Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're uninformed or a liar. Queers are suing people who own businesses for not bending to their demands on same-sex marriage.
False analogy logical fallacy. Murder harms others and it is pretty much a universal taboo. Either you know that and your just trolling or you are really that stupidIf two adults decide to murder someone would that be immoral? Marriage laws are a states issue.
False narrative. No one is being sued for refusing to serve queers. Businesses are sued for refusing to believe in same-sex marriage. Try again.That is not suing someone because they don't like you.
That is suing a business for not serving everyone. We settled this in the 1960s. You can't refuse to serve blacks anymore. You can't refuse to serve women anymore. And you can't, as a business, refuse to serve gays anymore. In other words, you are not allowed to discriminate.
False narrative. No one is being sued for refusing to serve queers. Businesses are sued for refusing to believe in same-sex marriage. Try again.
Same-sex marriage has harmed many people who get sued because of religious beliefs. Marriage laws have always been a states issue. The Supreme Court will eventually reverse this just like Iike Roe v Wade.False analogy logical fallacy. Murder harms others and it is pretty much a universal taboo. Either you know that and your just trolling or you are really that stupid
As far as it being a state issue goes, states must abide by the US constitution in creating and administering their laws.
Freedom of religion. You can't force a business owner to violate their First Amendment rights.Bullshit. Not believing is not a violation of laws for businesses. Discrimination is.
Immorality harms all of us. The AIDS epidemic cost taxpayers billions.Marriage is not murder. If two adults decide to marry, no one is harmed. It is not a crime.
Freedom of religion. You can't force a business owner to violate their First Amendment rights.
Immorality harms all of us. The AIDS epidemic cost taxpayers billions.
If you reread my post, I said doing unnatural sexual acts leads to disaster, whether it be gay sex or illicit sex by unmarrieds. I didn't tie it to gay marriage. You did.Intelligent people understand that this thread is about the continued opposition to same sex marriage and the myriad of ways that the GOP is trying to undermine gay rights.
If you are trying to make a case against gay marriage by citing AIDS, it is a desperate use of a logical fallacy, specifically a false cause fallacy, not to mention just plain stupid. People are going to have sex as they please with or without marriage. I will also point out that heterosexuals also engage in some of those same sexual practices
Gay sexual relationships were not afforded legitimacy, nor should they be. They are immoral. Gays have more sex partners than heteros, with or without gay 'marriage'.Intelligent people understand that the AIDS epidemic sprung from a time when gay men were marginalized had few options other than having anonymous sex in bath houses and dark theaters. Their relationships were not afforded any legitimacy and therefore unstable and ripe for promiscuity. Now, it has been found that gay men who are married or otherwise in a committed relationship are far less likely to transmit diseases.
Gays can already fully participate in society. They want extra immoral "rights".Intelligent people understand that anyone who expresses concern about AIDS but does not support laws and policies that allow gays to fully participate in society by the light of day are hypocrites and just plain full of shit
I didn't make that call. It was made millennia ago by God.You do not get to decide the morality of what consenting adults do or who they marry
Wow. Going back 1000 years to find your latest non-sequitur.And the Inquisition is a great example of a loving church.
I agree. The badly-decided Obergefell will fall just like Roe v Wade did. Even liberal John Roberts dissented.Same-sex marriage has harmed many people who get sued because of religious beliefs. Marriage laws have always been a states issue. The Supreme Court will eventually reverse this just like Iike Roe v Wade.
Wow. Going back 1000 years to find your latest non-sequitur.
Illicit sex (any act outside hetero marriage) harms all of society.False analogy logical fallacy. Murder harms others and it is pretty much a universal taboo. Either you know that and your just trolling or you are really that stupid
As far as it being a state issue goes, states must abide by the US constitution in creating and administering their laws.
It was Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve.
Illicit sex (any act outside hetero marriage) harms all of society.
And another non-sequitur. What does that have to do with the RCC?Ok, more recently, until 1967, an interracial couple could be jailed for who they love.
Sorry, the Supreme Court has already determined that a person has a religious right to refuse based on the First Amendment.Their business is not a religion.
People have tried to claim their religion is against integration as well. Didn't work.
