- Moderator
- #61
The dubious definition of self defence in America is more reason why self defence shouldn't be a valid reason to own gunsZimmerman was self defense.Tell me, that woman who got shot by her 2 year old son, she had a permit, yes?It's not people with permits doing the killing. Can't you get that through your thick skull?All I know is 30,000 gun deaths a year versus about 200 of those being justified in any wayDo you know what the requirements are to get a CC permit and the hundreds of rules you have to follow or the circumstances in which you can draw your gun or even shoot it. I didn't think so.
The Police chief who shot the kid in the movies, had a permit, yes?
George Zimmerman, had a permit, yes?
And besides, the other murderers also carried hidden guns too. They simply skipped the process of getting a permit, but did the same things having a permit would have let them do legally: carry guns everywhere
What is dubious about our definition of self defense?