Vast majority of 16,000 canceled mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania were from registered Democrats

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 2, 2017
15,737
8,834
1,280
Twin Falls Idaho
It's so odd..that all the egregious election mishaps..the absolutely provable ones...seem to have affected Democrats votes the most?
Here we have 16,000 voters disenfranchised..and the majority/ Democrat. The means...Republican led efforts aimed at voter-suppression.
The fun fact is that the election-deniers will try to somehow spin this...as proof there must be oh so many more of these mistakes..but since they're Republican votes..they got covered up.
See how that works?


New data from Pennsylvania’s elections agency shows an early November state court decision that barred mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on their exterior envelopes resulted in otherwise valid votes being thrown out.
The Department of State said this week more than 16,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified by county officials because they lacked secrecy envelopes or proper signatures or dates. Democratic voters, who are much more likely to vote by mail, made up more than two-thirds of the total canceled ballots.
The agency said 8,250 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were rejected because they were sent in without being contained within a secrecy envelope, making it impossible for them to be tabulated without putting voter privacy at risk.
The remaining 7,904 invalidated ballots were tossed out because the exterior envelopes used to send in those ballots did not have the voters’ signatures, or because those exterior envelopes were either undated or improperly dated.
Many counties, but not all, worked with voters to “cure” undated ballots. Those fixed ballots were counted and are not among the number of rejected ballots now being reported by the Department of State.
Some people whose mail-in ballots were thrown out in the high-stakes November election may not be aware that happened.
“In many counties, voters who provide their email address when applying for a mail ballot automatically receive email notifications with status updates on their ballot, including whether their ballot was canceled,” Department of State spokesperson Ellen Lyon said in an email. “There is no similar automatic notification system for voters who do not provide an email address when applying for a mail ballot.”
Pennsylvania Democrats flipped Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey’s seat this fall, elected Attorney General Josh Shapiro as governor and won just enough state House races to retake majority control by one vote.
But the Democrats’ much greater use of mail-in voting also meant they saw far more of their votes disqualified than did Republicans, independents and third party voters combined. Democrats had 10,920 votes thrown out, about half for lacking secrecy envelopes. Republicans saw 3,503 ballots forfeited. Independents and third parties amounted to 1,731 votes that did not count in the fall election.
Negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican legislative leaders about ending the exterior envelope date requirement failed because the sides could not reach agreement on a wider bill to address a host of election procedures and policy changes. The exterior envelope dates are not needed to ensure ballots arrive in time — that occurs when they are received and clocked in by county elections workers.
Republican lawmakers have defended the need for the requirements, saying they are important for security and secrecy.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the dates were not required — calling them “immaterial” — but the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled that decision moot.

Other federal litigation against the secretary of state and county elections boards over the inaccurate or missing envelope dates remains pending. It claims enforcing the date requirement has a larger impact on voters who are “significantly older than both other Pennsylvanians who voted by mail and all registered Pennsylvania voters.”
 
It's so odd..that all the egregious election mishaps..the absolutely provable ones...seem to have affected Democrats votes the most?
Here we have 16,000 voters disenfranchised..and the majority/ Democrat. The means...Republican led efforts aimed at voter-suppression.
The fun fact is that the election-deniers will try to somehow spin this...as proof there must be oh so many more of these mistakes..but since they're Republican votes..they got covered up.
See how that works?


New data from Pennsylvania’s elections agency shows an early November state court decision that barred mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on their exterior envelopes resulted in otherwise valid votes being thrown out.
The Department of State said this week more than 16,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified by county officials because they lacked secrecy envelopes or proper signatures or dates. Democratic voters, who are much more likely to vote by mail, made up more than two-thirds of the total canceled ballots.
The agency said 8,250 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were rejected because they were sent in without being contained within a secrecy envelope, making it impossible for them to be tabulated without putting voter privacy at risk.
The remaining 7,904 invalidated ballots were tossed out because the exterior envelopes used to send in those ballots did not have the voters’ signatures, or because those exterior envelopes were either undated or improperly dated.
Many counties, but not all, worked with voters to “cure” undated ballots. Those fixed ballots were counted and are not among the number of rejected ballots now being reported by the Department of State.
Some people whose mail-in ballots were thrown out in the high-stakes November election may not be aware that happened.
“In many counties, voters who provide their email address when applying for a mail ballot automatically receive email notifications with status updates on their ballot, including whether their ballot was canceled,” Department of State spokesperson Ellen Lyon said in an email. “There is no similar automatic notification system for voters who do not provide an email address when applying for a mail ballot.”
Pennsylvania Democrats flipped Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey’s seat this fall, elected Attorney General Josh Shapiro as governor and won just enough state House races to retake majority control by one vote.
But the Democrats’ much greater use of mail-in voting also meant they saw far more of their votes disqualified than did Republicans, independents and third party voters combined. Democrats had 10,920 votes thrown out, about half for lacking secrecy envelopes. Republicans saw 3,503 ballots forfeited. Independents and third parties amounted to 1,731 votes that did not count in the fall election.
Negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican legislative leaders about ending the exterior envelope date requirement failed because the sides could not reach agreement on a wider bill to address a host of election procedures and policy changes. The exterior envelope dates are not needed to ensure ballots arrive in time — that occurs when they are received and clocked in by county elections workers.
Republican lawmakers have defended the need for the requirements, saying they are important for security and secrecy.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the dates were not required — calling them “immaterial” — but the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled that decision moot.

