[
"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?
Agenda driven fake news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?
Of course he cheers for the punk ass bullies....I'm sure he was one. What am I saying? He still is one.The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.
#SMHGOP
Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
[
"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?
Agenda driven fake news.
maybe
Is this an allusion to Covington high school?
Wait, spent 30 years hearing Progressives liked Tariffs which unseated the free market. Aren't the tariff lovers in power now?Those kids were done wrong. The Progressive Socialist shill press made sure of it. One day, may those bastards get it back.The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.
#SMHGOP
Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
^ liberals love fake news.
Washington Post is going to lose. The agenda driven Liberal mainstream media can get away with lying about public figures like President Trump, but they absolutely stepped on their collective cranks blatantly lying about a private citizen...even worse, a private citizen who is a minor.
But the libs are pissed because this is going to unconditionally prove Trump correct. Don't see anyone above debating the merits...just baselezsly and blindly lashing out.
They have a bright future ahead, as they are proving themselves well qualified as potential modern "journalist" themselves.
Watch what a centerist liberal has to say:
If Republicans didn't lie. they'd have NOTHING to say.The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.
Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.
Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.
Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
[
"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?
Agenda driven fake news.
Link to that?
I'm quite sure more of these kinds of pictures and evidence is going to come out.....WaPo has the investigative reporters to really go to town about these punks.
Is this an allusion to Covington high school?
[
"Prove Rump correct" about -------------------------------- what?
Agenda driven fake news.
Link to that?
The fake news:
LIST: 24 Pieces of MSM Fake News in 5 Days
The agenda driven media:
(For some reason I can't upload the image, but it is at the link below)
STUDY: 91% of recent network Trump coverage is negative - Washington Post
I wonder why tiny donnie was never sued for this:Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
And the WaPo didn't "comment" on it anyway. They simply reported what witnesses said about the event.
That's what the suit's exhibits all point to --- QUOTES from people who were there describing what they saw.
Last summer Sean Spicer's attorney tried to make grunting noises about the same thing, threatening to "sue" the Associated Press for passing on a story (not even their original story) about a heckler who came into a Spicer book signing and accused him of racism. Which is also a fact, it happened and it's fully on video. Spicer's attack dog started spewing about how he was going to "sue" AP for passing that on. Needles to say, he never did. Because he can't.
These fascist assholes can whine and stomp their feet all they like but you can't just "sue" people for accurately reporting what someone said. Period.
Wanna bet?Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
I too want to see whitehall's evidence and how "just about" fits in legally.The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.
Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.
Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.
Nick and his RW CatholicThose kids were done wrong. The Progressive Socialist shill press made sure of it. One day, may those bastards get it back.The current POTUS is such a petulant and feckless child. No wonder the Republicans can't get enough of him.
#SMHGOP
Nick's parents want to stay in the news and get a payout.maybe Trump will give the kid some pointers on how to lose lawsuits.
'Go get them Nick': Trump cheers on Kentucky student suing the Washington Post for $250 million
I too want to see whitehall's evidence and how "just about" fits in legally.The Washington Post just about called an innocent high school kid a bigot and a racist and the crazy angry left blames Trump? Get a freaking life.
Again ---- and this invitation has been out there a full MONTH now ---- by all means show the class where the WaPo "just about" did that. Any time, in any article. At all.
Oh and then you can instruct the jury on the legal meaning of "just about".
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand GO.
I wonder why tiny donnie was never sued for this: View attachment 246882Commenting on a video is not libel or defamation. Or else people would be getting sued and losing left and right. Especially your hero dotard.Trump's retarded and has nothing to do with the case.
I'll assume this comment if directed at the OP.
I suspect it will be immediately dismissed. Just because some inbred kid from Buttfuck, Nowhere is sad he was caught on video doesn't mean the 1st Amendment ceases existing.
The First Amendment doesn't protect libel and defamation.
If you named him in your comment and called him an inbred...he could sue you for libel. And you would lose. Just like the Washington Post is going to lose. They don't have a legal leg to stand on.
And the WaPo didn't "comment" on it anyway. They simply reported what witnesses said about the event.
That's what the suit's exhibits all point to --- QUOTES from people who were there describing what they saw.
Last summer Sean Spicer's attorney tried to make grunting noises about the same thing, threatening to "sue" the Associated Press for passing on a story (not even their original story) about a heckler who came into a Spicer book signing and accused him of racism. Which is also a fact, it happened and it's fully on video. Spicer's attack dog started spewing about how he was going to "sue" AP for passing that on. Needles to say, he never did. Because he can't.
These fascist assholes can whine and stomp their feet all they like but you can't just "sue" people for accurately reporting what someone said. Period.