Godless Ethics Panel Says it's "Ethical" to Create Babies with Three Parents

Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.
 
Wasn't it messing around with dna that produced this mosquito that's now causing a firestorm of disease?
No. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Again, where's your link?

:lol:

Where's his link?

Why is it my responsibility to prove him wrong?

You have no responsibility to do anything, but if you don't provide a link, I will not put any credit in anything you say.

:lol:

Oh no! Some clown on the internet doesn't think I'm "credible"! Whatever will I do?

I wonder why you haven't asked "the human being" for a link to back up his claims...
OK, that's fair. Continue to not provide links and I will continue to point out that you spout off without providing links.
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.
OK, well please direct me to the statues and memorials of Adolph Hitler and Dr. Joseph Mengele.
 
Babies With Genes From 3 People Could Be Ethical, Panel Says

Good to see that scientists are making sure it's "ethical" to perform genetic experiments on human life to create bizarre lifeforms with genes from three parents.

I mean, these scientists would have halted their research and destroyed all their notes if it turned out they were doing something "unethical" right?

Or maybe it's all a sham to have some phony "ethics panel" approve whatever Frankenstein experiments scientists want to do.

Yes, I think that's it. It's a sham.
Here's a radical idea: you and other social conservatives allow medical professionals to determine what is or is not ethical for other medical professionals, allow private citizens to decide what is or is not appropriate for them, and mind your own business for a change.
 
Wasn't it messing around with dna that produced this mosquito that's now causing a firestorm of disease?

No. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Again, where's your link?

:lol:

Where's his link?

Why is it my responsibility to prove him wrong?

You have no responsibility to do anything, but if you don't provide a link, I will not put any credit in anything you say.

:lol:

Oh no! Some clown on the internet doesn't think I'm "credible"! Whatever will I do?

I wonder why you haven't asked "the human being" for a link to back up his claims...

Well, again dipshit, the Human being didn't say a word about something on the internet. That was you.
 
Babies With Genes From 3 People Could Be Ethical, Panel Says

Good to see that scientists are making sure it's "ethical" to perform genetic experiments on human life to create bizarre lifeforms with genes from three parents.

I mean, these scientists would have halted their research and destroyed all their notes if it turned out they were doing something "unethical" right?

Or maybe it's all a sham to have some phony "ethics panel" approve whatever Frankenstein experiments scientists want to do.

Yes, I think that's it. It's a sham.
Here's a radical idea: you and other social conservatives allow medical professionals to determine what is or is not ethical for other medical professionals, allow private citizens to decide what is or is not appropriate for them, and mind your own business for a change.

Don't place a lot of credibility with medical professionals. They kill off a lot of people each year.
 
No. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Again, where's your link?

:lol:

Where's his link?

Why is it my responsibility to prove him wrong?

You have no responsibility to do anything, but if you don't provide a link, I will not put any credit in anything you say.

:lol:

Oh no! Some clown on the internet doesn't think I'm "credible"! Whatever will I do?

I wonder why you haven't asked "the human being" for a link to back up his claims...

Well, again dipshit, the Human being didn't say a word about something on the internet. That was you.

Really?

So then where did you hear that "genetically modified mosquitoes" are causing the Zika outbreak?
 
Babies With Genes From 3 People Could Be Ethical, Panel Says

Good to see that scientists are making sure it's "ethical" to perform genetic experiments on human life to create bizarre lifeforms with genes from three parents.

I mean, these scientists would have halted their research and destroyed all their notes if it turned out they were doing something "unethical" right?

Or maybe it's all a sham to have some phony "ethics panel" approve whatever Frankenstein experiments scientists want to do.

Yes, I think that's it. It's a sham.
Here's a radical idea: you and other social conservatives allow medical professionals to determine what is or is not ethical for other medical professionals, allow private citizens to decide what is or is not appropriate for them, and mind your own business for a change.
It is everyone's business, because these scientists' genetic experiments have already escaped the lab and caused damage -- like the Africanized honey bee.

Killer Bees - Africanized Honey Bees - DesertUSA
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.
OK, well please direct me to the statues and memorials of Adolph Hitler and Dr. Joseph Mengele.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy – it's as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

It's this sort of idiotic demagoguery that renders the social right the bane of the American Nation.
 
It's interesting that liberals are now openly coming out in favor of eugenics, and experimentation with human life.

We beat the eugenicists in World War II, and turned their cities into rubble, but now they have returned.
 
It's interesting that liberals are now openly coming out in favor of eugenics, and experimentation with human life.

We beat the eugenicists in World War II, and turned their cities into rubble, but now they have returned.
what are blue bloods?
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.
OK, well please direct me to the statues and memorials of Adolph Hitler and Dr. Joseph Mengele.
This fails as a false comparison fallacy – it's as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

It's this sort of idiotic demagoguery that renders the social right the bane of the American Nation.
Blah blah blah.
 
As far as medical ethics goes: I once underwent coronary bypass surgery. Everything went fine I thought. Following the operation. I was moved from Intensive care to regular care. The first evening in regular care, I got to sweating and hurting and sick on my tummy. I called for the nurse. The nurse informed me that she was about to get off her shift and I would have to wait until she was relieved before someone could check on me. I got real bad in the meantime. When someone finally came, he took my vitals and called my doctor. They transferred me back to intensive care. Three days later I was told I had had another heart attack.

Two years after that, my family doctor had an Xray done of my tummy. He called me at my home and told me to contact my cardiologist. My cardiologist told me to come to his office. He then informed me that I had a blood clot on my heart that they had been watching for two years that came from the bypass operation. I still have that blood clot.

How's that for medical ethics?
 
Babies With Genes From 3 People Could Be Ethical, Panel Says

Good to see that scientists are making sure it's "ethical" to perform genetic experiments on human life to create bizarre lifeforms with genes from three parents.

I mean, these scientists would have halted their research and destroyed all their notes if it turned out they were doing something "unethical" right?

Or maybe it's all a sham to have some phony "ethics panel" approve whatever Frankenstein experiments scientists want to do.

Yes, I think that's it. It's a sham.
Here's a radical idea: you and other social conservatives allow medical professionals to determine what is or is not ethical for other medical professionals, allow private citizens to decide what is or is not appropriate for them, and mind your own business for a change.
It is everyone's business, because these scientists' genetic experiments have already escaped the lab and caused damage -- like the Africanized honey bee.

Killer Bees - Africanized Honey Bees - DesertUSA

I didn't. They are carrying the disease as I understand it. They were created to kill off a certain mosquito. I would imagine though that all mosquitos carry the disease.
 
It's interesting that liberals are now openly coming out in favor of eugenics, and experimentation with human life.

We beat the eugenicists in World War II, and turned their cities into rubble, but now they have returned.

Lucy is the only one here in favor of eugenics, and she's not "liberal" in any way.
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.

Easier just to create robots.
 
It's interesting that liberals are now openly coming out in favor of eugenics, and experimentation with human life.

We beat the eugenicists in World War II, and turned their cities into rubble, but now they have returned.

Well, after all, the Liberals are Nazi Socialists.
 
Lucy, you have to kill and sterilize innocent human beings in order to create a world of genetically perfect human beings.

Are you prepared to do that?

To save world to create world with perfect beings, 100% healthy and vital, it's worth it and future generations years from now would built monuments and statues in our honour.

Easier just to create robots.

No, it wouldn't be the same, playing tennis and drinking bier with a robot, also we must breed, for that man and woman.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top