Other federal litigation against the secretary of state and county elections boards over the inaccurate or missing envelope dates remains pending. It claims enforcing the date requirement has a larger impact on voters who are “significantly older than both other Pennsylvanians who voted by mail and all registered Pennsylvania voters.”
That just proves that Democrats are too stupid to follow simple mail-in ballot instructions.
 
It's so odd..that all the egregious election mishaps..the absolutely provable ones...seem to have affected Democrats votes the most?
Here we have 16,000 voters disenfranchised..and the majority/ Democrat. The means...Republican led efforts aimed at voter-suppression.
The fun fact is that the election-deniers will try to somehow spin this...as proof there must be oh so many more of these mistakes..but since they're Republican votes..they got covered up.
See how that works?


New data from Pennsylvania’s elections agency shows an early November state court decision that barred mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on their exterior envelopes resulted in otherwise valid votes being thrown out.
The Department of State said this week more than 16,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified by county officials because they lacked secrecy envelopes or proper signatures or dates. Democratic voters, who are much more likely to vote by mail, made up more than two-thirds of the total canceled ballots.
The agency said 8,250 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were rejected because they were sent in without being contained within a secrecy envelope, making it impossible for them to be tabulated without putting voter privacy at risk.
The remaining 7,904 invalidated ballots were tossed out because the exterior envelopes used to send in those ballots did not have the voters’ signatures, or because those exterior envelopes were either undated or improperly dated.
Many counties, but not all, worked with voters to “cure” undated ballots. Those fixed ballots were counted and are not among the number of rejected ballots now being reported by the Department of State.
Some people whose mail-in ballots were thrown out in the high-stakes November election may not be aware that happened.
“In many counties, voters who provide their email address when applying for a mail ballot automatically receive email notifications with status updates on their ballot, including whether their ballot was canceled,” Department of State spokesperson Ellen Lyon said in an email. “There is no similar automatic notification system for voters who do not provide an email address when applying for a mail ballot.”
Pennsylvania Democrats flipped Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey’s seat this fall, elected Attorney General Josh Shapiro as governor and won just enough state House races to retake majority control by one vote.
But the Democrats’ much greater use of mail-in voting also meant they saw far more of their votes disqualified than did Republicans, independents and third party voters combined. Democrats had 10,920 votes thrown out, about half for lacking secrecy envelopes. Republicans saw 3,503 ballots forfeited. Independents and third parties amounted to 1,731 votes that did not count in the fall election.
Negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican legislative leaders about ending the exterior envelope date requirement failed because the sides could not reach agreement on a wider bill to address a host of election procedures and policy changes. The exterior envelope dates are not needed to ensure ballots arrive in time — that occurs when they are received and clocked in by county elections workers.
Republican lawmakers have defended the need for the requirements, saying they are important for security and secrecy.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the dates were not required — calling them “immaterial” — but the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled that decision moot.

Other federal litigation against the secretary of state and county elections boards over the inaccurate or missing envelope dates remains pending. It claims enforcing the date requirement has a larger impact on voters who are “significantly older than both other Pennsylvanians who voted by mail and all registered Pennsylvania voters.”
.






And you are well known for reporting news with a good bit of inaccuracy thrown in there, and favoring outlets that do the same.










but thanks for your great post
 
(A) It's not surprising that the "incompetent" votes are majority Democrat. That party actively, aggressively seeks the votes of people who are uninformed, disengaged, easily influenced and...incompetent. This is why the "easier" you make voting, the more Democrat votes appear.

(B). The Democrats created tens of thousands of votes in Pennsylvania - mainly in the Philadelphia region - dwarfing the number of these 16 thousand discarded ballots.

The election was "stolen," not by fraud, per se, but by seeking out the votes of those who normally would not vote due to indifference and incompetence. THESE are the backbone of the Democrat party. And this is why the FIRST thing the Pelosi Congress did when it was seated in 2021 was to try to make the bullshit Pandemic-related rules of 2020 PERMANENT and UNIVERSAL - which of course would have been unconstitutional, but that never stands in the way of Leftists.
 
