Global Ice loss accelerating.

[abu afak]

SunsetTommy also cherry Picked/MISLEAD with an item from the NSIDC. (Natl Snow and Ice Data Center)\
I link here.
Actually he's just cherry picking with help from from Denier BLOG WUWT/WattsUpWithThat.

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

nsidc.org

""November 2021 compared to previous years

The downward linear trend in November sea ice extent over the 43-year satellite record is 53,300 square kilometers (20,600 square miles) per year, or 5 percent per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average.
Also based on the linear trend, since 1979, November has lost 2.2 million square kilometers (849,000 square miles). This is equivalent to about three times the size of Texas.""

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag


`

 

[ding]

And yet here we are today with the planet 2C cooler than in the past and sea levels 26 ft lower than in the past with 120 ppm more CO2.

 

[abu afak]

And yet here we are today with the planet 2C cooler than in the past and sea levels 26 ft lower than in the past with 120 ppm more CO2.

OFF TOPIC and already refuted. (after 100 previous attempts)
You are a one line troll posting nothing but nonsense 10 second harassment, so you just reflexively put up your old daily-used non sequiturs (forgetting I just refuted yesterday).

 

[ding]

OFF TOPIC and already refuted

Not off topic as you are implying that it is man's CO2 emissions which are responsible for the loss of sea ice.

I have:

1. Disputed this by arguing that it is perfectly normal for ice to melt in an interglacial cycle.
2. That our interglacial cycle has not yet ended because we are still 2C below the peak temperatures of previous interglacials.
3. That CO2 does not correlate to temperature since we are 2C cooler with 26 ft lower sea levels with 120 ppm more CO2 than in the past.

So entirely on topic and relevant. And no, none of these statements have been refuted.

 

[ding]

People tend to forget that the ice age began with much warmer temperatures than today and with similar atmospheric CO2 as today.

 

[Old Rocks]

There's absolutely no fucking way the Egyptians built the Pyramids with their primitive tools.

You are so full of shit, Frankie boi. Here are some facts;

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You are so full of shit, Frankie boi. Here are some facts;

Stick with stuff you know.

The civilizations(s) throughout the world predated the Flood not "Stone Age"

Your guy is a putz

 

[Old Rocks]

Stick with stuff you know.

The civilizations(s) throughout the world predated the Flood not "Stone Age"

The 'Flood'? What flood? No evidence at all for a worldwide flood. And no evidence ever for a high tech civilization before our present one.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You are so full of shit, Frankie boi. Here are some facts;

Did you even bother to watch the video you posted?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The 'Flood'? What flood? No evidence at all for a worldwide flood. And no evidence ever for a high tech civilization before our present one.

Well, there you go. There's your problem

 

[Old Rocks]

Did you even bother to watch the video you posted?

Absolutely!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You are so full of shit, Frankie boi. Here are some facts;

How do you tell the difference in age?

Derrrr, duhh, um.

Baalbek, Lebanon

^ Peru

Just 2 instances.

How is it that the civilizations that came later and were supposedly more 'technologically advanced" were not able to match the skill demonstrated by their predecessors?

The foundation stones at Baalbek were limestone and are thousands of years older than the Roman Construction ordered by Augustus after his conquest of Egypt. They show evidence of being underwater for a long period of time

Puma Pukku, Bolivia

This is very interesting. Recent electron microscopic analysis of the volcanic stone show evidence of organic molecules intermixed with the stones. Someone, sometime in the distant past melted down and reformed these stones into their current shape

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I had to stop watching.

Because we never found the pre-Flood machine tools that made this:

therefore it MUST have been made with copper chisels and pounding stones.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hey Old Rocks how did the pre-Inca civilization fits these stones together so perfectly? Copper chisels? Beaver pelts?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hey Old Rocks how did the pre-Inca civilization fits these stones together so perfectly? Copper chisels? Beaver pelts?

Beaver chisels?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The 'Flood'? What flood? No evidence at all for a worldwide flood. And no evidence ever for a high tech civilization before our present one.

^ Cuba

^ Japan

So there was no world wide flood, but 2 pre-Flood civilizations on opposite sides of the planet decided to build pyramids underwater

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Beaver chisels?

Must be. Since we're the most technically advanced civilization in forevah!! and we have no idea how to replicate these construction that can only mean that they do not exist

 

[abu afak]

^ Cuba

^ Japan

So there was no world wide flood, but 2 pre-Flood civilizations on opposite sides of the planet decided to build pyramids underwater

Oh Look anti-science Biblical Creationist/Noah's Flood Frank is further destroying his credentials.

`

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Oh Look anti-science Biblical Creationist/Noah's Flood Frank is further destroying his credentials.

`

That's an awesome explanation!

You should join up with the tard in OR 3 1/2 hour non-explanation YouTube video!

 

[sealybobo]

Awww you forget that those Glaciers including Glacier Bay started retreating long before 1850 came around because the LIA phase started dissipating in the 1700's, which is why many glaciers that grew for centuries during the LIA stopped and began their retreat as the world warmed up.

And you are ignoring the scientists who say the rate of melt has excellerated because of man made global warming. Why do you do that?