named, danger to security cooperation because these are militias and groups that we work with and that is now well known, and danger to the investigation, because these people could help us down the road.
 

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods
So Issa is a crook AND a dumb ass. How comforting.
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
60,843
Reaction score
8,220
Points
2,040
Location
Portland, Ore.
As with the outing of the CIA operative during the Bush Admin, the GOP cares nothing about whom they hurt or how it affects National Security. It is all about politics, and human lives are irrelevant.
 
OP
J.E.D

J.E.D

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
14,159
Reaction score
2,229
Points
280

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods
So Issa is a crook AND a dumb ass. How comforting.

Actually, Issa is showing us that Obama is a crook and a dumb ass.

Vote responsibly next time.

Except he hasn't. So far he's shown us that he can use his office for partisan witch hunts...that's about it. Oh, and he's shown us how he knows how to steal cars. Who better to come up with a device to thwart assholes like him though.
 

gkjpalmer

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
109
Reaction score
23
Points
6
This once again demonstrates Republican Disconnect from the rest of the planet.
So hell bent are they on seizing power and control, they simply desecrate notions of decency, including National Security and human life.
 

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods

SniperFire

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reaction score
1,226
Points
48
Location
Inside Your Head

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods

Okay then. Let's assume that Issa was trying to expose the President as a liar and a crook and not expose himself as an incompetent boob...

What did the document dump show that exposed the President as you claim?

If you feel that why, why are you melting down?


The truth shall set you free.

LOL

That's deflection, not an answer. Well, yeah, I guess it is an answer. The answer is you're full of shit. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

SniperFire

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reaction score
1,226
Points
48
Location
Inside Your Head
Okay then. Let's assume that Issa was trying to expose the President as a liar and a crook and not expose himself as an incompetent boob...

What did the document dump show that exposed the President as you claim?

If you feel that why, why are you melting down?


The truth shall set you free.

LOL

That's deflection, not an answer. Well, yeah, I guess it is an answer. The answer is you're full of shit. Thanks for clearing that up.

Well, right off the bat, it exposes the Vice President of the United States of America as a liar when he just claimed this to be an 'intelligence failure' and his jaw dropping lie that 'we didn't know they wanted more security there.'
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
69,598
Reaction score
16,022
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Desperate to regain ground on the Benghazi talking point after Obama smacked Romney down during their second debate, House Oversight Committee Chairman Joe McCarthy -- err, I mean Darrell Issa, posted pages of documents related to the attack without redacting sensitive information, such as the names of Libyans working with the US.

:clap2: Good job, Issa. All in the name of justice, right?

Benghazi Consulate Attack: Darrell Issa Releases Raw Libya Cables, Obama Administration Cries Foul

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R- Calif.) has come under fire after posting 166 pages of "sensitive but unclassified" State Department cables online Friday afternoon.

The documents relate to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and four others. Administration officials, speaking with Foreign Policy magazine, accused Issa of endangering the safety of Libyans working with the U.S. government, whose names were not redacted from the report:

Much like WikiLeaks, when you dump a bunch of documents into the ether, there are a lot of unintended consequences," an administration official told The Cable Friday afternoon. "This does damage to the individuals because they are named, danger to security cooperation because these are militias and groups that we work with and that is now well known, and danger to the investigation, because these people could help us down the road.

I'm sure you were just as upset when the New York Times released sensitive info, that endangered Americans, during the Bush administration.
 

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods
If you feel that why, why are you melting down?


The truth shall set you free.

LOL

That's deflection, not an answer. Well, yeah, I guess it is an answer. The answer is you're full of shit. Thanks for clearing that up.

Well, right off the bat, it exposes the Vice President of the United States of America as a liar when he just claimed this to be an 'intelligence failure' and his jaw dropping lie that 'we didn't know they wanted more security there.'

And you've proven neither so far...other than to simply claim it. Pardon me if I don't consider you a valid source. Prove that the weren't intelligence failures and prove that the President and VP knew that they had asked for more security.

I prefer to wait until all the facts are known. There should be an investigation of the security failures there and what led to them. I thought the same about 9/11.

What Issa does can't be called investigating.
 

OODA_Loop

Account Terminated
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,495
Reaction score
677
Points
175
Location
Lubyanka
State Department unclassified the documents w/ the names unredacted.
 

SniperFire

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reaction score
1,226
Points
48
Location
Inside Your Head
That's deflection, not an answer. Well, yeah, I guess it is an answer. The answer is you're full of shit. Thanks for clearing that up.

Well, right off the bat, it exposes the Vice President of the United States of America as a liar when he just claimed this to be an 'intelligence failure' and his jaw dropping lie that 'we didn't know they wanted more security there.'

And you've proven neither so far...other than to simply claim it. Pardon me if I don't consider you a valid source. Prove that the weren't intelligence failures and prove that the President and VP knew that they had asked for more security.

I prefer to wait until all the facts are known. There should be an investigation of the security failures there and what led to them. I thought the same about 9/11.

What Issa does can't be called investigating.



LOL


hate-thinking-vote-obama.jpg
 

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
42,150
Reaction score
7,576
Points
1,860
Location
Peaking out from the redwoods
Desperate to regain ground on the Benghazi talking point after Obama smacked Romney down during their second debate, House Oversight Committee Chairman Joe McCarthy -- err, I mean Darrell Issa, posted pages of documents related to the attack without redacting sensitive information, such as the names of Libyans working with the US.

:clap2: Good job, Issa. All in the name of justice, right?

Benghazi Consulate Attack: Darrell Issa Releases Raw Libya Cables, Obama Administration Cries Foul

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R- Calif.) has come under fire after posting 166 pages of "sensitive but unclassified" State Department cables online Friday afternoon.

The documents relate to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and four others. Administration officials, speaking with Foreign Policy magazine, accused Issa of endangering the safety of Libyans working with the U.S. government, whose names were not redacted from the report:

I'm sure you were just as upset when the New York Times released sensitive info, that endangered Americans, during the Bush administration.

Link? Was it given to them by a Congressman?
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
69,598
Reaction score
16,022
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Desperate to regain ground on the Benghazi talking point after Obama smacked Romney down during their second debate, House Oversight Committee Chairman Joe McCarthy -- err, I mean Darrell Issa, posted pages of documents related to the attack without redacting sensitive information, such as the names of Libyans working with the US.

:clap2: Good job, Issa. All in the name of justice, right?

I'm sure you were just as upset when the New York Times released sensitive info, that endangered Americans, during the Bush administration.

Link? Was it given to them by a Congressman?

The sensitive info published during the Bush administration was okay with you, if it wasn't leaked by a Congressman? Why does that make it better?
 

SniperFire

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reaction score
1,226
Points
48
Location
Inside Your Head
That's deflection, not an answer. Well, yeah, I guess it is an answer. The answer is you're full of shit. Thanks for clearing that up.

Well, right off the bat, it exposes the Vice President of the United States of America as a liar when he just claimed this to be an 'intelligence failure' and his jaw dropping lie that 'we didn't know they wanted more security there.'

And you've proven neither so far...other than to simply claim it. Pardon me if I don't consider you a valid source. Prove that the weren't intelligence failures and prove that the President and VP knew that they had asked for more security.

I prefer to wait until all the facts are known. There should be an investigation of the security failures there and what led to them. I thought the same about 9/11.

What Issa does can't be called investigating.


Here is the conversation in the debate:

'RADDATZ: And they wanted more security there.

BIDEN: Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again.'


Since security requests would of course not be made directly to the POTUS, it is clear that Biden was talking about his State Department.

And it is clear he is a lying hunk of shit.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$201.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top