Given time, $200 million in the bank, and Biden's tremendous destruction of the USA, the Patriot party will prevail.

[Rambunctious]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No we didn't...we were not granted one evidentiary trial....meaning not one judge wanted to view or hear any evidence....and that's why there was a riot at the capitol and its why this will never go away...Biden is not the legitimate leader of the free world...and even some other nations leaders are saying that now too....

You cant have an evidentiary trial if you have no evidence. Sorry but you cant have a case where you go find evidence after the fact. Stop being a dumbass and educate yourself.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

First of all you offer NO PROOF! JUST your f...king comment, subjective opinion!

NOW I provide the facts ...YOU??? ZERO! Where is YOUR proof?

But millions of Americans refuse to buy this historic lie.
A business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) said that anyone who proposes there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Law Professor Davide K. Clements released a rebuttal video recently refuting the BIG LIE, that there was no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election.
These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized.

“In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.

Update on the BIG LIE: Law Professor Confirms Election Fraud Evidence Is “Significant” – Cases Only Dismissed on Process Grounds Not Merit

The liberal elites and fake news media are working feverishly to cover-up the BIG LIE. Diana West wrote yesterday on how the jackal media and hyena politicians are tearing to pieces all opponents o…

clarion.causeaction.com

Read it and weep Qannon believer.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

There is that leftwingnut word again...qanon...what is that?....

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No we didn't...we were not granted one evidentiary trial....meaning not one judge wanted to view or hear any evidence....and that's why there was a riot at the capitol and its why this will never go away...Biden is not the legitimate leader of the free world...and even some other nations leaders are saying that now too....

You cant have an evidentiary trial if you have no evidence. Sorry but you cant have a case where you go find evidence after the fact. Stop being a dumbass and educate yourself.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

You can't deny hearing evidence and keep people satisfied...the courts were afraid to listen to evidence because they know the election was stolen...the fact that no state that flipped in the middle of the night allowed a real audit of each and every vote tells it all.....they didn't want to get it right....

There was zero evidence which is why the case was tossed. The courts job isnt to keep crazy people satisfied. The courts job is render decisions based on evidence which of course the Dump people had none.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No we didn't...we were not granted one evidentiary trial....meaning not one judge wanted to view or hear any evidence....and that's why there was a riot at the capitol and its why this will never go away...Biden is not the legitimate leader of the free world...and even some other nations leaders are saying that now too....

You cant have an evidentiary trial if you have no evidence. Sorry but you cant have a case where you go find evidence after the fact. Stop being a dumbass and educate yourself.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

First of all you offer NO PROOF! JUST your f...king comment, subjective opinion!

NOW I provide the facts ...YOU??? ZERO! Where is YOUR proof?

But millions of Americans refuse to buy this historic lie.
A business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) said that anyone who proposes there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Law Professor Davide K. Clements released a rebuttal video recently refuting the BIG LIE, that there was no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election.
These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized.

“In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.

Update on the BIG LIE: Law Professor Confirms Election Fraud Evidence Is “Significant” – Cases Only Dismissed on Process Grounds Not Merit

The liberal elites and fake news media are working feverishly to cover-up the BIG LIE. Diana West wrote yesterday on how the jackal media and hyena politicians are tearing to pieces all opponents o…

clarion.causeaction.com

Read it and weep Qannon believer.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

There is that leftwingnut word again...qanon...what is that?....

Dont deny your lord and savior Qannon. You do realize he can see and hear everything you do right?

 

[Care4all]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

 

[Mac1958]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... be seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will deter.one the winner, o one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

...with his media pounding it home 24/7/365...

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

 

[Asclepias]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

Who told you one party had to stand outside? Claims aren't proof. Documentation is proof.

 

[Care4all]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... be seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will deter.one the winner, o one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

...with his media pounding it home 24/7/365...

Yep, don't forget the MEDIA from his minions, here...and across the Bering Sea!

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

Who told you one party had to stand outside? Claims aren't proof. Documentation is proof.

Because I saw them. With my own eyes. On T.V
And I read in the newspapers the Judgement of the Philladeplhia court ordering Dems to let them in.
And the next day, I read in the newspapers the Appeal made by Dems in Court who wanted to keep them out.
And after 3 days of counting, they finally gained entry but were told to keep 50 feet away.
This is all documented in court records and newspaper archives.
As I said, that alone makes the election void to most sane people.

 

[Care4all]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

 

[rightwinger]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

In many swing states, Republicans blocked an early counting of mail in ballots.

Then they act surprised that mail in went against them

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

In many swing states, Republicans blocked an early counting of mail in ballots.

Then they act surprised that mail in went against them

Like in Phillie?
1.8 million postal votes sent out.
1.4 million sent back.
2.2 million counted.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?

 

[Asclepias]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

Who told you one party had to stand outside? Claims aren't proof. Documentation is proof.

Because I saw them. With my own eyes. On T.V
And I read in the newspapers the Judgement of the Philladeplhia court ordering Dems to let them in.
And the next day, I read in the newspapers the Appeal made by Dems in Court who wanted to keep them out.
And after 3 days of counting, they finally gained entry but were told to keep 50 feet away.
This is all documented in court records and newspaper archives.
As I said, that alone makes the election void to most sane people.

On TV isnt with your own eyes dufus. Besides watching OAN isnt exactly reliable.

 

[rightwinger]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

In many swing states, Republicans blocked an early counting of mail in ballots.

Then they act surprised that mail in went against them

Like in Phillie?
1.8 million postal votes sent out.
1.4 million sent back.
2.2 million counted.

More made up nonsense

Not playing your silly game