Global Warming. Kiss Your Ass Goodbye.

[haveatit]

LOL... "TIME IS SHORT" can I call BULL SHIT? Tell me what happened when the earth had CO2 levels above 7,000ppm and methane levels in the same realm? it did not runaway. why? Water vapor and the sun...

You are going to have to show me those graphs. None of the ones I posted even come close to that number for anything.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Perhaps you might get a better idea of what's actually happening if you didn't try to suss it from cartoons.

If I shove my head up my own ass I might get a better idea of why you types are constantly worried about the weather.
Call me when the coastal cities are under water

 

[haveatit]

Such pretty graphs, but does anyone care? I don't.

Can't say I'm surprised. Which polluter do you work for.

 

[haveatit]

NO GUISE WERE ALL GONNA DIE OBVIOUSLY WORLD SOCIALISM IS THE ONLY THING THAT CAN SAVE US

Really? It hasn't been working so great in China.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Let me guess. You are pinning your whole case on some recent little downward wiggle in the data. Look at the graphs. They all show the same trend. And many come from different sources. You don't think we're doomed? Look again at what I wrote and the graphs I posted. Not that it will do any good against a denier. So, what do I expect from you next? Maybe you already did it and I just haven't seen it yet. What I expect from you is to post some old black and white photographs of some religious nut walking around with a sign that says, "The End Is At Hand." Or some such similar crap. Sure, throughout history people have been saying that the end is near. But they were never right, were they. Though these days, with the scientific data that we have, those who say such things from a scientific point of view are most likely right.

Lets look at the hypothesis. There are over 100 items that affect the much sought after "self-replenishing-cycle" or atmospheric hot spot that has yet to appear. All modeling, currently overestimates warming by, at minimum, a factor of ten. Models using the hypothesis are unmitigated failures. Predictions made are so far out of line with observations that once a year they have to regroup and fix them by adjusting the empirical data. NOAA has been caught 2-5 time a year adjusting the data. The empirical evidence lays waste to the CAGW hypothesis.

YOU all want to cut the throat of the US but not any communist country... why is that?

 

[haveatit]

Then how do we fix it?.... Die?....
The fact is that there are a growing number of scientists that disagree on the cause and have even written about how slow of a process global warming is and the level of severity of its effects on human life....
In other words... It may not be so bad to have a few degrees of warming....

Maybe I'll start a thread about possible "fixes." Next, the only thing growing is the bullshit the polluters are putting out as a response.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Can't say I'm surprised. Which polluter do you work for.

Ironically, one that produces plastics.


It doesn't matter. One fucking degree higher on average ain't gonna do shit.

 

[Billy_Bob]

What I find amazing are the number of people who do not know even the basic hypothesis. I'm betting our new poster boy is one of them... Once you read this, then we can talk about the real threats to our home world.

Here is a link to the basics--> The Skeptic's Case | David M.W. Evans

 

[haveatit]

Lets look at the hypothesis. There are over 100 items that affect the much sought after "self-replenishing-cycle" or atmospheric hot spot that has yet to appear. All modeling, currently overestimates warming by, at minimum, a factor of ten. Models using the hypothesis are unmitigated failures. Predictions made are so far out of line with observations that once a year they have to regroup and fix them by adjusting the empirical data. NOAA has been caught 2-5 time a year adjusting the data. The empirical evidence lays waste to the CAGW hypothesis.

YOU all want to cut the throat of the US but not any communist country... why is that?

Gee, more bullshit. What a surprise. Next, who said anything about not expecting communist countries to clean up their act too.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Climate Change Cult predictions have been wrong over and over again

• All the Times Global Warming Predictions Were Dead Wrong​

  

  All the Times Global Warming Predictions Were Dead Wrong

  We've heard so much nonsense over the past half-century when it comes to global warming predictions. These 10 failed global warming predictions prove that there's hardly a 'consensus' about how the climate is changing

  www.westernjournal.com
  
  Published: Aug 08, 2018
  
  Author: C. Doug…
  
  Estimated Reading Time: 10 mins
  • 1. Global cooling is the real problem. When the environmentalist movement began in earnest …
    2. If global warming isn’t reversed by the year 2000, it will be too late to avert catastrophe. Do …
    3. We’ll be living in Antarctica pretty soon. Ten years ago, a group called Forum for the Future …
    4. Great Britain will be almost snow-less thanks to global warming. Back in 2000, climate …
    See full list on westernjournal.com

• A Brief History of Fantastically Wrong Climate Change Predictions​

  https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/content/2017-04-24...
  Apr 24, 2017 · Apr 24, 2017. The modern environmentalist movement began in earnest in 1970, when activists founded Earth Day as a way to call attention to the ways in which man-made climate change was destroying the planet. Then, as now, those activists claimed a scientific consensus about just how devastating the impact of climate change would be, yet for 45 years …

• 50 years of predictions that the climate apocalypse is nigh​

  https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/50-years-of...
  Nov 13, 2021 · In 1989, a senior UN environmental official shaved a year off that dire prediction, saying that if we didn’t fix climate change by 1999, we would have “Global disaster, nations wiped off …
  • Author: Post Editorial Board

• Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions​

  

  Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute

  Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and...

  cei.org
  • • 1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’
    • 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’
    • 1976: ‘The Cooling’
    • 1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’
    See full list on cei.org

 

[Hellbilly]

When science is actually employed, you get people who know that it is a lie and can articulate why it is a lie..

