Global solar increases 64% in first six months of 2025

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
65,372
Reaction score
11,372
Points
2,040
Location
Portland, Ore.
Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India more and more nations are finding solar a better solution for energy needs than fossil fuels. No railroads, pipelines, mines, or drilling needed. No need to purchase fuel for to convert water to steam and run that through very expensive turbines. And you can use the land that the panels are on for other purposes as well, farming or parking lots.

Here is the link that somehow did not get posted on the last attempt;

 
Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India more and more nations are finding solar a better solution for energy needs than fossil fuels. No railroads, pipelines, mines, or drilling needed. No need to purchase fuel for to convert water to steam and run that through very expensive turbines. And you can use the land that the panels are on for other purposes as well, farming or parking lots.

Here is the link that somehow did not get posted on the last attempt;

We're falling behind the rest of the world.
 
Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India more and more nations are finding solar a better solution for energy needs than fossil fuels. No railroads, pipelines, mines, or drilling needed. No need to purchase fuel for to convert water to steam and run that through very expensive turbines. And you can use the land that the panels are on for other purposes as well, farming or parking lots.

Here is the link that somehow did not get posted on the last attempt;

:doubt: https://www.npr.org/2023/03/02/1160...w-coal-plants-than-other-countries-report-fin
 

Global solar increases 64% in first six months of 2025​

For a second I thought you meant the Sun just got hotter.

Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India
64% of nothing is still nothing. Solar is attractive yes because the Sun is a source of essentially unlimited, inexhaustible power, the problem is in getting it, photoelectrically converting it to DC electricity, then changing it to 60Hz AC, is neither an easy nor cheap technology, and if not done right as China and India are most surely likely to do, can lead to massive abuse of the environment much less encourage slave labor in accomplishing.

There are no free rides.
 
Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India more and more nations are finding solar a better solution for energy needs than fossil fuels. No railroads, pipelines, mines, or drilling needed. No need to purchase fuel for to convert water to steam and run that through very expensive turbines. And you can use the land that the panels are on for other purposes as well, farming or parking lots.

Here is the link that somehow did not get posted on the last attempt;

I can’t think of a better way to usher in the next glacial period other than the widespread use of solar power.
 
For a second I thought you meant the Sun just got hotter.


64% of nothing is still nothing. Solar is attractive yes because the Sun is a source of essentially unlimited, inexhaustible power, the problem is in getting it, photoelectrically converting it to DC electricity, then changing it to 60Hz AC, is neither an easy nor cheap technology, and if not done right as China and India are most surely likely to do, can lead to massive abuse of the environment much less encourage slave labor in accomplishing.

There are no free rides.
'clean energy' is an oxymoron.......~S~
 
Solar has failed across the world

Solar is a product of the oil and gas industry. That is why solar is the most expensive least efficient way to make electricity
Miss Elektra, that is one of the dumbest things you have posted yet. So you think that silica comes from oil wells? Or the metals and compounds used in thin film solar comes from oil wells? LOL
 
Miss Elektra, that is one of the dumbest things you have posted yet. So you think that silica comes from oil wells? Or the metals and compounds used in thin film solar comes from oil wells? LOL
Yep, solar panels come from refineries.
Old Crock, you claimed steel where you worked was made without stuff from oil and gas then you linked to a page that said you are wrong.

last I checked, polysilicon is a chemical. Of course I worked for Wacker, and now SpaceX so what do us in the industry know
Screenshot_20250913_141613_Google.webp
 
Solar installation increased by 64% in the first six months of 2025 over 2024. Led by China and India more and more nations are finding solar a better solution for energy needs than fossil fuels. No railroads, pipelines, mines, or drilling needed. No need to purchase fuel for to convert water to steam and run that through very expensive turbines. And you can use the land that the panels are on for other purposes as well, farming or parking lots.

Here is the link that somehow did not get posted on the last attempt;

64%? What a coincidence, so did electric bills.
 
Yep, solar panels come from refineries.
Old Crock, you claimed steel where you worked was made without stuff from oil and gas then you linked to a page that said you are wrong.

last I checked, polysilicon is a chemical. Of course I worked for Wacker, and now SpaceX so what do us in the industry know
View attachment 1161727
Miss Elektra, such a silly person you are. While our reheat oven used natural gas, when we smelted the steel in 100 ton lots, it was all done with electricity. And the Pueblo mill now uses solar for most of their electrical needs.

 
For a second I thought you meant the Sun just got hotter.


64% of nothing is still nothing. Solar is attractive yes because the Sun is a source of essentially unlimited, inexhaustible power, the problem is in getting it, photoelectrically converting it to DC electricity, then changing it to 60Hz AC, is neither an easy nor cheap technology, and if not done right as China and India are most surely likely to do, can lead to massive abuse of the environment much less encourage slave labor in accomplishing.

There are no free rides.
 
For a second I thought you meant the Sun just got hotter.


64% of nothing is still nothing. Solar is attractive yes because the Sun is a source of essentially unlimited, inexhaustible power, the problem is in getting it, photoelectrically converting it to DC electricity, then changing it to 60Hz AC, is neither an easy nor cheap technology, and if not done right as China and India are most surely likely to do, can lead to massive abuse of the environment much less encourage slave labor in accomplishing.

There are no free rides.
So 2000 terra watts is nothing? Must you always post such lies? Right now solar is the least expensive way to generate electricity. And it is far less environmentally destructive than mining and burning coal. Slave labor? Damn, but you are telling the most ridiculous lies.
 
15th post
So 2000 terra watts is nothing?
When did I say otherwise?

Must you always post such lies?
What lies? Be specific.

Right now solar is the least expensive way to generate electricity.
Hmm. I can build a nuclear power plant on a few acres of land capable of powering half a state for 50 years; how much of a state can I power on just a few acres of solar panels around the clock? Remember, the shit doesn't even work at all on cloudy, rainy, stormy days or from late afternoon to mid-morning, so it won't even serve as a primary power source.

And it is far less environmentally destructive than mining and burning coal.
What is damaging about tunneling some coal deep out of the ground? Will the gophers miss it?
 
All those people who live on The Sun need to stop driving gas guzzlers and buy Teslas.
 
LOL And 300 million people died of drug overdoses in the US. You lie as easily as the ass you kiss.
Renewable energy production up.

Electric bills up exponentially.

Doesn't take an Einstein to work that one out. You pay renewable energy investors when they produce electric, and when they don't. Are you gonna erect a turbine farm for the electric board to say, "We'll just pay you for electric when demand is there"?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom