Less infrared heat from six solar farms say otherwise.It's nice to see you admit that the FLoT means solar doesn't cool the planet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Less infrared heat from six solar farms say otherwise.It's nice to see you admit that the FLoT means solar doesn't cool the planet.
Electric heaters for everyone.
So…. an incremental cooling effect from replacing fossil fuels with solar?The significantly LESS waste heat.
I hate electric furnaces and water heaters. They blow.Very popular here in the beautiful Pacific Northwest ...
Less infrared heat from six solar farms say otherwise.
Lower infrared radiation was measured at six solar farms. The waste heat from using its electricity replaced the waste heat from electricity generated from fossil fuels.Now do you have one about net cooling? LOL!
I’m hate electric furnaces and water heaters. They blow.
Lower infrared radiation was measured at six solar farms. The waste heat from using its electricity replaced the waste heat from electricity generated from fossil fuels.
Actually it doesn’t. You don’t know how to do an incremental analysis.Makes just as much sense as your solar claim.
More, because none of my cooling can be credited to atmospheric cooling.
Hate ‘em. Worst idea ever.Dirt cheap though ... it's the market solution to natural gas ...
Correct.But only at the farms themselves ... that's what these heat cameras are picking up ... 20 sq km in a 6,000 sq km county isn't any measurable difference ...
The lower infrared radiation at six solar farms was due to photons being converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.How much of that "heat loss" was because of increased airflow across the panels?
Whereas I believe you never understood my original claim and that’s why you are acting like a troll.I agree, you needed to change your original stupid claim.
Actually it’s not. You never understood any part of my claim.That's ding's modified stupid claim.
Eliminating fossil fuel waste heat could trigger the next glacial cycle.
Less infrared heat from six solar farms say otherwise.
Lower infrared radiation was measured at six solar farms. The waste heat from using its electricity replaced the waste heat from electricity generated from fossil fuels.
Actually it doesn’t. You don’t know how to do an incremental analysis.
The lower infrared radiation at six solar farms was due to photons being converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.
Whereas I believe you never understood my original claim and that’s why you are acting like a troll.
Actually it’s not. You never understood any part of my claim.