.






And you are well known for reporting news with a good bit of inaccuracy thrown in there, and favoring outlets that do the same.










but thanks for your great post
I note that you are not pointing out any inaccuracy---and if you are referring to my habit of using vetted and reliable news outlets..always cross-checking first--Guilty~
 
I note that you are not pointing out any inaccuracy---and if you are referring to my habit of using vetted and reliable news outlets..always cross-checking first--Guilty~
.



Where did she say "Q" in either of those videos?

Time stamp.

Otherwise, just more demonicrat lies.

I do not expect anything better out of your cult.





.
 
It's so odd..that all the egregious election mishaps..the absolutely provable ones...seem to have affected Democrats votes the most?
Here we have 16,000 voters disenfranchised..and the majority/ Democrat. The means...Republican led efforts aimed at voter-suppression.
The fun fact is that the election-deniers will try to somehow spin this...as proof there must be oh so many more of these mistakes..but since they're Republican votes..they got covered up.
See how that works?


New data from Pennsylvania’s elections agency shows an early November state court decision that barred mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on their exterior envelopes resulted in otherwise valid votes being thrown out.
The Department of State said this week more than 16,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified by county officials because they lacked secrecy envelopes or proper signatures or dates. Democratic voters, who are much more likely to vote by mail, made up more than two-thirds of the total canceled ballots.
The agency said 8,250 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were rejected because they were sent in without being contained within a secrecy envelope, making it impossible for them to be tabulated without putting voter privacy at risk.
The remaining 7,904 invalidated ballots were tossed out because the exterior envelopes used to send in those ballots did not have the voters’ signatures, or because those exterior envelopes were either undated or improperly dated.
Many counties, but not all, worked with voters to “cure” undated ballots. Those fixed ballots were counted and are not among the number of rejected ballots now being reported by the Department of State.
Some people whose mail-in ballots were thrown out in the high-stakes November election may not be aware that happened.
“In many counties, voters who provide their email address when applying for a mail ballot automatically receive email notifications with status updates on their ballot, including whether their ballot was canceled,” Department of State spokesperson Ellen Lyon said in an email. “There is no similar automatic notification system for voters who do not provide an email address when applying for a mail ballot.”
Pennsylvania Democrats flipped Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey’s seat this fall, elected Attorney General Josh Shapiro as governor and won just enough state House races to retake majority control by one vote.
But the Democrats’ much greater use of mail-in voting also meant they saw far more of their votes disqualified than did Republicans, independents and third party voters combined. Democrats had 10,920 votes thrown out, about half for lacking secrecy envelopes. Republicans saw 3,503 ballots forfeited. Independents and third parties amounted to 1,731 votes that did not count in the fall election.
Negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican legislative leaders about ending the exterior envelope date requirement failed because the sides could not reach agreement on a wider bill to address a host of election procedures and policy changes. The exterior envelope dates are not needed to ensure ballots arrive in time — that occurs when they are received and clocked in by county elections workers.
Republican lawmakers have defended the need for the requirements, saying they are important for security and secrecy.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the dates were not required — calling them “immaterial” — but the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled that decision moot.

Other federal litigation against the secretary of state and county elections boards over the inaccurate or missing envelope dates remains pending. It claims enforcing the date requirement has a larger impact on voters who are “significantly older than both other Pennsylvanians who voted by mail and all registered Pennsylvania voters.”
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, I thought democrats want their votes to count. Guess they should have voted in person.
 
It's so odd..that all the egregious election mishaps..the absolutely provable ones...seem to have affected Democrats votes the most?
Here we have 16,000 voters disenfranchised..and the majority/ Democrat. The means...Republican led efforts aimed at voter-suppression.
The fun fact is that the election-deniers will try to somehow spin this...as proof there must be oh so many more of these mistakes..but since they're Republican votes..they got covered up.
See how that works?


