psikeyhackr
Silver Member
- Jul 18, 2010
- 1,313
- 181
- 98
Manufacturing and distributing products creates pollution and CO2 even if it is not exactly a pollutant. If planned obsolescence is occurring in consumer products then more pollutants and CO2 are produced than necessary.In a thread in the environmental forum.
Defective algebra?
Now a lot of the push back about climate is about economics. So what if part of our problem is that we are indoctrinated to think about economics WRONG? Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is in Project Gutenberg. You can download it and search it. Search it for "and account". Smith used the word education EIGHTY TIMES and said, "read, write and account" multiple times not "read, write and arithmetic."
But Smith did not live in a world with planned obsolescence and complicated technology where you practically had to be an engineer to evaluate the consumer products. He wrote about making PINS! So if unnecessary depreciation of consumer trash means unnecessary manufacturing then it becomes part of the climate issue.
So economists not talking about planned obsolescence since 1960 and climate scientists not talking about it since 1990 are part of the issue too.