Global Warming is political "science" and politicians need a question put to them

[skookerasbil]

Global warming 100% political....not debatable.

After 20+ years, wind/solar still a joke. Zero legislation. The people don't care.

 

[Crick]

You just admitted that progs believe truth is nothing more than symptom of the Dunning-Kreuger effect.

Excellent consistency.

 

[LaDairis]

Pick 5 years. Pick 100 years. Pick 1,000 years. Pick 100,000 years. Pick 1 million years.

What it is, over geological time, which is hundreds of millions and billions of years, the earth has experienced quite a bit of climate. It moves about, it's complex, it varies; always has, always will. Man, geologically, has not been around for very long. So if you take the climate when man has been about, the alarmists are shitting themselves, because they are looking at a snap shot of the planet.

Now, alarmists claim the earth is too warm and we'll evaporate if average temps hit 3c higher and 440ppm co2 is catastrophic. Now, can you tell me if that's right? The Cretaceous period was 2,400+ ppm co2, 4c higher, plants and dinosaurs flourished. The Quaternary period hit over 8,000ppm co2, glaciation and life continued.

So I'm all ears. The stuff alarmists claim does not tally with past evidence, yet, we're doomed. Can you explain why their agenda does not match reality?

As to your question; the Sahara used to be a temperate forest, Scott of Antarctica had found fossilized tree samples. Co2 is only a tiny bit of the puzzle, too complex to resolve it with tax and changing my car, but, you know best.

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

If you cannot figure out climate change yet, consider this....


LAND MOVES tectonically

 

[Crick]

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

If you cannot figure out climate change yet, consider this....


LAND MOVES tectonically

The rate at which humans are putting GHGs into the atmosphere and thus the rate at which humans are raising the planet's temperature is the most critical factor of all. It is that rate which precludes biological adaptation. It is that rate that precludes geological factors from buffering some of those changes. It is that rate that makes the cost of holding off catastrophic changes insurmountable.

 

[LaDairis]

rate at which humans are putting GHGs into the atmosphere

SUB HUMANS parrot lies


Are you vaccinated 8 times yet....


There is NO WARMING in the ACTUAL DATA, just in the FUDGE....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Co2 went up. The two and only two measures of atmospheric temps showed NO WARMING....


What would Crick do???

FUDGE BOTH DATA SERIES with uncorrelated "corrections"



Co2 does NOTHING

 

[skookerasbil]

The rate at which humans are putting GHGs into the atmosphere and thus the rate at which humans are raising the planet's temperature is the most critical factor of all. It is that rate which precludes biological adaptation. It is that rate that precludes geological factors from buffering some of those changes. It is that rate that makes the cost of holding off catastrophic changes insurmountable.

Lol....what a bunch of hooey.

Anyway, your point is 100% moot. With China opening 2-3 new coal plants EVERY MONTH now and every month for the next 8 years, any talk about GHG's is silly. Silly.

The AGW obsessed would build a chain link fence around their property to keep the mosquitos out of the yard

 

[bripat9643]

The rate at which humans are putting GHGs into the atmosphere and thus the rate at which humans are raising the planet's temperature is the most critical factor of all. It is that rate which precludes biological adaptation. It is that rate that precludes geological factors from buffering some of those changes. It is that rate that makes the cost of holding off catastrophic changes insurmountable.

AGW is a con.

 

[badger2]

Global warming is climate science. Only idiot Republicans think it's got anything to do with politics.

No, at a certain point in the future, if the Chinese think it's real, it could get very political if/when they decide to move/buy the Russia Far East:

'With its main financial center at Shanghai flooded and its agricultural heartland baking in insufferable heat, China's days as a global power will be numbered.'
(McCoy, To Govern the Globe, p. 312)

 

[surada]

This is just pathetic.

Science went out with journalism here in America, it was "canceled." Global Warming is 100% politics and 0% science. That is why this topic is here.

There is a question the warmers cannot answer, the media will not ask, and the politicians pushing algore's fraud want censored. Fox will not ask it. Ted Cruz will not ask it. Why, because it flat out destroys the argument that Co2 causes climate change... and hence the credibility of the entire "news" media and the liars behind the fraud.