People like that tend to have a political agenda. The one guy I trust on this issue is Neil deGrasse Tyson. He doesn't debate, he just provides us with information.

 

[excalibur]

NO GUISE WERE ALL GONNA DIE OBVIOUSLY WORLD SOCIALISM IS THE ONLY THING THAT CAN SAVE US

You will own nothing (and be happy).

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I started a thread about a climate hero who actually set himself on fire to bring attention to human caused global warming. But I think we need to get directly to the point. Human caused global warming is a reality. And you are all doomed. For the most part, the media won't tell you about it. Which is run by the wealthy. They dictate your lives in every way. And they have decided not only that you will die, but how you will die. That being with as much ignorance as possible. Not only have they decided that you must die, but no doubt for many they view it as a necessary thing. The only thing any of you will get out of the issue is lip service. Not real action.

Even on a couple different television shows they showed on PBS on the issue, they brought up often enough a feedback loop in global warming. They spoke fairly often how one thing will reinforce another thing. But I don't remember them ever saying what a a feedback loop would actually mean. It means that the warmer things get, the FASTER it will get even warmer. They also seem to like to speak often on TV about what the ocean levels will be in the year 2100. But it is unlikely any of you will see the year 2050.

Your time is short. How short exactly is hard to say. I would give it 20 to 30 years. The reason why is mainly methane. It is around 86 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than CO2. Bill Nye did a show about it called Global meltdown. Regardless of how you may feel about Bill Nye, in part of the show he talked to an actual scientist who had been studying the problem for about 15 years. Though he was a tenured professor at some university, he decided to give up his tenured professorship and start preparing for doomsday. And he said the worst culprit is methane. Like CO2, it is ever increasing. I will show you a graph of it. Astonishingly, despite things like thawing tundra, it is said that human activities are responsible for around 60% of it.

View attachment 651093

Or if you don't like that one, I have another.
View attachment 651094

One of the things that makes this so bad is that not in the history of the Earth have we ever been in this position. It the past of course it has been far warmer. But in more recent history it has been getting cooler. When things are cooler, of course more methane will have a chance to accumulate. Much gets buried underground of course. But not all of it. And when things start getting warmer faster as it is, that methane will have the ability to escape quickly. I will show you a graph of the Earths temperature to show what I am talking about.

View attachment 651095

Now for all those deniers out there, I will unload on you all of the human caused glob all warming graphs that I have. Feel free to deny away.

View attachment 651097
View attachment 651098

View attachment 651099

View attachment 651100

View attachment 651101

View attachment 651102

View attachment 651103

View attachment 651104

View attachment 651105

I guess i better stop eating prunes...That will cut my farting down by 50% and save the world.

 

[daveman]

Call me when the polar bears are all dead
View attachment 651107

If it can't be questioned, it's not science -- it's a cult.

 

[daveman]

Really? It hasn't been working so great in China.

China doesn't buy into your cult's dogma.

 

[daveman]

You will own nothing (and be happy).

EAT THE BUGS PEASANT

 

[MisterBeale]

Stop using your cellphone if you believe in Man Made Global Warming.

How smartphones are heating up the planet​

View attachment 651109

https://theconversation.com/how-smartphones-are...

Mar 25, 2018 · In absolute values, emissions caused by smartphones will jump from 17 to 125 megatons of CO2 equivalent per year (Mt-CO2e/yr) in that time …

• Author: Lotfi Belkhir
• Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins

At this point, it isn't just smartphones, it is all smart tech. From EV cars, to PC and tablets hooked into the internet of things, to smart TEE VEEs, and smart houses, the entire "smartgrid," feeds into the internet of things, which necessitates cloud computing data centers, which crunch metadata, which use huge amounts of energy.

As your article states;

". . .Having conducted a meticulous and fairly exhaustive inventory of the contribution of ICT —including devices like PCs, laptops, monitors, smartphones and tablets — and infrastructure like data centres and communication networks, we found that the relative contribution of ICT to the total global footprint is expected to grow from about one per cent in 2007 to 3.5 per cent by 2020 and reaching 14 per cent by 2040.

That’s more than half the relative contribution of the entire transportation sector worldwide.. . "

But digging in to that research, it doesn't even go into how much "GHG," would be produced if they have to make data centers for the AI computation of autonomous cars. . . it boggles the mind on the amount of sensors, places along roads and on cars that would need to be gathered and processed at these centers, and the amount of energy that would need to be consumed . . . .

 

[johngaltshrugged]

If it can't be questioned, it's not science -- it's a cult.

I have done intense scientific research that proves if everybody doesn't give me all their money today, you will all be dead in 10 years.
I can't show anybody my work but all my sock accounts agree the science is settled.

When can I expect your check?

 

[daveman]

I have done intense scientific research that proves if everybody doesn't give me all their money today, you will all be dead in 10 years.
I can't show anybody my work but all my sock accounts agree the science is settled.

When can I expect your check?

Are you Al Gore, or Greta Thunberg?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]