New data from Pennsylvania’s elections agency shows an early November state court decision that barred mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on their exterior envelopes resulted in otherwise valid votes being thrown out.
The Department of State said this week more than 16,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified by county officials because they lacked secrecy envelopes or proper signatures or dates. Democratic voters, who are much more likely to vote by mail, made up more than two-thirds of the total canceled ballots.
The agency said 8,250 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were rejected because they were sent in without being contained within a secrecy envelope, making it impossible for them to be tabulated without putting voter privacy at risk.
The remaining 7,904 invalidated ballots were tossed out because the exterior envelopes used to send in those ballots did not have the voters’ signatures, or because those exterior envelopes were either undated or improperly dated.
Many counties, but not all, worked with voters to “cure” undated ballots. Those fixed ballots were counted and are not among the number of rejected ballots now being reported by the Department of State.
Some people whose mail-in ballots were thrown out in the high-stakes November election may not be aware that happened.
“In many counties, voters who provide their email address when applying for a mail ballot automatically receive email notifications with status updates on their ballot, including whether their ballot was canceled,” Department of State spokesperson Ellen Lyon said in an email. “There is no similar automatic notification system for voters who do not provide an email address when applying for a mail ballot.”
Pennsylvania Democrats flipped Republican U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey’s seat this fall, elected Attorney General Josh Shapiro as governor and won just enough state House races to retake majority control by one vote.
But the Democrats’ much greater use of mail-in voting also meant they saw far more of their votes disqualified than did Republicans, independents and third party voters combined. Democrats had 10,920 votes thrown out, about half for lacking secrecy envelopes. Republicans saw 3,503 ballots forfeited. Independents and third parties amounted to 1,731 votes that did not count in the fall election.
Negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican legislative leaders about ending the exterior envelope date requirement failed because the sides could not reach agreement on a wider bill to address a host of election procedures and policy changes. The exterior envelope dates are not needed to ensure ballots arrive in time — that occurs when they are received and clocked in by county elections workers.
Republican lawmakers have defended the need for the requirements, saying they are important for security and secrecy.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in May that the dates were not required — calling them “immaterial” — but the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled that decision moot.

Other federal litigation against the secretary of state and county elections boards over the inaccurate or missing envelope dates remains pending. It claims enforcing the date requirement has a larger impact on voters who are “significantly older than both other Pennsylvanians who voted by mail and all registered Pennsylvania voters.”
Back when voting on election day was the only way to vote, the claim was that "there has never been proof of a case of voter fraud anywhere", now it seems someone has instituted a system that is absolutely corrupt.

Every honest person should be demanding we go back to a more honest system, or we should expect and will deserve more of the above.
 
Back when voting on election day was the only way to vote, the claim was that "there has never been proof of a case of voter fraud anywhere", now it seems someone has instituted a system that is absolutely corrupt.

Every honest person should be demanding we go back to a more honest system, or we should expect and will deserve more of the above.
Their is no more honest system.

Trump and Fox news lies broke it for money.

I don't think it can be fixed.
 
Their is no more honest system.
What about the one where "no evidence of voter fraud has ever been proven".
Trump and Fox news lies broke it for money.

I don't think it can be fixed.
Perhaps but the OP says this system is now corrupt...can't take it seriously if there is no outcry to change it from those who are making that claim.
 
What about the one where "no evidence of voter fraud has ever been proven".

Perhaps but the OP says this system is now corrupt...can't take it seriously if there is no outcry to change it from those who are making that claim.
The system isn't perfect but I have seen no proof it's corrupt to any appreciable level. Like I said, it makes no difference. Trump's lies have crippled our democracy/constitutional Republic for decades.
 
Most democrat voters have no clue they voted. Their ballots get harvested.

This is why democrats don't campaign. The only support they look for is the support of the globalist running vote harvesting operations, and that's who they serve.
 
Then you should be posting this to the OP.

then what is the point of the OP?
I was responding to your post where you said we need a more honest system.

I am simply pointing out that a more honest system is pointless at this point.

Did you have any ideas on how to make it a more honest system?
 
I was responding to your post where you said we need a more honest system.
And that was in reference to the OP which you then claimed:
The system isn't perfect but I have seen no proof it's corrupt to any appreciable level.
and that claim would better serve the OP than it would/does me
I am simply pointing out that a more honest system is pointless at this point.
then you should be making this clear to the OP not me...and if that were really true then the OP has no point.
Did you have any ideas on how to make it a more honest system?
Yes, go back to the system where "no evidence of voter fraud has ever been proven".
The system isn't perfect but I have seen no proof it's corrupt to any appreciable level.
Which system? the one the OP is referring to? if so then why did you not bring this to his/her/they attention? If not, it had to be the system I referenced which means you agree it is a more honest system rendering your post moot.
 
The Democrats stole the 2020 Presidential election by using the Pandemic as a cover to create fraudulent mail in and harvested ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts.

This who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.

The Moon Bats don't want to hear the truth.
 
And that was in reference to the OP which you then claimed:

and that claim would better serve the OP than it would/does me

then you should be making this clear to the OP not me...and if that were really true then the OP has no point.

Yes, go back to the system where "no evidence of voter fraud has ever been proven".

Which system? the one the OP is referring to? if so then why did you not bring this to his/her/they attention? If not, it had to be the system I referenced which means you agree it is a more honest system rendering your post moot.
You posted. I responded to your post.

If you don't want to respond then don't. Not sure what all the babbling is about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top