The warmers want you to believe Co2 is the driving variable behind Earth climate change. IT is not. The data never supported that conclusion. What causes Earth climate change is precisely what the past million years of Northern Hemisphere history tells us....


What did North America (NA) look like 1 million years ago?

T
All of Canada down through Indiana was covered in mile plus think ice 1 million years ago, the "North American Ice Age" (notice it is continent specific).

Now, in the first image, Greenland is frozen a million years ago ..... but was it?????????





"Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green

The oldest ever recovered DNA samples have been collected from under more than a mile of Greenland ice, and their analysis suggests the island was much warmer during the last Ice Age than previously thought.


The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles.


IN PLAIN ENGLISH


During the Past 1 million years, Greenland FROZE while North America thawed, all at the same time on the same planet with the same atmosphere with the same amount of Co2 in the atmosphere


WHY?

WHAT CAUSED THAT?


Not one of the people here or in DC pushing algore's fraud can answer that. Clearly, the atmosphere did not cause it. Hence, Co2 had nothing to do with it....


So I ask, everyone here, before we bilk the taxpayer out of trillions more for algore's fraud, why do not we insist these thieving fudge baking liars answer that question before one more dime is spent on their phony theory and their anti-american fascist agenda....

There was an inland sea from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

 

[bripat9643]

There was an inland sea from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

That has absolutely nothing to do with AGW

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

That has absolutely nothing to do with AGW

Yup. The epieric sea that used to cover the interior of the US was later filled in by erosion of the Appalachians as well as uplift.

 

[bripat9643]

Yup. The epieric sea that used to cover the interior of the US was later filled in by erosion of the Appalachians as well as uplift.

What does that have to do with AGW, asshole?

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

What does that have to do with AGW, asshole?

It was in response to another post about the epieric sea in the mid continent of the US.

What is your malfunction?

 

[bripat9643]

It was in response to another post about the epieric sea in the mid continent of the US.

What is your malfunction?

Did I mention anything about that? You're not exchanging posts with some other poster, dumbass.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

Did I mention anything about that? You're not exchanging posts with some other poster, dumbass.

I was agreeing that the mid-continent sea has nothing to do with climate change. It was what was called an epieric sea and was later filled in by uplift and the infilling from the erosion of the Appalachians.

Why are you attacking me? What is wrong with you?

 

[bripat9643]

I was agreeing that the mid-continent sea has nothing to do with climate change. It was what was called an epieric sea and was later filled in by uplift and the infilling from the erosion of the Appalachians.

Why are you attacking me? What is wrong with you?

I didn't say a thing about any epieric sea, so what the fuck are you agreeing with? Go tell your other poster, moron, not me.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

I didn't say a thing about any epieric sea

YOU WERE RESPONDING TO ANOTHER POSTER WHO NOTED THAT AT ONE TIME THERE WAS A SEA IN THE MIDDLE OF WHAT IS NOW THE USA.

You fuckin' idiot, that's what a fuckin' epieric sea is!

, so what the fuck are you agreeing with? Go tell your other poster, moron, not me.

You need help, my friend. You really need help fast.

 

[bripat9643]

YOU WERE RESPONDING TO ANOTHER POSTER WHO NOTED THAT AT ONE TIME THERE WAS A SEA IN THE MIDDLE OF WHAT IS NOW THE USA.

You fuckin' idiot, that's what a fuckin' epieric sea is!



You need help, my friend. You really need help fast.

It doesn't matter what an epieric sea is. It still have nothing to with AGW. That's why I asked you what it had to do with AGW.

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

It doesn't matter what an epieric sea is. It still have nothing to with AGW.

AND I AGREED!!!! WHAT IS YOUR MALFUNCTION?????

That's why I asked you what it had to do with AGW.

Oh jeezus. You need help. Seriously dude.

 

[Crick]

SUB HUMANS parrot lies


Are you vaccinated 8 times yet....


There is NO WARMING in the ACTUAL DATA, just in the FUDGE....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Co2 went up. The two and only two measures of atmospheric temps showed NO WARMING....


What would Crick do???

FUDGE BOTH DATA SERIES with uncorrelated "corrections"



Co2 does NOTHING

If you want to look at this and then tell us there's no warming going on, we can't stop you. But anyone with two neurons to rub together fully understands how overwhelmingly full of shit you are.