Global Warming (Assuming It's Happening) is a Blessing From God

[Mashmont]

That doesn't help you. In the domain where quantum physics applies, it predicts behavior extremely well. Where Newtonian physics applies, it predicts extremely well. Where classic relativity applies, it predicts extremely well. You can posit a god that can do anything, but the universe gives us NO evidence that any god is doing anything that actually violates physical laws.

Those laws aren't violated within that sphere, as your pal Dagosa agreed with me. But there are ways around the old laws with the set of new laws. Old law: Man can never live long enough to travel to another galaxy using traditional means. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light: New laws: man can travel instantaneously to other galaxies using quantum physics. Old laws not violated; just skirted.

And you think there aren't layers and layers of additional systems we haven't heard of or could imagine of? Thus, the Biblical line: nothing is impossible with God. We don't know what we don't know.

 

[Dagosa]

You say I know little about science then repeat what I just said.

Hardly. A denier of AGW climate change is a science illiterate. You hilariously cling to QM to give yourself cred when it’s used extensively to both variety the existence of cancer cells in the human body and monitor the existence of AGW climate change. Now make light of the word “consensus”, another dullard strategy to illustrate your ignorance of the scientific method. .

 

[Dagosa]

Those laws aren't violated within that sphere, as your pal Dagosa agreed with me. But there are ways around the old laws with the set of new laws. Old law: Man can never live long enough to travel to another galaxy using traditional means. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light: New laws: man can travel instantaneously to other galaxies using quantum physics. Old laws not violated; just skirted.

And you think there aren't layers and layers of additional systems we haven't heard of or could imagine of? Thus, the Biblical line: nothing is impossible with God. We don't know what we don't know.

You are BS ing again. There is no “ way around the old laws” That’s hilarious. All science theories are valid within the confines of existing knowledge. We are still expanding our knowledge of Newtonian physics. It’s not “ old” bubba. It’s as useful as it was decades ago. Don’t forget, while you praise the use of QM it’s right in the middle of fact finding that illustrates AGW climate change. You’re funny. Every time you pretend to know a little science, it’s more illustrative of AGW climate change…and everything else you deny.

 

[Dagosa]

God set the whole system in place in the first place. As for fixed laws, there are systems we don't know much about that upend the laws we thought we knew. An example of that is quantum physics.

Hilarious…..god is just an illusion we apply to anything we don’t understand….

 

[Mashmont]

Hardly. A denier of AGW climate change is a science illiterate. You hilariously cling to QM to give yourself cred when it’s used extensively to both variety the existence of cancer cells in the human body and monitor the existence of AGW climate change. Now make light of the word “consensus”, another dullard strategy to illustrate your ignorance of the scientific method. .

There is no consensus. That's a leftwing talking point.

 

[Mashmont]

Hilarious…..god is just an illusion we apply to anything we don’t understand….

Most scientists believe in God. I thought you were all about consensus.

 

[Mashmont]

That’s hilarious. All science theories are valid within the confines of existing knowledge.

You say exactly what I say. Then you laugh at it. Doesn't make much sense.

 

[Dagosa]

You say exactly what I say. Then you laugh at it. Doesn't make much sense.

I laugh at you because the existing knowledge derived from QM based research ALL supports AGW climate change. You’re funny. You play with fire, you get burned.

 

[Mashmont]

I laugh at you because the existing knowledge derived from QM based research ALL supports AGW climate change. You’re funny. You play with fire, you get burned.

AGW is a politically-motivated hoax. There is no consensus. The debate isn't closed. It is never closed with true science. That's proof that this is a fraud.

 

[Crick]

AGW is a politically-motivated hoax.

It is a very widely accepted scientific theory.

There is no consensus.

There is a very strong consensus.

The debate isn't closed.

There are still a very small number of scientists who reject it, but they are a tiny minority. As with any science, there are still lots and lots of conversations about the details.

It is never closed with true science.

It isn't closed, but it has not been falsified and the major facets of the theory are not seriously challenged by anyone.

That's proof that this is a fraud.

It's evidence that you have very little knowledge of science.

 

[Dagosa]

AGW is a politically-motivated hoax. There is no consensus. The debate isn't closed. It is never closed with true science. That's proof that this is a fraud.

Then all your talk is bullshit. You were just raving about QM and it’s validity. You’re a fraud. QM helps define CO2 as a greenhouse gas where nitrogen is not.
Define CONSENSUS…..go ahead, fraud.
You just made yourself a fraud by denouncing AGW climate change when it’s verified constantly using QM related information.
Let’s see how much more silly you are…..define consensus….

 

[Dagosa]

It is a very widely accepted scientific theory.

There is a very strong consensus.

There are still a very small number of scientists who reject it, but they are a tiny minority. As with any science, there are still lots and lots of conversations about the details.

It isn't closed, but it has not been falsified and the major facets of the theory are not seriously challenged by anyone.

It's evidence that you have very little knowledge of science.

He’s a typical dipshit denier. He pretends to validate himself using woo woo while lying through his teeth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is a very widely accepted scientific theory.

And the solutions, for the most part, are politically motivated giant wastes of time, energy and money.

 

[Mashmont]

It's evidence that you have very little knowledge of science.

I have a STEM degree. What do you have?

 

[Mashmont]

Then all your talk is bullshit. You were just raving about QM and it’s validity. You’re a fraud. QM helps define CO2 as a greenhouse gas where nitrogen is not.
Define CONSENSUS…..go ahead, fraud.
You just made yourself a fraud by denouncing AGW climate change when it’s verified constantly using QM related information.
Let’s see how much more silly you are…..define consensus….

This reminds me of two other implausible hoaxes put forth by the left as indisputable: the allegedly complete vanishing of WMD in Iraq three years after US inspectors verified their existence; and the assertion that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. These three things have in common: we were told that all three were obviously true by the leftwing media and NO ONE is allowed to dispute them, and anyone who does will be subject to ridicule, firing, and isolation. These are the techniques of every far left despotic regime in history.

In all three cases, if it were true, they wouldn't have to force-feed it.

 

[Dagosa]

This reminds me of two other implausible hoaxes put forth by the left as indisputable: the allegedly complete vanishing of WMD in Iraq three years after US inspectors verified their existence; and the assertion that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. These three things have in common: we were told that all three were obviously true by the leftwing media and NO ONE is allowed to dispute them, and anyone who does will be subject to ridicule, firing, and isolation. These are the techniques of every far left despotic regime in history.

Change the subject to babbling ? You’re all over the place. You must be writing a fiction novel.

 

[Mashmont]

Change the subject to babbling ? You’re all over the place. You must be writing a fiction novel.

Not changing the subject, just naming two other things that the left handled the exact same way. "NO DISPUTING" is not part of the scientific method. You should immediately become wary when somebody says that about a theory.

 

[Dagosa]

I have a STEM degree. What do you have?

Stem ? You keep claiming that. I’m an astronaut and a doctor. I do brain surgeries on Tuesdays. I’ll give you a discount,

 

[Mashmont]

Stem ? You keep claiming that. I’m an astronaut and a doctor. I do brain surgeries on Tuesdays. I’ll give you a discount,

OK then. So maybe you'll drop the crap about others who disagree with you not being educated.

 

[Dagosa]

Not changing the subject, just naming two other things that the left handled the exact same way. "NO DISPUTING" is not part of the scientific method. You should immediately become wary when somebody says that about a theory.

You have no idea what a ‘ theory”:is in science do you ?
Stem degree ? Still Trying to Earn Money ?