Insurrection is a term - look it up. Legally? seditious conspiracy is a charge
actually, nothing similar. Courts were involved. Both sides went into the courts -- not the same thing
www.npr.org
you do know there are tons of projects like that? It's not an outlierThe $3.6 million dollar outlay for a trail named for Michelle Obama is in the $1.7 trillion omnibus bill--an outlay when mega millions of Americans are reeling under crushing inflation, we're funding the lion's share of an expensive Ukranian war, thousands of illegals are crossing our southern border every day, when there are at least a half million homeless Americans.
Please tell me how that $3.6 million dollar outlay for a walking trail that will be used by a relative few is a responsible expenditure using tax payer money? Insuring election integrity and reassuring Americans that our elections are honest and reliable is a far more worthy expense.
'Michelle Obama Trail' $3.6m funding in omnibus bill sparks Republican fury
Some Republicans have publicly expressed their anger at a provision for a walking trail in Georgia named after the former first lady.www.newsweek.com
None of which happened on Jan 6th.
Stupid post ^^
dumb as fuck
Yes, your post was ‘dumb as fuck’ blithering idiot.
It is irresponsible spending when so much that needs to be done is ignored, damaging policy is encouraged, and critical needs that affect people's health, welfare, security go unfunded.
It's ok The GOP will hold it all hostage and cut spending even more
They wasted 3.6 million of Michelles useless trail!
See. I hope your psychiatric course goes well.
The insurrectionists have been, and are still being arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced
Nor did his report confirm Trump committed any "crimes".Except: "
"Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump"
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump with a crime was "not an option" because of federal rules, but he used his first public remarks on the Russia investigation to emphasize that he did not exonerate the president.apnews.com
Someone needs to cut spending and reduce deficits.
so some how the republicans have gotten legal recounts this time without going to court or using the LEGAL system? Is that your claim?actually, nothing similar. Courts were involved. Both sides went into the courts -- not the same thing
The Florida Recount Of 2000: A Nightmare That Goes On Haunting
The weeks-long battle over "hanging chads" that ultimately landed the fate of the presidency in the U.S. Supreme Court, continues to cast a long shadow over the nation's political psyche.
And Al Gore accepted the court's rulings and with class, allowed the transition of power to go smoothly. No one attacked the Capitol but we did have GOP dirty tricksters like Stone The insurrection on Capitol Hill directly descends from the legacy of the Brooks Brothers riot and Bush v. Gore
If certain of you people would just do the right thing and drop dead, the complaints and constant whining could cease and America could get back to business
Nor did his report confirm Trump committed any "crimes".
'''
On March 22, 2019, Mueller concluded his investigation and submitted the special counsel's final report to Attorney General William Barr.[107] A senior Department of Justice official said that the report did not recommend any new indictments.[7] On March 24, Attorney General Barr submitted a summary of findings to the United States Congress. He stated in his letter, "The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russian in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election." Mueller's report also reportedly did not take a stance on whether or not Trump committed obstruction of justice; Barr quoted Mueller as saying "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."[108]
...
Robert Mueller - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Basically Mueller et al couldn't find one way or another. Underscores the kangaroo court the whole fraud and sham investigation was.
I suggest you look harder to see where you lost your brain.
Robert Mueller
Letter from Robert Mueller III to William P. Barr objecting to Barr's characterization of the conclusions of the Mueller Report
On March 25, a day after the Barr letter was released, Robert Mueller himself reportedly wrote a letter to Barr, as described in the New York Times as "expressing his and his team's concerns that the attorney general had inadequately portrayed their conclusions".[43] In USA Today it was described that Mueller "expressed his differences with Barr".[44]
On March 27, Mueller sent Barr another letter describing his concerns of Barr's letter to Congress and the public on March 24. Mueller thought that Barr's letter "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the findings. "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations." Mueller also requested Barr release the Mueller Report's introductions and executive summaries. This was first reported on April 30, 2019.[45][46][47]
Letter from Attorney General William P. Barr on March 29 to the chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees
The next day on March 28, Mueller had a phone conversation with Barr and reportedly expressed concerns about public misunderstandings of the obstruction investigation due to a lack of context released by Barr's letter. In their phone conversation, Barr reportedly said that his letter was not intended to be a summary, but rather only as a description of the principal findings of Mueller's report, and said he preferred not to release more information until a more complete redacted version of the report could be prepared. Barr then sent a subsequent letter to Congress in which he reiterated that his letter had not been intended as a summary of the Mueller Report and volunteered to testify before Congress in early May.[46]
