Good News- Senate GOP Will Deny Obama Supreme Court Nominee Hearings

[eagle1462010]

Advise and Consent................The Consent is not given as Obama has proven a partisan hack...........Therefore he can't be trusted with another life long appointment.............

Advice...................use one of these.

332-206

So..................Checks and Balances............Senate must approve...........

To dang bad.........Your side has done the same.............So I could care less about your whining.

Please point to the time when the Democrats have ever refused to have hearings for a GOP nominee.

You won't.
You can't.

Back in those days the fillabuster was still used..........before a lot of it got Nuked by Reid..........Obama joined in one of those sessions..............

Pound sand.........

 

[eagle1462010]

Advise and Consent................The Consent is not given as Obama has proven a partisan hack...........Therefore he can't be trusted with another life long appointment.............

Advice...................use one of these.

332-206

So..................Checks and Balances............Senate must approve...........

To dang bad.........Your side has done the same.............So I could care less about your whining.

Please point to the time when the Democrats have ever refused to have hearings for a GOP nominee.

You won't.
You can't.

even the ah thomas had a hearing

Coining the phrase Uncle Tom..............finally beat the obstruction of the Dems.

 

[Geaux4it]

I supported the shut down and Cruz all nighter, and I support this.... and many of Trumps ideas, but can't vote for him.... yet....

-Geaux

Interesting....so you admit that the shutdown was on the GOP....they don't. They blame it on President Obama.

And who may 'they' be?

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

Thanks and hats off to the Senate

-Geaux
======================

In "Unprecedented, Historic" Move, Senate GOP Will Deny Obama Supreme Court Nominee Hearings | Zero Hedge

LETTER: 'this Committee will not hold hearings on any Supreme Court nominee' until 1/20/17

An excellent idea by the GOP Senators...and even better, their signatures on a hard document. Win!

Major win for Democrats... GOP have a constitutional duty to approve or deny... They are failing in their duty in an election year...

As an aside not Obama can also push for no Recesses for the rest of the year... This will hurt incumbents in an election year (most are GOP)...

So while not perfect, the GOP are going to pay for not having even a vote..

Demands to adhere to the Constitution strike hollow coming from the left. Obama has used it as a doormat for going on 8 years now. The Senate is serving the better good

-Geaux

 

[IcebergSlim]

Republicans Rocked As Polls Show 4 Senators Could Lose Seats Due To Obstructing Obama
Republicans Rocked As Polls Show 4 Senators Could Lose Seats Due To Obstructing Obama

Two new polls revealed that incumbent Republican senators in New Hampshire and Wisconsin have joined vulnerable GOP incumbents in Ohio and Pennsylvania, who could lose their seats because of the Republican decision to block Obama’s SCOTUS nominee....

Earlier this week, PPP polls of Pennsylvania and Ohio found that Republican incumbents Pat Toomey (PA) and Rob Portman (OH) are in jeopardy of losing their seats due to the due to the decision by Senate Majority Leaders Mitch McConnell to obstruct President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee.

Democrats need to capture five Republican seats to retake control of the Senate, and thanks to the Republican decision to obstruct and Obama’s nominee before he or she has been chosen, Democrats have the inside track on four seats. It might not matter who Republicans nominate for president.

The Senate is slipping away from Republicans because the bill for years of obstructing President Obama may be coming due this November.

Could call for some preemptive assumption of The Position..

What the labor participation rate? Is it still the lowest in 35 years?

Imagine what it would be had you not cast two votes enabling THIS:

Title: All Employees: Total Nonfarm Payrolls
Series ID: PAYEMS
Source: US. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Release: Employment Situation
Seasonal Adjustment: Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency: Monthly
Units: Thousands of Persons


2001-02-01 132777

2009-02-01 133350

 

[IcebergSlim]

Thanks and hats off to the Senate

-Geaux
======================

In "Unprecedented, Historic" Move, Senate GOP Will Deny Obama Supreme Court Nominee Hearings | Zero Hedge

LETTER: 'this Committee will not hold hearings on any Supreme Court nominee' until 1/20/17

Then we need to call upon the the minority members of the Judicial Committee to demand that their salaries be frozen and their health care benefits be withheld -- because that's what happens in the real world when you don't do your job.

In that case, Obama needs to be fired. That's what happens in the real world when you're the worst employee, ever.

Billy,

You wanna compare his performance to that of his predecessor?

Imagine if you went for your annual review and you could put up THIS:

All you had to do was add $14 Trillion in new debt. Your only job would be working for the government

Sure, Frank.......can you show me your math

 

[my2¢]

I hate to see the GOP already counting their chickens before they're hatched concerning the fall election. Hopefully this one doesn't come back to bite us in the butt.

 

[Pete7469]

G.W. Bush nominated 231 Federal Judges in his first term**, 205 were confirmed for a rate of 88.7%

Obama nominated 215 Federal Judges in his first term**, 173 were confirmed for a rate of 80.5%


https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43058.pdf

So the moonbat could only get %80 of his acolytes through a democrook controlled senate in his first 4 years while Bush managed to get %88 percent of his through while the republicrats only controlled the senate half the time?

The moonbat messiah's nominees must have been more insane than I thought.

 

[candycorn]

Advise and Consent................The Consent is not given as Obama has proven a partisan hack...........Therefore he can't be trusted with another life long appointment.............

Advice...................use one of these.

332-206

So..................Checks and Balances............Senate must approve...........

To dang bad.........Your side has done the same.............So I could care less about your whining.

Please point to the time when the Democrats have ever refused to have hearings for a GOP nominee.

You won't.
You can't.

Back in those days the fillabuster was still used..........before a lot of it got Nuked by Reid..........Obama joined in one of those sessions..............

Pound sand.........

Again, name the nominees who didn't get hearings...if you can't STFU

 

[candycorn]

Obama has beaten the shit out of the republicans so often that the conservatives no longer even engage him...republican voters have moved on to easier prey; the Republican party.

Slate has reported that the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee should hold hearings on whomever the President nominates.

You will recall, this is what they did with Sandra Fluke. It is unclear whether or not the GOP will call the nominee a slut or whore.

 

[WorldWatcher]

You will recall, this is what they did with Sandra Fluke. It is unclear whether or not the GOP will call the nominee a slut or whore.

It was Rush that used the degrading terms about women, not the GOP.

Please don't degrade us by trying to link an association.


Thank you.


WW


>>>>

 

[candycorn]

You will recall, this is what they did with Sandra Fluke. It is unclear whether or not the GOP will call the nominee a slut or whore.

It was Rush that used the degrading terms about women, not the GOP.

Please don't degrade us by trying to link an association.


Thank you.


WW


>>>>

Oh yeah and every republican alive besides Rush scrambled to Ms. Fluke's defense...oh wait. That didn't happen.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Oh yeah and every republican alive besides Rush scrambled to Ms. Fluke's defense...oh wait. That didn't happen.

I'm a Republican, I never called her that and chastised others who did.


>>>>

 

[candycorn]

Oh yeah and every republican alive besides Rush scrambled to Ms. Fluke's defense...oh wait. That didn't happen.

I'm a Republican, I never called her that and chastised others who did.


>>>>

Okay, tell us what you like about Sandra.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Okay, tell us what you like about Sandra.

Move the goal posts much?

I don't have to like her, but I don't think she was a slut and a whore.

Personally, the insurance program for faculty and staff covered contraceptives, I didn't see any reason not to include students who were using the University's Health Care Insurance.


>>>>