Goddamn, another ass proving what a dumb fuck they are. First, renewables are far cheaper to install and maintain than are fossil fuels or nuclear. Second , EV's are going to be less costly to own and fuel. Less costly to purchase by 2025. Far from stopping the economy, the economy will improve. And then there is the little matter of clean air and clean water.
China invests more in renewables than any other nation one this planet. China has planted more trees than the rest of the nations on this planet put together. And you are a liar if you state that the economy does better under Republicans than Democrats;
Go ahead, answer that question for us. However, for the US here are the figures;
Go ahead, answer that question for us. However, for the US here are the figures;
View attachment 561432
Ah well, what else to expect than lies from a "Conservative". All are more costly than solar and wind. And all have externalities that are not included in the price like the cost of asthma and various cancers. Not that you give a damn about your fellow citizens health. Even were it less costly, until a private insurance company will insure a nuke plant, I do not regard them as safe.
You just couldn't help yourself from saying something stupid. I can't fix your kind of stupid, AH.
I don't see a link for your fist two pronouncements...the only investing in renewables China does is to steal our technology with them and take over the manufacturing of them like solar panels...do you know how many solar panel companies in the USA have gone under because China under cuts them via slave labor?...and if China is planting trees its because China needs lumber you fool....not to make the air cleaner....
Carbon is blamed for climate change....Blamed for??? nothing is proven regarding carbon and its relation to climate change....and many scientists are voicing their concern that we are moving too fast with renewables and it may not be necessary....and it sure ain't worth ruining our economy over it....Really trying to prove you are one fucked up ignoramus, eh? Here is what the USGS says about that;
Do the Earth's volcanoes emit more CO2 than human activities? No.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a greenhouse gas and is the primary gas blamed for climate change. While sulfur dioxide released in contemporary volcanic eruptions has occasionally caused detectable global cooling of the lower atmosphere, the carbon dioxide released in contemporary volcanic eruptions has never caused detectable global warming of the atmosphere. In 2010, human activities were responsible for a projected 35 billion metric tons (gigatons) of CO2 emissions. All studies to date of global volcanic carbon dioxide emissions indicate that present-day subaerial and submarine volcanoes release less than a percent of the carbon dioxide released currently by human activities. While it has been proposed that intense volcanic release of carbon dioxide in the deep geologic past did cause global warming, and possibly some mass extinctions, this is a topic of scientific debate at present.
Volcanoes Can Affect Climate
www.usgs.gov
www.newsweek.com
www.newswire.ca
Good lord, we are now at 20% renewables, and that percentage is going up every day. Yes, we full well know what the cost are.
Probably due to the fact that if you have the intellect for a science education in China, you get one, no problems about loans. So today, they are filing more patents than we are. In fact, much of their technology is well ahead of us. And the are planting trees in an effort to hold back the deserts. Really, you should do a bit of reading before revealing your ignorance.
Better tell Obama to move real soon. I hope he gets back at those swindlers who suckered him into buying that seaside mansion.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here is Dr. Spencer's own graph;Carbon is blamed for climate change....Blamed for??? nothing is proven regarding carbon and its relation to climate change....and many scientists are voicing their concern that we are moving too fast with renewables and it may not be necessary....and it sure ain't worth ruining our economy over it....
Yes, the Climate Is Changing. No, It's Not an Emergency
The focus should be on making sure that we are not hamstringing American consumers and American businesses by self-inflicted economic wounds in the name of global warming when China and the rest of the world don't care and don't act.
"Spencer explained that media pundits wildly exaggerate claims of global warming or climate change with every extreme weather event or wildfire, but the data and evidence tell a different story"
No Climate Emergency says NASA Award-Winning Climate Scientist - Climate Activists Undermine Your Freedoms says Investigative Journalist
/CNW/ - NASA award-winning climate scientist, Dr. Roy Spencer, presented "The Main Reasons Why There is No Climate Emergency" for part two of Friends of...
Wait until the government grants dry up and when the taxes kick in. You only know what your masters tell you.
But so what??? the earth heats and it will cool...and if it doesn't we can deal with it if we are smart....forest management sea walls are among many things we can do...but if another deadly virus is released by accident of on purpose it could kill millions...I contest that is our most pressing issue not the climate changing...that's what climate does...it changes...
You really don't have the IQ to be discussing anything Righty.Correct. The public are lead to believe that 440ppm co2 is too great and if the planet heats up by 3c, it's the end of civilization.
Before the political science, science concluded that in the Cretaceous period, it was 2,400pm co2 and so 4c warmer than today, on average. But why didn't life evaporate? In fact, it flourished, so much so, this was the period in the earth's history the dinosaurs apparently flourished. It took a meteorite to wipe them out.
So where does manmade climate change come into this? Did science for donkey years get it wrong, or is the science of today motivated by something else!!
LOLCorrect. The public are lead to believe that 440ppm co2 is too great and if the planet heats up by 3c, it's the end of civilization.
Before the political science, science concluded that in the Cretaceous period, it was 2,400pm co2 and so 4c warmer than today, on average. But why didn't life evaporate? In fact, it flourished, so much so, this was the period in the earth's history the dinosaurs apparently flourished. It took a meteorite to wipe them out.
So where does manmade climate change come into this? Did science for donkey years get it wrong, or is the science of today motivated by something else!!
Correct. The public are lead to believe that 440ppm co2 is too great and if the planet heats up by 3c, it's the end of civilization.
Before the political science, science concluded that in the Cretaceous period, it was 2,400pm co2 and so 4c warmer than today, on average. But why didn't life evaporate? In fact, it flourished, so much so, this was the period in the earth's history the dinosaurs apparently flourished. It took a meteorite to wipe them out.
So where does manmade climate change come into this? Did science for donkey years get it wrong, or is the science of today motivated by something else!!
